Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: The Claims of Francis Mangels- a Factual Examination

  1. #41
    Member Steve Funk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
    from the 6/25/12 "What we know," document:

    • Shastice park (in Mt.ShastaCity) stream water has 1540 ug/l of aluminum. Other streams have more, certainly bad for aquatic insects if permanent.


    The problem is, there are no streams in Shastice Park. It is near my house and I go there often. Shastice Park has athletic fields, community garden and skating areas, but no stream. There is another park in town which does have a stream, and there is a quasi-park at Sisson Meadows owned by the Siskiyou Land Conservancy that has a couple of streams. Perhaps the sample came from one of these other locations, but who knows. This is an example of Francis' carelessness with details.

  2. #42
    Administrator Mick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    8,026
    Thanks
    185
    Thanked 1,559 Times in 1,036 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Perhaps when it rains, you get some minor muddy "streams" running down a path or something like that. Note the 2/28/11 version says:

    Quote Content from external source:


    • Shastice park (in Mt. Shasta City) stream water has 1540 ug/l of aluminum. This is probably debilitating to trout, certainly bad for aquatic insects if permanent.



    Certainly no trout in Shastice Park. Maybe he realized that.

    The key thing with all of his groundwater tests is that he's not accounting for soil at all. He seemingly does not understand that the aluminum in muddy water is coming from the mud.

  3. #43
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,414
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 728 Times in 434 Posts
    I just eaxmined Mangels claim that he has lab reports showing large differences in aluminum content between soil in his backyard and soil (presumably not exposed to purported 'spraying) under his house. This was brought out first by Steve, and my calculations confirmed his. However, to examine the plausibility of Mangels claim, I found that to apply that same amount of aluminum oxide across just Siskiyou county would require 1/2 of the world's total aluminum oxide production!!

    http://metabunk.org/threads/341-Debu...ll=1#post10853
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  4. #44
    Member Steve Funk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick View Post
    Perhaps when it rains, you get some minor muddy "streams" running down a path or something like that.
    There is nothing remotely resembling a stream in Shastice Park. It is all grass and parking lot. He must be thinking of some other location.

  5. #45
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,414
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 728 Times in 434 Posts
    Hey, the Chemtrails Project is asking for suggestions on interview questions for an interview with Francis Mangels.

    Facebook Feedback Needed: Francis Mangels (retired USDA biologist) Interview Questions.....

    Hey Guys! This weekend I will be shooting an interview with Francis, which we will be playing at the Consciousness Beyond Chemtrails Conference. It will be a fully edited piece, a "mini-doc".

    For one segment, I would like to ask him questions from Facebook. So if you have any questions for him, please let me know here. Anything regarding heavy metals in the rainwater, soil, effects on gardening - anything you can think of in that subject matter.

    Thanks!!
    https://www.facebook.com/chemtrailsproject
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  6. #46
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,414
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 728 Times in 434 Posts
    The Claim:
    Quote Originally Posted by Francis Mangels
    This is what happened to the California tomato crop, same thing. pH went so high you could still get tomatoes, but you couldn't get a crop that was financially big enough to harvest."
    Reality:
    Quote Originally Posted by USDA
    United States Department of Agriculture
    National Agricultural Statistics Service
    2012 California
    Processing Tomato Report
    Cooperating with the California Department of Food and Agriculture
    California Field Office · P.O. Box 1258 · Sacramento, CA 95812 · (916) 498-5161 · (916) 498-5186 Fax · www.nass.usda.gov/ca
    Released: August 31, 2012
    2012 PROCESSING TOMATO PRODUCTION
    Contracted production for California processing tomatoes is forecast at 12.9 million tons, averaging 50.0 tons per acre. The current forecast is 8.03
    percent above the 2011 crop. Winter months were very dry causing water concerns to California processing tomato growers. Spring proved to be
    wet as rains improved the water situation shortterm.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	caltom.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	58.7 KB 
ID:	876
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  7. #47
    Member lotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    319
    Thanks
    417
    Thanked 202 Times in 114 Posts
    So did anything come of this? Is he still making claims? i guess that radio challenge never took off. the obvious errors in methodology here are... obvious. Anything come from the falsification of credentials?

    i dont want to muddy the public appeal of this thread, but has no one noticed that no one in siskiyou is having any problems at all growing their marijuana plants outdoors? a plant that is very ph and nutrient lock sensitive..... just sayin...
    Last edited by lotek; April 13th, 2013 at 06:15 PM.
    Y U NO Lrn2Science?!?

  8. #48
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,414
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 728 Times in 434 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by lotek View Post
    So did anything come of this? Is he still making claims? i guess that radio challenge never took off. the obvious errors in methodology here are... obvious. Anything come from the falsification of credentials?

    i dont want to muddy the public appeal of this thread, but has no one noticed that no one in siskiyou is having any problems at all growing their marijuana plants outdoors? a plant that is very ph and nutrient lock sensitive..... just sayin...
    I've seen that there is a current show on TV called "Weed Country" which glorifies large crops seeming to have no problems growing in that area.
    http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/we...t-the-show.htm

    Mangels was asked by the radio show's host if he would debate me. Mangels claimed that he was in the process of "moving out of state". That turned out to not be true. I did confront Mangels recently on a Global Skywatch conference call. I was disconnected.
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Reynolds For This Useful Post:

    lotek (April 13th, 2013)

  10. #49
    Member lotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    319
    Thanks
    417
    Thanked 202 Times in 114 Posts
    lol classy.

    yea im aware they have zero problem growing weed there, both in their yards and in the very forests he talks about having sampled... and the plants are damn picky and wont flower proper/yield the desired quality if the ph is high. given the cash behind this and the desire of many people to keep organic in their production, one could gather some data on soil and growing conditions from them on non-commercial grower forums such as www.marijuanapassion.org. they are surprisingly open. ive never heard any problems with al/br/sr/high ph from them.

    not that im ontop of that stuff or anything. like i said tho, theres lots of cash behind it so youd bet they would be all over if if their crops couldnt live. id even expect a higher likelyhood of them to buy into the hoax too lol.
    Y U NO Lrn2Science?!?

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to lotek For This Useful Post:

    Biggerdave (April 13th, 2013)

  12. #50
    Member Biggerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    314
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by lotek View Post
    lol classy.

    yea im aware they have zero problem growing weed there, both in their yards and in the very forests he talks about having sampled... and the plants are damn picky and wont flower proper/yield the desired quality if the ph is high. given the cash behind this and the desire of many people to keep organic in their production, one could gather some data on soil and growing conditions from them on non-commercial grower forums such as www.marijuanapassion.org. they are surprisingly open. ive never heard any problems with al/br/sr/high ph from them.

    not that im ontop of that stuff or anything. like i said tho, theres lots of cash behind it so youd bet they would be all over if if their crops couldnt live. id even expect a higher likelyhood of them to buy into the hoax too lol.
    Thanks mate, that post has made me laugh out loud. I will have to remember it in my next FB debate "Hey mate how is your skunk crop?" type of thing. Although, according to police records, most UK production is indoors.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Biggerdave For This Useful Post:

    lotek (April 13th, 2013)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Gravatar as Default Avatar by 1e2.it