<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Metabunk.org</title>
		<link>http://metabunk.org/</link>
		<description>All about bunk, and how to debunk it</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:34:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Sandy, Evan, Oswald... Weather Warfare?</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1609-Sandy-Evan-Oswald-Weather-Warfare?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:01:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have been doing quite a lot of research into weather and environmental modification and I would like to invite people to read the articles...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have been doing quite a lot of research into weather and environmental modification and I would like to invite people to read the articles provided. I believe that Sandy, Evan and Oswald may have been manufactured.<br />
<br />
Article #1: The unusual nature of Hurricane Sandy<br />
<a href="http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/2012/11/hurricanesandy/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.inf...urricanesandy/</a><br />
<br />
Governments are using and testing weather modification technology without our knowledge. This is due to the fact that ENMOD banned the use and not the research or possession of environmental modification techniques. The problem we have is that it is easy to cheat this prohibition. Weather modification has no source. You know someone is responsible when something gets bombed, but how do we know someone is responsible if a city gets flooded?<br />
<br />
Article #2: Why am I so concerned?<br />
<a href="http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/2012/12/why-am-i-so-concerned/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.inf...-so-concerned/</a><br />
<br />
NASA states that:<br />
<br />
“Even small changes in the abundance or location of clouds could change the climate more than the anticipated changes caused by greenhouse gases, human-produced aerosols, or other factors associated with global change.“<br />
<br />
Weather modification has a great deal more of an effect on climate then carbon. Why isn't this effect discussed publicly? Why isn't the effect of weather modification on climate part of the climate change debate?<br />
<br />
Article #3: Cyclone Evan and the Carbon Conspiracy<br />
<a href="http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/2012/12/cyclone-evan-has-a-weird-and-peculiar-track/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.inf...eculiar-track/</a><br />
<br />
Article #4: Cyclone Oswald and ENMOD<br />
<a href="http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/2013/02/cyclone-oswald-and-enmod/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.inf...ald-and-enmod/</a><br />
<br />
It is important that we expose the effect of weather and environmental modification on our planet. In time we could expose the unusual nature of storms and then possibility that storms may be manufactured. I am sure we could do this slowly, without pointing fingers, without starting war, but I think we need to do it now. The longer it takes, the worse it gets.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/8-Conspiracy-Theories">Conspiracy Theories</category>
			<dc:creator>subhumn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1609-Sandy-Evan-Oswald-Weather-Warfare</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Potential saveable guy</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1608-Potential-saveable-guy?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 05:48:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey Jay and Mick.  I'm having a talk with a person called EmGBlackout under the following video...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hey Jay and Mick.  I'm having a talk with a person called EmGBlackout under the following video <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCohucT7FmQ&amp;lc=2iFxYiWncVcughH0cN8ry0czDshZbhfOccQh2iwzs-E&amp;feature=em-comment_reply_received&amp;lch=email_reply" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCohu...ch=email_reply</a>  He seems prepared to think after having been super aggressive (I was a paid disinformation agent, apparently)  Would be cool if you guys with more knowledge than I have could get over there.   PS I go by &quot;lizoir&quot; on YouTube.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/2-General-Discussion">General Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Neil Pennington</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1608-Potential-saveable-guy</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hello, a discussion about memes and their influence on bunk.</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1607-Hello-a-discussion-about-memes-and-their-influence-on-bunk?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 05:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hello all,  
Just wanted to make a thread to introduce myself. My names Rich and I am a skeptic. Besides researching already debunked or current...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello all, <br />
Just wanted to make a thread to introduce myself. My names Rich and I am a skeptic. Besides researching already debunked or current theories, I have never tried to debunk anything other than trying to convince my hippie friends the science behind things. I figured I would try my first discussion here but not directly try and debunk something but point out how sometimes people try and create conspiracies using the wrong things as examples. I got into reading about bunk and conspiracies lately mostly due to friends on social media bombarding me with memes. Don't get me wrong I love a good meme, if it makes sense. I don't like memes that use imagery and words designed to elicit fear and/or anger as the first emotion. I say if someones intention is to get people mad or scared, at least have your facts right or use examples that make sense. <br />
<br />
I couldn't for the life of me find a copy of the meme I will discuss, I will try and give the gist of it best I can. If anyone has the meme please post it. The meme talks about how there is a U.S. government (left wing?) conspiracy to suppress green or renewable energy and to prove this point they site Iceland as an example because Iceland produces 100% of its electricity with renewable energy. I don't know if  the PTB are conspiring to hold anything back or not, I have not researched it all that much. My gripe is that Iceland's energy model is based on hydro and geothermal power, about 75% and 25% (depending on source) respectively. Geothermal also heats a large portion (87%) of homes and business. Right off the bat I say to myself the U.S. probably could produce that much hydro power but would we want to? I say no since that would require building more dams. Currently the U.S. produces about 66.8% of the renewable power through hydro and renewable only accounts for about 13% of energy in the U.S.<br />
<br />
Just to put things into perspective, Iceland only has a population of about 325,000 and its hydro and geothermal plants produce a max of 1,155mw and 200mw respectively. The U.S. Produces more megawatts of renewable energy than Iceland by a long shot, just not 100% of its total output. Also a large portion of the power produce is used for aluminum mining and that process is not very green. For the simple reason that the amount of energy being produced is so small compared to the U.S. I believe using Iceland as an example for the conspiracy is a faulty one.<br />
<br />
I hope this subject is not off topic at all. I invite anyone to give their thoughts, not only on what you think of this particular meme but if there are memes you have seen that you think are giving bunk or are misleading. Or just the overall influence memes are having in getting people to believe in bunk. I will also invite anyone's thoughts on if you think or don't think it is a conspiracy that renewable energy is being held back.<br />
<br />
I hope the days of 100% green and renewable energy for the world are close.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.icetradedirectory.com/english/industry_sectors_in_iceland/energy_in_iceland/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.icetradedirectory.com/eng...gy_in_iceland/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/2-General-Discussion">General Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Soulfly</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1607-Hello-a-discussion-about-memes-and-their-influence-on-bunk</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Articles, Wiki, Politeness, Psychology</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1605-Articles-Wiki-Politeness-Psychology?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 23:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I ran across this article and I found it useful. A systematic debunking of global warming deniers.  http://grist.org/series/skeptics/ 
 
I would like...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I ran across this article and I found it useful. A systematic debunking of global warming deniers.  <a href="http://grist.org/series/skeptics/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://grist.org/series/skeptics/</a><br />
<br />
I would like to see master-debunking articles like that here on metabunk. I wonder if adding a wiki is the right format for it. Though, the format at grist is pretty workable: it lets people comment on each sub-point that is delineated in response to the theory. <br />
<br />
I'd also like to work up an article/wiki/forum about the psychology behind bunk-believers. I hope I'm not drifting outside the lines of the politeness policy. But like many, I have years of pent up anger at the assault on reason, and insulting behavior, coming from the bunkers. My point though is, can we summarize where they are coming from, and how to quickly and effectively stiff-arm or sidestep them in general. And this of course involves some psychology. And of course its fair game to analyze ourselves psychologically, or see what the bunkers say about our psychology, though of course its tricky to do this and stay polite. I mean I think this is why the debates get so heated, because its almost deeper than discussing religion or politics, its discussing people's bedrock beliefs.<br />
<br />
I say this partly because, in my experience, when I say to them &quot;can we just agree to disagree&quot; they say NO WE CAN'T, and then they call me names. And thus in my experience, IT NEVER ENDS. I predict we will see this played out in this forum. Hear me now, believe me later. Thus, my interest in discovering the psychological underpinnings of the bunkers and conspiracy guys, and exploiting it. Either politely, or also by specifying how to best push their buttons or throw it back in their faces, e.g. by embroidering new theories or conflating their theories, in small or large scale <i>reductio ad absurdum</i>. Again I'm sorry if this is over the line but I really think it should be put on the table and faced squarely.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/2-General-Discussion">General Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1605-Articles-Wiki-Politeness-Psychology</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Look Up" - chemtrails documentary on Kickstarter]]></title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1604-quot-Look-Up-quot-chemtrails-documentary-on-Kickstarter?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:42:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I just noticed this Kickstarter project organized by George Barnes, asking for $200,000 to create a documentary on chemtrails: 
 ...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I just noticed this Kickstarter project organized by George Barnes, asking for $200,000 to create a documentary on chemtrails:<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/869502189/look-up-eco-threat-to-mankind-linked-to-artificial" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/...-to-artificial</a><br />
<br />
As of this writing, 11 people have donated almost $3k to the project since it started on May 6th(that's a better yield from so few people than many Kickstarter projects). Most of the evidence shown on the page is the same stuff that has been debunked here and elsewhere. Thought you guys might like to take a look, though unfortunately there is no way to comment without backing it. <br />
<br />
I found the &quot;risks and challenges&quot; section is good for a laugh:<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_quote"   style="background-color: #ebf6e7;">
		<div class="quote_container">
			<div class="bbcode_quote_container"></div>
<span class="postcontent lastedited">
<img src="images/misc/quote_icon.png" alt="Quote" /> Content from external source:</span><br><br>
<br />
Challenges- difficulty getting the scientists to come forward with truth., but as a director, my forte is organic storytelling, and getting the honesty out of people when they are in front of the camera.<br />

</div>
	</div>
</div><br />
<br />
Translation: using film cuts and cherry picking to derive the &quot;truth&quot; from people who are honestly contradicting your message.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/9-Contrails-and-Chemtrails">Contrails and Chemtrails</category>
			<dc:creator>jvnk08</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1604-quot-Look-Up-quot-chemtrails-documentary-on-Kickstarter</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Red sky at night, sailors delight.</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1603-Red-sky-at-night-sailors-delight?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:40:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I have often run across believers that insist that colorful sunsets are evidence of chemicals in the fake spray clouds.  But the old rhyme "red sky...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have often run across believers that insist that colorful sunsets are evidence of chemicals in the fake spray clouds.  But the old rhyme &quot;red sky at night, sailors delight&quot; predates aviation by quite a bit.  It is actually a useful rhyme for pre-modern-weather-forecasting days because a red sky in the evening usually occurs on the east coast of the US when there is a departing storm system and the sun shines up under high cirrus clouds.  (the rhyme does not work for tropical systems approaching the east coast from the south or east).  <br />
<br />
Anyway, I had a great example of that from an unseasonably strong cool front that passed through Florida Sunday night into Monday.  <br />
<br />
The first picture is from Monday evening (13 May 2013) which was a blustery overcast day until the late afternoon when the low clouds cleared out leaving a bit of a cirrus deck.<br />
<br />
The second picture is about 6 pm the following day (14 May 2013).  Tuesday was an absolutely spectacular day with blinding sun and not a cloud of any type to be seen<br />
<a href="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2806&amp;d=1368639570" id="attachment2806" rel="Lightbox_0" ><img src="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2806&amp;d=1368639570&amp;thumb=1" border="0" alt="Click image for larger version.&nbsp;

Name:	CIMG0169.jpg&nbsp;
Views:	7&nbsp;
Size:	316.1 KB&nbsp;
ID:	2806" class="thumbnail" style="float:CONFIG" /></a><a href="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2807&amp;d=1368639575" id="attachment2807" rel="Lightbox_0" ><img src="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2807&amp;d=1368639575&amp;thumb=1" border="0" alt="Click image for larger version.&nbsp;

Name:	CIMG0171.jpg&nbsp;
Views:	8&nbsp;
Size:	219.7 KB&nbsp;
ID:	2807" class="thumbnail" style="float:CONFIG" /></a>.</div>


	<div style="padding:10px">

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Thumbnails</legend>
			<div style="padding:10px">
			
<a href="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2806&amp;d=1368639570" 
rel="Lightbox_43991" id="attachment2806"
><img class="thumbnail" src="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2806&amp;stc=1&amp;thumb=1&amp;d=1368639570" 
alt="Click image for larger version.&nbsp;

Name:	CIMG0169.jpg&nbsp;
Views:	N/A&nbsp;
Size:	316.1 KB&nbsp;
ID:	2806"/></a>
&nbsp;

<a href="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2807&amp;d=1368639575" 
rel="Lightbox_43991" id="attachment2807"
><img class="thumbnail" src="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2807&amp;stc=1&amp;thumb=1&amp;d=1368639575" 
alt="Click image for larger version.&nbsp;

Name:	CIMG0171.jpg&nbsp;
Views:	N/A&nbsp;
Size:	219.7 KB&nbsp;
ID:	2807"/></a>
&nbsp;

			</div>
		</fieldset>
	

	

	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/9-Contrails-and-Chemtrails">Contrails and Chemtrails</category>
			<dc:creator>scombrid</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1603-Red-sky-at-night-sailors-delight</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[They're Spraying Us Like Bugs]]></title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1602-They-re-Spraying-Us-Like-Bugs?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's a mind puzzler for the Chemtrail set. If this all powerful enemy is spraying us (although we don't know what... or why...) how come they can't...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Here's a mind puzzler for the Chemtrail set. If this all powerful enemy is spraying us (although we don't know what... or why...) how come they can't figure out a way to do it invisibly?<br />
<br />
These people really annoy me. I think what we need to do is tell them &quot;yes... and now they've developed an INVISIBLE CHEMTRAIL... that only PROVES the conspiracy... you see... people we don't know... thousands of them... are spraying something we can't identify... for no clear reason... and NOW ITS INVISIBLE!&quot;</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/9-Contrails-and-Chemtrails">Contrails and Chemtrails</category>
			<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1602-They-re-Spraying-Us-Like-Bugs</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Three "Chemtrail Scientists" murdered]]></title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1600-Three-quot-Chemtrail-Scientists-quot-murdered?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 05:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[This story, "Three Chemtrail Scientists murdered after Linking Chemtrails to mass death of fish, plant and animal life," is apparently based on three...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This story, &quot;Three Chemtrail Scientists murdered after Linking Chemtrails to mass death of fish, plant and animal life,&quot; is apparently based on three you tube videos of a Dane Wiggington interview on George Noury's radio show.  <br />
<a href="http://beforeitsnews.com/chemtrails/2013/04/environmental-scientists-eugene-franklin-mallove-juventina-villa-mojica-and-dorothy-stang-murdered-after-linking-chemtrails-to-mass-death-of-fish-plant-and-animal-life-three-parts-2430738.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://beforeitsnews.com/chemtrails/...s-2430738.html</a><br />
<br />
I haven't felt like listening to 45 minutes of Dane Wigington but according to sources Wikipedia, Grist and Huffpost, there is no indication that any of them talked about or did research on chemtrails.  Dorothy Stang was an American born catholic activist in Brazil crusading for native rights who was murdered Feb. 12, 2004.  Juventina Villa Mojica was a Mexican activist crusading against drug lords who was murdered Nov 29, 2012.  Eugene Mallove was an American science writer advocating cold fusion and zero point energy who was murdered in an apparent landlord-tenant dispute May 14, 2004.   There is no indication that any of them knew each other.  <br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/01/juventina-villa-mojica-activist-shot-killed-mexico_n_2223861.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_2223861.html</a><br />
<a href="http://grist.org/news/mexican-environmentalist-murdered-by-drug-gangs/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://grist.org/news/mexican-enviro...by-drug-gangs/</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Stang#Murder" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Stang#Murder</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Mallove" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Mallove</a><br />
<br />
All of the other web sources go back to the three You Tube videos by Wigington and Noury.  If I find the exact spot where Wigington claims they were killed after speaking out about chemtrails I will post it.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/9-Contrails-and-Chemtrails">Contrails and Chemtrails</category>
			<dc:creator>Steve Funk</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1600-Three-quot-Chemtrail-Scientists-quot-murdered</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Global Research</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1599-Global-Research?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 07:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The site Global Research showed up in a post to me from a friend.  It seems to be another conspiracy site.   
 
Do y'all have any more on it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The site Global Research showed up in a post to me from a friend.  It seems to be another conspiracy site.  <br />
<br />
Do y'all have any more on it?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/18-People-Debunked">People Debunked</category>
			<dc:creator>Cairenn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1599-Global-Research</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pres Kennedy on conspiracies</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1598-Pres-Kennedy-on-conspiracies?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 06:19:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[An excerpt of this speech was in Sunday's Dallas Morning News.  I went looking for the entire speech here it is. 
 
He could be talking about folks...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>An excerpt of this speech was in Sunday's Dallas Morning News.  I went looking for the entire speech here it is.<br />
<br />
He could be talking about folks today, easily<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_quote"   style="background-color: #ebf6e7;">
		<div class="quote_container">
			<div class="bbcode_quote_container"></div>
<span class="postcontent lastedited">
<img src="images/misc/quote_icon.png" alt="Quote" /> Content from external source:</span><br><br>
Conspiracy Theories Speech<br />
November 18, 1961<br />
<br />
In recent months I have spoken many times about how difficult and dangerous a period it is through which we now move. I would like to take this opportunity to say a word about the American spirit in this time of trial.<br />
<br />
In the most critical periods of our nation's history, there have always been those fringes of our society who have sought to escape their own responsibility by finding a simple solution, an appealing slogan, or a convenient scapegoat.<br />
<br />
Financial crises could be explained by the presence of too many immigrants or too few greenbacks.<br />
<br />
War could be attributed to munitions makers or international bankers.<br />
<br />
Peace conferences failed because we were duped by the British or tricked by the French or deceived by the Russians.<br />
<br />
It was not the presence of Soviet troops in Eastern Europe that drove it to communism, it was the sell-out at Yalta. It was not a civil war that removed China from the free world, it was treason in high places. At times these fanatics have achieved a temporary success among those who lack the will or the vision to face unpleasant tasks or unsolved problems.<br />
<br />
But in time the basic good sense and stability of the great American consensus has always prevailed.<br />
<br />
Now we are face to face once again with a period of heightened peril. The risks are great, the burdens heavy, the problems incapable of swift or lasting solution. And under the strains and frustrations imposed by constant tension and harassment, the discordant voices of extremism are heard once again in the land. Men who are unwilling to face up to the danger from without are convinced that the real danger comes from within. They look suspiciously at their neighbors and their leaders. They call for a 'man on horseback' because they do not trust the people. They find treason in our finest churches, in our highest court, and even in the treatment of our water. They equate the Democratic Party with the welfare state, the welfare state with socialism, and socialism with communism. They object quite rightly to politics' intruding on the military -- but they are anxious for the military to engage in politics.<br />
<br />
But you and I and most Americans take a different view of our peril. We know that it comes from without, not within. It must be met by quiet preparedness, not provocative speeches.<br />
<br />
And the steps taken this year to bolster our defenses -- to increase our missile forces, to put more planes on alert, to provide more airlift and sealift and ready divisions -- to make more certain than ever before that this nation has all the power it will need to deter any attack of any kind -- those steps constitute the most effective answer that can be made to those who would sow the seeds of doubt and hate.<br />
<br />
So let us not heed these counsels of fear and suspicion. Let us concentrate more on keeping enemy bombers and missiles away from our shores, and concentrate less on keeping neighbors away from our shelters. Let us devote more energy to organize the free and friendly nations of the world, with common trade and strategic goals, and devote less energy to organizing armed bands of civilian guerrillas that are more likely to supply local vigilantes than national vigilance.<br />
<br />
Let our patriotism be reflected in the creation of confidence rather than crusades of suspicion. Let us prove we think our country great by striving to make it greater. And, above all, let us remember that, however serious the outlook, the one great irreversible trend in world history is on the side of liberty -- and so, for all time to come, are we.
</div>
	</div>
</div><br />
<br />
<br />
It is this paragraph that is so reminiscent of today.<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_quote"   style="background-color: #ebf6e7;">
		<div class="quote_container">
			<div class="bbcode_quote_container"></div>
<span class="postcontent lastedited">
<img src="images/misc/quote_icon.png" alt="Quote" /> Content from external source:</span><br><br>
Now we are face to face once again with a period of heightened peril. The risks are great, the burdens heavy, the problems incapable of swift or lasting solution. And under the strains and frustrations imposed by constant tension and harassment, the discordant voices of extremism are heard once again in the land. Men who are unwilling to face up to the danger from without are convinced that the real danger comes from within. They look suspiciously at their neighbors and their leaders. They call for a 'man on horseback' because they do not trust the people. They find treason in our finest churches, in our highest court, and even in the treatment of our water. They equate the Democratic Party with the welfare state, the welfare state with socialism, and socialism with communism. They object quite rightly to politics' intruding on the military -- but they are anxious for the military to engage in politics.
</div>
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/8-Conspiracy-Theories">Conspiracy Theories</category>
			<dc:creator>Cairenn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1598-Pres-Kennedy-on-conspiracies</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vigilant citizen- Hide and Seek movie</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1597-Vigilant-citizen-Hide-and-Seek-movie?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 03:30:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/hide-and-seek-the-most-blatant-movie-about-monarch-mind-control-ever/ 
 
What do you guys think?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/hide-and-seek-the-most-blatant-movie-about-monarch-mind-control-ever/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesand...-control-ever/</a><br />
<br />
What do you guys think?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/8-Conspiracy-Theories">Conspiracy Theories</category>
			<dc:creator>newportrojan</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1597-Vigilant-citizen-Hide-and-Seek-movie</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>wow and hello!</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1595-wow-and-hello!?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[After what feels like years of being out in the cold, sporadically arguing with the 'believers' on Youtube, thank god there is a place here to try...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>After what feels like years of being out in the cold, sporadically arguing with the 'believers' on Youtube, thank god there is a place here to try and convince the world that Chemtrails are nonsense!<br />
<br />
I'm Pete, from the UK and I'm looking forward to 'discussing' things with some chemtrail folk (to be kind).</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/2-General-Discussion">General Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1595-wow-and-hello!</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Easyjet to create ash cloud over Europe</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1594-Easyjet-to-create-ash-cloud-over-Europe?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:44:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>this is likely to get some attention  (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-22452559)when it gets seen by chemmies: 
 
A tonne of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-22452559" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">this is likely to get some attention </a>when it gets seen by chemmies:<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_quote"   style="background-color: #ebf6e7;">
		<div class="quote_container">
			<div class="bbcode_quote_container"></div>
<span class="postcontent lastedited">
<img src="images/misc/quote_icon.png" alt="Quote" /> Content from external source:</span><br><br>
A tonne of volcanic ash has been flown from Iceland to Luton airport in readiness for a &quot;unique experiment&quot; to test an aircraft warning system designed to detect ash clouds.<br />
<br />
Ash from the Eyjafjallajokull volcano, which caused travel chaos in 2010, will be dispersed into the atmosphere in &quot;controlled conditions&quot;.<br />

</div>
	</div>
</div><br />
<br />
Another aircraft equiped with experimental ash detection gear will attempt to see and avoid the cloud.<br />
<br />
I'm not sure how the ash will be dispersed, nor how large a volume a tonne will &quot;fill&quot; - ther doesnt' seem to be much on hte web about the more technical aspects of this.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/9-Contrails-and-Chemtrails">Contrails and Chemtrails</category>
			<dc:creator>MikeC</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1594-Easyjet-to-create-ash-cloud-over-Europe</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ISS comander Hadfield made a music-video in Space :-D</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1592-ISS-comander-Hadfield-made-a-music-video-in-Space-D?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 23:41:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Nothing to debunk here, but simply great. 
 
At the end of his longtime-mission on the ISS, Mr. Chris Hadfield covers "Space Oddity" from David Bowie...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Nothing to debunk here, but simply great.<br />
<br />
At the end of his longtime-mission on the ISS, Mr. Chris Hadfield covers &quot;Space Oddity&quot; from David Bowie and some guys on earth edited it to this awesome music-video:<br />
<br />

<iframe class="restrain" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/KaOC9danxNo?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
On his mission he allwys had a good sense of humor :)<br />
<br />
<img src="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2737&amp;d=1368402045" border="0" alt="Name:  Hadfield-Shatner-tweet.jpg
Views: 43
Size:  54.7 KB" class="thumbnail" style="float:CONFIG" /></div>


	<div style="padding:10px">

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
				<div style="padding:10px">
				<img class="attach" src="http://metabunk.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=2737&amp;stc=1&amp;d=1368402045" alt="" />&nbsp;
			</div>
		</fieldset>
	

	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/20-Off-Topic-and-Rambles">Off Topic and Rambles</category>
			<dc:creator>FreiZeitGeist</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1592-ISS-comander-Hadfield-made-a-music-video-in-Space-D</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cambridge resident not happy with Infowars</title>
			<link>http://metabunk.org/threads/1591-Cambridge-resident-not-happy-with-Infowars?goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2xhg_vPP6s</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<iframe class="restrain" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-2xhg_vPP6s?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://metabunk.org/forums/27-Boston-Marathon-Bombings">Boston Marathon Bombings</category>
			<dc:creator>Jay Reynolds</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://metabunk.org/threads/1591-Cambridge-resident-not-happy-with-Infowars</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
