Now, I am talking about this site http://www.jamescarner.com/chemtrails.html You know, the one where you said we did not want this tech exposed. "Funny, for Debunk This to claim we do not want that tech exposed, when we have all talked about those photos multiple times, and they are on the Contrail Science website. "Really? are you mentioning this? http://contrailscience.com/short-sun...ook-like-ufos/ It doesn't say anything about any "orbs" READ THE POST
We are all asking you for specifics, but you seem to be avoiding this.
Do you have any specifics, other than "what you think you see" ??
...or what others think they see ?
"You've been Blaylocked !!"
Why is it annoying, when you get questioned on the very links that you post? You can not seriously not expect that can you? What is the point of posting a link if you do not want to discuss it?
But at least we are getting somewhere. By "Bullshit", what do you mean? That that are not what the chemtrail site claims that they are?
I don't want to get swayed from the topic, and this is.
From:...http://www.jamescarner.com/chemtrails.html
That's a lot of suspicion. Do you believe all that ?Someone or someones are very involved in unconstitutional, domestic spying and the entrained plasma orbs carried on electromagnetic beams can be used for mind control programming. The satellites can be programmed to track and monitor various frequencies on different parts of your body. These electromagnetic beams carrying the gas plasma orbs stick due magnetic polarity and frequency mapping and tracking to people's eyes, ears, temples, and private parts. Someone or someones are very involved in unconstitutional, domestic spying and the entrained plasma orbs carried on electromagnetic beams can be used for mind control programming. The satellites can be programmed to track and monitor various frequencies on different parts of your body. These electromagnetic beams carrying the gas plasma orbs stick due magnetic polarity and frequency mapping and tracking to people's eyes, ears, temples, and private parts.
Don't you want more evidence than a website ?
...or further...
Is this your belief ?The satellites download holographic mind control movies, pictures, sounds, and sensations to people through this technology.
Here is his "proof"...
http://www.jamescarner.com/proof.html
....back to the topic...
Last edited by Stupid; January 5th, 2012 at 09:02 AM.
"You've been Blaylocked !!"
I think debunk this is just trolling now, he/she has dodged every question and just posts more irrelevant links. I'm still waiting for answers to my questions!
Still awaiting answers to some simple questions I asked in http://metabunk.org/threads/354-Chem...ull=1#post3666 and the next post after it......
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." -Pascal
"It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley; but not at all so to believe or not in God" - Diderot
I think he's been pretty much trolling all along.
Originally Posted by Debunk This
This link of yours: http://www.jamescarner.com/chemtrails.html
Was pure garbage.
It was full of delusion filled pseudo-scientific claptrap that only the most gullible simpleton would ever accept as evidence.
I was embarrassed for you, that you could stoop so low as to post this as a credible link - which is the real point right DT? You are here to play games.
Your youtube orb fantasies have been a joke from post one.
You don`t believe in them any more than you trust the bunk filled excretion on your jamescarner link do you?
That was your last chance as far as I am concerned.
If you post tripe links to james carner then you are a troll plain and simple. (simple in a bad way)
Last edited by Spongebob; January 5th, 2012 at 12:41 PM.
I'm still waiting for you to verify you have these packets."the Winfield Sky Blue 25 pack is a fake"
No, it is not. I have both of these packets sitting in my room.. NOT FAKE
Display this message on your monitor and take a picture of the packets in front of the monitor displaying this message.
I think the Winfield packs may well be real. It just looked rather fake with one of they being boat wakes.
The whole brainwashing thing rather falls down when you consider that the trails have been in the sky (year round in some locations) for many years already.
Why would you need to condition someone to see something as normal, when they already DO see it as normal, and have done for decades.
Yeah, its funny how these people make claims that any usage of contrails or airplanes in ads or on merchandise, is just brainwashing to get people to think contrails and airplanes are normal.
But everyone else, except the small number of members of the "Insane Clowd Posse", aka Chemmies, thinks they are normal anyways. These chemtrail believers think that because airplanes, contrails and cirrus are sinister to them, that it must actually be sinister to everyone else anyways, and that propaganda is needed to normalize them to it.
Last edited by firepilot; January 5th, 2012 at 08:18 PM.
I should have just posted this link instead. http://www.rense.com/general79/chem.htm
Oh well... i have proven my point with this thread. bye now
Last edited by Mick; January 5th, 2012 at 08:50 PM. Reason: Politeness
Stop with the endless link posting.
You do not prove any point, by endlessly throwing up link after link. How about...I know this is a novel idea to some of you, but actually putting ideas in your own words and stating a fact, a point that you are trying to make.
If you post a link full of bad info, you do not change that by putting up yet another link. You have avoided over and over, trying to discuss what is actually in the links you post. Why is it all of you chemmies do that? Is like you all go to chemmie school, to where you are trained to never state a real point, to detour away from discussing what you post at all times.
Its not that I am full of myself, its that when I post a link or my thoughts, I am fully prepared to talk about any of that. And if I cant, thats my fault, and I cant change that by posting yet another URL link. You will never see me posting pics or links of pics, without knowing exactly what I am posting. You however, were caught not knowing the slightest thing, and kept trying to change it back to your Orb discussion, in which you never actually stated what Orbs were
Impossible - you never made a point!!
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." -Pascal
"It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley; but not at all so to believe or not in God" - Diderot
That you scumbag SHILLS will stop at NOTHING to discredit this information.Impossible - you never made a point!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxnaC_f5yIw
It's not information though is it? It's just videos of some things in the sky that might be birds, or maybe something else.
In fact the last video you post has what is actually described as a bird, and yet it looks nothing like one, and you can't tell how far from the camera it is. So why is this a bird, but every other orb you've posted is not?
I'd urge you to keep watching the skies. But get a good pair of binoculars. Video footage is not very useful because the low resolution makes EVERYTHING look like orbs. Especially bright white things. Regardless of their actual shape.
"Information" ???
Zero "information" . Just 100% trolling mixed with ignorance and absurd beliefs...
Auf Wiedersehen. Adiós. Au revoir. Arrivederci !
Last edited by Mick; January 6th, 2012 at 07:20 AM. Reason: font
"Debunk This" has been banned for link spamming, trolling, and failing to make a point. He was allowed six pages (containing 218 posts) to demonstrate why the orbs were not simply out-of-focus or low resolution objects. He gave no reasons other than "LOL". After several pages of this, it became apparent he was trolling (posting simply to get a response, not stimulate honest discussion). Hence he is banned. Any future posts he makes as "unregistered" will be automatically deleted.
http://tracers.8m.com/tracers.html
[Admin: allowed the above link from DT, as it's an interesting overview. Actual post edited for politeness]
Yes, mr chemtrailorbs aka debunkthis challenged me to post a link to the tracers website.
It seems to be just a bunch of links to images taken by people who don't seem to have a clue how cameras work.
I've suggested to mr chemtrailorbs that he might benefit from a viewing of the following links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh
http://www.assap.ac.uk/newsite/htmlfiles/Photos.html
http://5cense.com/11/starlingo_i.htm
http://5cense.com/11/starlingo_ii.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_confusion
http://www.thephotoargus.com/inspira...h-photography/
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks