Search results

Nice. Actually, it might not be so coincidental the object was observed right at the end of the eclipse, because only then the Sun's rays would illuminate objects close to/at the sun (observed, not actual).

Not sure if it is "brighter" than the glare, but it does not look saturated to me (but the glare is). I agree about the open question, but I don't know.

There is a thing called Earth's albedo. It is the fraction of sunlight that is diffusely reflected by a body (Earth). This is on average 30%, plenty to illuminate satellites from below during eclipse.

I think it is the shadow formed by a screen, hoisted up. As they similarly did with another screen in the beginning of the video, in post #1. Basically the screen is blocking the furthest beams, and the middle blue one is in front (it is a circular laser set up). This image is might be a long...

By the way, was there not a documentary or film, or something, in the making? Or did I miss something? Sorry for my ignorance.

Wasn't it so with lighthouses that the beam is blocked when shining on land?

I hope an expert can come here and explain it, but I can imagine a burst of audio (bang!) is more dangerous, as to compared to say an audio source producing say 105dB SPL. Rather tricky, for instance the airpods could have a "fluke" producing a sudden loud peak sound as to a "bang"? Somehow not...

I am innocent! I guess you meant @Trailblazer..

Tricky to follow this thread with all these deleted twitter things. Oh well, never mind, carry on.

He does not want to find truth or anything. For reasons I am not going to write up, but obviously he does not want this train to stop.

The system is analogous to the effect (electro)magnetism. Here the object gets equally charged and thus repels from the generator, and after some distance the force will be reduced to 0. So, not much use rather than to demonstrate "floating" objects. You can achieve the same with magnets...

From @flarkey 's post, quote from the pilot: Why do pilots seem to have the habit to make things up? I don't get it.

There is. The aperture/iris has to be small (F/large) to be able to create a large Depth of Focus.

Textbook debunk, great stuff.

Eh, what? I am not sure what Corbell is going on about.. ...

"Weaponized" was uploaded on the 13th of March, is that footage not recent? Confusing..

For some reason they all think the lights must go in a circular-racetrack motion. Strange to think that way, but they (pilots) all seem to do so.

Optical blur can be caused by a number of things, like slight defocus, dirty lenses, etc. But, when designed right, an IR objective, which is in many cases based on mirrors, can make images just as sharp as in VIS. The different tech image sensor for (far) IR is causing the problem of "blur".

Agreeing with @JimJam, looks very much like spotlights pointed up, sweeping the sky/clouds.

Although 100% camera reflection effects, the only remaining "issue" is that the first picture from OP is not showing similar camera effects. I am pretty sure it must be because of the angle(s) but cannot completely explain it (or images being cropped?)