<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Metabunk.org - Blogs - Mick</title>
		<link>http://metabunk.org/blogs/1-Mick</link>
		<description>All about bunk, and how to debunk it</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:32:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Skeptical Software Tools</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/entries/7-Skeptical-Software-Tools</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Tim Farley's site Skeptical Software Tools (http://skeptools.wordpress.com/) has some interesting posts, particularly this one about Building...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="blogcontent restore">Tim Farley's site <a href="http://skeptools.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Skeptical Software Tools</a> has some interesting posts, particularly this one about Building Internet Tools For Skeptics. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://skeptools.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/building-internet-tools-for-skeptics/" target="_blank">http://skeptools.wordpress.com/2008/...-for-skeptics/</a><br />
<br />
It does not seem like there's been much activity there.  Being a programmer I find it pretty interesting, and I'd like to experiment with some tools myself. <br />
<br />
I think one of the more useful tools would be some way of getting a quick perspective on the scale of a topic, its relative size and links to other topics. This is quite hard to do at the moment.</blockquote>

]]></content:encoded>
			<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/entries/7-Skeptical-Software-Tools</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lists of Skeptical Topics</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/entries/6-Lists-of-Skeptical-Topics</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 08:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'd just posted a link to the periodic table of irrational topics, and I realized that I was familiar with about 90% of the topics there.  It got me...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="blogcontent restore">I'd just posted a link to the periodic table of irrational topics, and I realized that I was familiar with about 90% of the topics there.  It got me wondering what other lists there are of skeptical topics.<br />
<br />
Periodic table of irrational topics (118 Topics)<br />
<a href="http://www.crispian.net/PTIR/Nonsense.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.crispian.net/PTIR/Nonsense.html</a><br />
<br />
Investigator Topics List from Investigator Magazine (189 topics)<br />
<a href="http://ed5015.tripod.com/SkepticsTopicsList69.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://ed5015.tripod.com/SkepticsTopicsList69.htm</a><br />
<br />
Skpetic Dictionary (645) <br />
<a href="http://www.skepdic.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.skepdic.com/</a><br />
This is more of a glossary than a list of topics.<br />
<br />
Wikipedia Rational Skepticticism Watchlist<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiproject_Rational_Skepticism/Skeptic_watchlists#Lists_of_skeptical_subjects" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...tical_subjects</a><br />
<br />
Debunkatron (Maybe 100 or so topics, hierarchical , with multiple links)<br />
<a href="http://debunkatron.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://debunkatron.com/</a><br />
Also has a large list of links, well worth trawling through.<br />
<br />
I'm thinking these could be combined programmatically into some kind of metabunktionary.</blockquote>

]]></content:encoded>
			<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/entries/6-Lists-of-Skeptical-Topics</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Periodic Table of Irrational Nonsense</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/entries/5-Periodic-Table-of-Irrational-Nonsense</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 23:47:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A good overview of some of the bunk out there: 
 
http://www.crispian.net/PTIR/Nonsense.html 
 
Attachment 44...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="blogcontent restore">A good overview of some of the bunk out there:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.crispian.net/PTIR/Nonsense.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.crispian.net/PTIR/Nonsense.html</a><br />
<br />
<img src="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=44&amp;d=1318727048" border="0" alt="Name:  www.crispian.net_PTIR_Nonsense.html-20101231-154340.jpg
Views: 2798
Size:  91.9 KB" class="thumbnail" style="float:CONFIG" /><br />
<br />
Unfortunately I can't really condone it, as it use extremely pejorative terms to describe the various groups.  While you might be <i>technically</i> right to describe Christians as delusional, it's hardly going to help the discussion, is it?<br />
<br />
This poking fun at people (and just plain insulting them) is entertaining for the skeptics, but it's not actually helping the cause of promoting science and reason.</blockquote>

]]></content:encoded>
			<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/entries/5-Periodic-Table-of-Irrational-Nonsense</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New Year, New Site</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/entries/4-New-Year-New-Site</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:17:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[So for 2011 I'm going to try a new place to put my musings and investigations.  The old sites worked pretty well, and I've got over 20,000 comments...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="blogcontent restore">So for 2011 I'm going to try a new place to put my musings and investigations.  The old sites worked pretty well, and I've got over 20,000 comments on them over the years. I thought it was time to add a more general place, where I could talk about the real meat-topic, debunking.<br />
<br />
So here's metabunk.org, still nascent and rather empty. We'll see what 2011 shall bring to fill it up.</blockquote>

]]></content:encoded>
			<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/entries/4-New-Year-New-Site</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
