Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Alex Jones new rant on GMOs

  1. #1
    Steve
    Guest Steve's Avatar

    Alex Jones new rant on GMOs

    http://www.infowars.com/alien-geneti...d-of-humanity/
    This is the latest from the world greatest fear-monger, Alex Jones. Many of his misunderstands about GMO crops can be debunked just by reading this peer to peer report on Jeffrey Smiths claims.
    http://academicsreview.org/2010/03/n...isinformation/
    I would love to hear your input on this horrible fear- mongering scam to deride the development of several very important industries that are developing and marketing amazing beneficial products.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,406
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 716 Times in 427 Posts
    I really enjoyed the academicsreview.org site. My son's English teacher told me that his class would be doing some writing about the subject of GMOs.
    The way he spoke of it I could tell he was an opponent. I asked my son if he would be willing to risk challenging the teacher, and he said he might, so this looks to be a good resource.
    Chassy and Tribe are to be commended for their concise, very concise debunking.
    Thanks.

    As far as Alex Jones goes, I guess we have yet another front in which to do battle. I recall Alex Jones' YK2 night broadcast, which was so over the top with hype he had people running for the hills til dawn broke and they realized the world was going to continue indefinitely. There's been a lot of water under the bridge since then, but Alex hasn't really shown himself able to discern truth any better. He does addict people to fear, gets them literally high and wanting the fix on a consistent basis. Both he and his advertisers know this quite well of course and make money giving the folks what they crave.
    Last edited by Jay Reynolds; October 28th, 2011 at 05:46 PM.
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  3. #3
    Member Stupid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    455
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 34 Times in 31 Posts
    I do have a fear that GM modified produce might not have all the studies necessary to determine it's impact on insects (good or bad), and the insects' ability to adapt so quickly to these changes, and might struggle. I am not a field biologist. None-the-less, it is not too far a stretch to assume that because insect adaptation takes many years to acclimate to plant adaptation, that sudden biological changes to a reliant crop might present a problem, immediate (or long-term) to the other insect species that rely on such crops........or the birds and such that rely on those very insects that now may have to adapt quickly.

    Corn and soybean are perhaps the largest crops targeted for genetic modification in the US, and rice becoming the (globally) eastern genetically targeted counterpart.
    To wade through the scientific lit. regarding these new GM crops, is like searching for the truth among a "who's who" of gov't and business interests.......with opponents to such changes receiving much less research funding.
    I don't know the answer/conclusion.......but anyone can see there might be bias, depending who is doing the relevant testing.
    Last edited by Stupid; October 31st, 2011 at 08:22 AM.
    "You've been Blaylocked !!"

  4. #4
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,406
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 716 Times in 427 Posts
    The real test is time. The question as to safety is open, and at any point the best way to evaluate is to examine current or past records of ill effects. Can anyone point out any?
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  5. #5
    Steve
    Guest Steve's Avatar
    The use of GM crops can positively impact agricultural
    species biodiversity if the GM crops enable the management
    of weeds and insect pests in a more specific way
    than chemical herbicides and pesticides. In particular, the
    adoption of insect-resistant Bt crops, expressing highly
    specific Bt proteins, represents an opportunity to replace
    broad-spectrum insecticide use. The insecticidal proteins
    expressed in Bt crops such as Bt maize and Bt cotton are so
    narrow in their activity that they have little or no activity
    against non-target organisms. Furthermore, the toxins
    are expressed within the plant tissues, minimizing the
    exposure of animals that do not feed on the crop plants.
    As a consequence, considering the large number of field
    studies that have been conducted, few or no differences
    have been seen with respect to community structure or
    individual species abundances where fields of Bt crops
    have been compared with conventional crops that have
    not been treated with insecticides. Where they have been
    calculated, indices of species diversity and community
    structure have not differed significantly for Bt corn
    fields compared with untreated conventional corn fields
    (e.g. [22–24]) or for Bt cotton fields compared with
    conventional cotton fields [25–28]. The only species that
    have been observed to be significantly and consistently
    less abundant in fields of Bt crops compared with conventional
    fields are the target pests and their specific
    parasites.
    http://www.cof.orst.edu/cof/teach/ag...otech-2005.pdf

  6. #6
    Member Stupid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    455
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 34 Times in 31 Posts
    I have a fear, but that does not make that fear a reality.
    The most talked about documented fear is what happens when the "Roundup Resistent" (RR) crops are sprayed with the Roundup herbicide .....and kill native grasses and plants, but not the target crop.
    In all fairness, crop expansion and habit loss not related to GM RR spraying also figures into the results....

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/12/sc...pagewanted=all
    http://www.monarchwatch.org/waystations/

    Name:  Trend graph1.jpg
Views: 371
Size:  34.8 KB
    Monarch count
    source: http://monarchnet.uga.edu/Partners/WMTC/index.htm

    Here's an overview, but from 2002.
    http://www.foodsafety.k-state.edu/ar...viro_part1.pdf
    .....which may well be an argument against my fears....lol.
    In light of the speed of genetic advancement, patience and field-testing may become shorter and shorter, and genetic proposals become faster and faster.
    Last edited by Stupid; October 31st, 2011 at 09:44 AM.
    "You've been Blaylocked !!"

  7. #7
    Member Ross Marsden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    205
    Thanks
    209
    Thanked 77 Times in 40 Posts
    I thought the main fear about RR crops is that feral crop plants become unkillable weeds, possibly in a field of another RR crop.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,406
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 716 Times in 427 Posts
    The 2002 decline in monarchs was documented to be in Mexico during overwintering. 75% died that winter down there.
    http://www.fs.fed.us/wildflowers/pol...n_Point_MI.pdf
    Not sure about the other years, but USFWS says overwintering habitat in MX has declined.

    Monarch butterflies lay eggs on milkweed species of plants, other butterflies and moths lay on specific species of plants, ie. corn earworms target corn and similar plants.
    If bt corn were so bad that it killed non-targeted species, yet the corn species is the one which is sprayed, why isn't the corn earworm population decimated making sale of bt corn unneccessary? My experience showed that even with the bt corn, some damage occurred, some earworms survived, and there is a risk that those which survived will be resistant individuals. That is why the grower contract I signed when I bought the bt corn seed specified that the corn be mowed down immediately after harvest to reduce the survival of those possibly resistant earworms.

    Rather than pick a non-target species known for its beauty such as the monarch, to determine if bt corn is wiping out lepidopterans in general, one should probably look at the populations of corn earworms over time.

    Some further research found this fellow who has been doing some informal videos specifically looking for monarchs in the gmo intensive areas of the midwest.
    Here he has documented and presents them to some folks who love monarchs and feel he is trying to push an agenda:
    http://www.monarchwatch.org/forums/v...hp?f=15&t=2774

    Turns out that Paul Cherubini does sell pesticides, but also has a degree in entomology:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/leps-l/message/8983

    He has been giving people fits for years, it seems.
    He has a youtube channel:
    http://www.youtube.com/user/4af
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  9. #9
    Member Stupid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    455
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 34 Times in 31 Posts
    Thanks for the research, Jay.
    I'll look at it when I get home.

    I remain open on the subject, and to all points of view, and experience. I am here to learn, as well as help "weed out" any bunk.... (pun).
    Cherubini does seem to be well interested in monarch and habitat.....apparently doing more field investigation than many of those who claim he is wrong.

    Off topic side note....
    I can't get any of my rares species passionflowers to grow to any large size.....the Fliterary butterfly keeps laying it's eggs on them, and I don't have the heart to kill the resulting young caterpillars that feed on the passionflower's leaves.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/flutterbye856/6193163286/
    Last edited by Stupid; November 2nd, 2011 at 05:25 PM.
    "You've been Blaylocked !!"

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest Unregistered's Avatar

    Cool

    Hey kids! Don't Forget!

    There also is a economic aspect to all of this.


    Google: Triffid Flax seed.


    http://anh-europe.org/news/illegal-g...-spencer-bread

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manito...-manitoba.html


    WOW!! BT corn; superbugs, superweeds, superpesticides, supermen??

    Look's like you guy's might get a chance bite into some NON BROWNING APPLES sometime soon.
    HHHMMMM Yummy!!!!

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle2441805/

    it's only one gene, right! : )

  11. #11
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,406
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 716 Times in 427 Posts


    Great editing. Gets to the point.
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jay Reynolds For This Useful Post:

    HappyMonday (November 4th, 2012),Mick (November 4th, 2012),SeanDWalker (March 7th, 2013)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Gravatar as Default Avatar by 1e2.it