Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 161 to 185 of 185

Thread: Chemtrail Lawsuit

  1. #161
    Member Danny55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    263
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
    Hope he lets the US taxman know about all his profit from the sales.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Danny55 For This Useful Post:

    tryblinking (October 9th, 2012)

  3. #162
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,466
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 774 Times in 455 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Danny55 View Post
    Hope he lets the US taxman know about all his profit from the sales.
    That's how they got Al Capone, in the end.....
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  4. #163
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,466
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 774 Times in 455 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick View Post
    They have apparently submitted a FOIA request to the NOAA:

    http://www.facebook.com/groups/chemt...2009634193289/
    I wonder how they will handle what they actually get.
    This was sent in July. There would have been a response in 30 days. The Lawsuit group isn't being honest to their members.
    Every item on the request mentioned aluminum, barium, and strontium, so they will be told that NOAA has nothing.
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  5. #164
    Member Danny55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    263
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
    Her is the abbreviated response Jay. I posted it up here, somewhere, at the time. 25/08/2012.

    Quote Content from external source:

    COPY/PASTE EMAIL:

    Joe Marman
    2:18 PM (10 hours ago)

    ...

    to me

    Rob, I could get some of the responses I got from the Govt on my FOIA requests. I received two responses, where the Govt (Defense and NOAA) says that they have no information whatsoever on Chem trials or any of the spraying programs. I could have you post those letters.

    • Joe will get those to us asap. He's really busy, but I know he'll make time for us next moment he gets. Give it a day or two.


    See more

    LikeUnlike · · Follow postUnfollow post · 25 August at 09:24

  6. #165
    Administrator Mick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    8,746
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked 1,868 Times in 1,214 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Bit of a change on the lawsuit group. Robert Forgette is stepping aside, and Amie Lou and Kathryn O'Shannahan will be stepping in to administer the group. All the other admins removed.

    Quote Content from external source:



    Robert M Forgette

    9/8/2012 Image of sky over my house in Corona, CA.
    So let me get this straight... Is this the real problem here or is it me that's the problem? Seems a global effort to disburse this air crap far outweighs my involvement. When did I become so important? I'm just the guy trying to hold this nightmare together. Whatever....



    By Robert M Forgette in WANTED: Aerial Sample of Chemtrails. Know a Pilot??

    Robert M Forgette
    All I do know is, without any sort of instruction manual on THE RIGHT WAY TO DO THIS... I've done my best. That's all that matters now. Peace! If anyone else thinks they can do this better, I'd gladly let them give it a whirl. You can c
    ome in as the Hero, bust your ass and in the end... Find that you only get slandered for your efforts as well... Anyone? I'm at my whits end. Perhaps I'm missing the mark or simply am not qualified to do this? I'll be the first to tell you I have no idea what to do.... I just do what my heart tells me is the right thing is all. I rely on others to help guide this entire group (if I trust them). I'm no magician by any means. I'm tired f this and if someone else can get us to the final destination better than me, that's all I care about... The result. Matters little who's in charge as long as this proceeds with honesty and good faith.

    Chemtrail Geoengineering Lawsuit UPDATE:
    ■I just found someone to take this in the direction which is needed. She will be addressing this group tomorrow and putting an end to all of this BS.

    ■There will be no more drama, distractions or allowances for people to slander here after she sets up.
    ■The administrative positions will be assigned to (3) people only Amie Lou, Kathryn O'Shannahan and myself and will remain that way until she feels the need to make further changes.
    ■Many of you know Amie Lou she'll now pick up where I'm leaving off.
    ■I believe she's way more qualified to handle this mess than I am.
    ■Changes begin now and her address to this group, laying out how this will run, will be made tomorrow at the latest.
    ■I've allowed myself to be put in a defense position and perhaps the one's doing it have outsmarted me. To those people... Good luck trying to undo this group once she steps in.
    Peace.

  7. #166
    Member Danny55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    263
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
    Seems like Katherine has got no idea whatsoever about the chemistry and physics she tutored.
    "contrails are a mix of jet fuel exhaust and water...mostly water. That's why they're called Con trails...as in condensation trails. This is why they evaporated so quickly and are short...ALWAYS directly behind the craft they came from. ONLY jets make a contrail, only at high altitude and only in specific weather conditions."

    "Understand that a prop plane cannot form a contrail because it is NOT a jet."

    "My ex husband is a 727 captain (of 16 years) and we know more commercial airline pilots who ask the same question. "WTF are they spraying us with?" Don't come here making shit up and calling it science. Either step up or step aside."

    Followed by various Chemtrail videos, including the Supertanker and the research aircraft ones.

  8. #167
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,466
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 774 Times in 455 Posts
    More soap opera. I see Al Dicicco is filing a complaint against Joe Marman because he had no update. The new admin is just going for FOIA requests. I've seen this kind of romper room before. The power sometimes goes to extremists who ban like crazy, all memory of advances in knowledge is lost, and after awhile the place falls apart. Chemtrailcentral.com is an example. For about 4 years it was the go-to place with thousands of members and good discussion. Dead-enders got in power and restricted things to groupthink and used a heavy hand. It got a whole less interesting, and old timers left in droves.

    These folks have no memory of the promises made by Michael J. Murphy in MAY OF 2011 that Joe Marman was beginning a lawsuit.

    One year, four months later............................nada, except that Michael J. Murphy mentioned it at the conference, and nobody asked him what happened over the past year+??
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  9. #168
    Member Danny55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    263
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
    Think you're correct Jay. Already seeing one of the new admins bear a resemblance to a certain character from the film "Porky's".

  10. #169
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,466
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 774 Times in 455 Posts
    It looks like there are significant problems with this lawsuit.
    1. They have no evidence.
    2. Lacking evidence, the attorney is unable to develop a strategy for pursuing the case.
    3. Even if the above two hurdles were crossed, six people will be needed to be responsible for legal costs incurred by the State of California when the case is found frivolous.

    Bottom line seems to be that despite claims of a lawsuit in progress, nothing has been done at all, and likely nothing ever will be done, just as in all previous claims of lawsuits.

    =============
    Law Offices of
    Joseph H. Marman, Esq.
    8421 Auburn Blvd., Suite 145
    Attorney at Law Citrus Heights, CA 95610-0394 (916) 721-3324
    E-mail: [email protected] Fax (916) 721-3633
    Member: California Consumer Attorneys, Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association, Sacramento County Bar Assn., Placer County Bar Assn..

    December 18, 2012

    Hello fellow Chem Trial activists and potential plaintiffs in my lawsuit

    Re: Chem Trail Lawsuit


    I wanted to give an idea of what we are facing.

    To clarify what I plan on doing. I have been an attorney for 25 years and I have my own law office. I have two staff people, and I am very busy with my regular paying clients, so the Chem Trail lawsuit has to take a backseat to when I have time to present it since I am not charging anything for my time in doing this. If we win the case and attorneys fees are awarded at the end of the suit, I will seek my hourly rate from the government.

    I am not going to file a class action suit, since that is expensive to notify all potential members of the class. I intend to have 4-10 named plaintiffs, which will be easier for me to notify of the litigation events and processes. I intend to file a California state lawsuit against the government agencies responsible for protecting our health, which I believe so far are the California Air Resources Board and the California EPA. I will periodically notify the Facebook page once we get our case going. I am required to file a Government Claim first as an administrative requirement, and then the Claim is rejected and then we proceed to a lawsuit.

    We cannot just file a suit without any direct evidence, and then hope to win because we are upset that the government is spraying us. We have no direct evidence so far, that I have seen to prove exactly who is spraying us, until we catch them with the chemicals dripping out of the tail pipes.

    At this point all we do have for evidence is that the main 3 elements of barium, strontium and aluminum are being found in extreme amounts in our water, snow and perhaps blood. In my mind, we can only sue the government for failure to take the proper steps that they are mandated to do of investigating contaminants that may affect our health. Be aware also that there is a California Government Code § 818.2 that specifies that “A public entity is not liable for an injury caused by adopting or failing to adopt an enactment or by failing to enforce any law” This may be a big problem for us, and I need to research how to get around that law prior to filing any lawsuit.

    Be advised that the losing party in lawsuits may have a judgment entered against them for the costs put forth in defending the case, which in this case would be the California government, so be advised that if we lose, you may be hit with being responsible to pay the State of California’s costs of defending the lawsuit. Be further advised that I need to get about 6 Claimants to list as claimants in the Government claim first, then those claims are typically automatically rejected by the government agencies, and then we have 6 months from that date to file our lawsuit.

    Joseph H. Marman
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  11. #170
    Member TWCobra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    319
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 169 Times in 81 Posts
    "no direct evidence....". The hallmark of chemtrail theory.
    It is a capital Mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. - Sherlock Holmes

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TWCobra For This Useful Post:

    JRBids (April 7th, 2013),lotek (April 8th, 2013)

  13. #171
    Senior Member JRBids's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    774
    Thanks
    641
    Thanked 183 Times in 133 Posts

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to JRBids For This Useful Post:

    Belfrey (April 6th, 2013)

  15. #172
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,466
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 774 Times in 455 Posts
    So, another effort at legitimizing chemtrails has failed.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	lawsuitfail.JPG 
Views:	5 
Size:	73.4 KB 
ID:	2198

    They claim that they cannot get people onboard because chemtrails are "just too big"?

    Doesn't quite make sense, the bigger a thing gets the broader the opposition......

    The facts of the matter are that from the beginning running through to the end, Al Dicicco has been less than fully honest about his claims that anyone has out-of-ordinary barium blood levels. If that had been true, doctors worldwide (and greedy lawyers) would have worked up a lawsuit within days.

    Dicicco's problem could not be covered up forever. As soon as people got in deep enough, they checked out his 'evidence' and found that he had been covering up, that his claims of abnormal barium blood levels were bogus, and eventually the house of cards had to fall.

    It's very simple.
    You lie, you lose.
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Reynolds For This Useful Post:

    lotek (April 8th, 2013)

  17. #173
    Moderator HappyMonday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    498
    Thanks
    815
    Thanked 126 Times in 80 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Reynolds View Post

    They claim that they cannot get people onboard because chemtrails are "just too big"?
    Dishonest to the last. The self pity many of these people wallow in when their sham show-pieces fail makes me angry.

  18. #174
    Senior Member Cairenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,912
    Thanks
    684
    Thanked 380 Times in 300 Posts
    There has already been a class action lawsuit filed in the Mayflower spill.
    "Knowledge is the antidote for fear."

  19. #175
    Member Ross Marsden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    232
    Thanks
    238
    Thanked 104 Times in 55 Posts
    Call me stupid, and maybe I'm not the only one, but I don't understand this simile:
    Targeting Geoengineering in the form of a Lawsuit, is like targeting a fly on an iceberg...
    As far as I know this is the first usage of "target a fly on an iceberg". Is is the oppossite of "fish in a barrel"?

    Is it geoengineering or the lawsuit that is represented by the fly?

    I don't get it. Could someone explain?

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ross Marsden For This Useful Post:

    justanairlinepilot (May 22nd, 2013),lotek (April 8th, 2013)

  21. #176
    Senior Member JRBids's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    774
    Thanks
    641
    Thanked 183 Times in 133 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Reynolds View Post

    They claim that they cannot get people onboard because chemtrails are "just too big"?
    So it wasn't just that people who spend all day in their parents basement (except when they pop their head out to photograph a "chemtrail" sunset) posting on a computer don't have any money to donate to "the cause"?

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to JRBids For This Useful Post:

    lotek (April 8th, 2013)

  23. #177
    Senior Member JRBids's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    774
    Thanks
    641
    Thanked 183 Times in 133 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ross Marsden View Post
    Call me stupid, and maybe I'm not the only one, but I don't understand this simile:


    As far as I know this is the first usage of "target a fly on an iceberg". Is is the oppossite of "fish in a barrel"?

    Is it geoengineering or the lawsuit that is represented by the fly?

    I don't get it. Could someone explain?
    First I thought it meant "really easy", cause the fly is black and the iceberg is white.
    Then I though, "really hard", cause the fly it tiny and the iceberg is really big.

    So, no.

  24. #178
    Member captfitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    97
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 38 Times in 25 Posts
    I think it means: like contrails, a fly is completely harmless on an iceberg. So there is no reason to kill it.

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to captfitch For This Useful Post:

    JRBids (April 8th, 2013)

  26. #179
    Senior Member Jay Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,466
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 774 Times in 455 Posts
    I think they meant the fly is too small yet it is steering the iceberg so well that they simply could not stop it. They seem such helpless victims, even against a fly.
    "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ...Mark Twain

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Reynolds For This Useful Post:

    JRBids (April 8th, 2013),Ross Marsden (April 8th, 2013)

  28. #180
    Member lotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    337
    Thanks
    439
    Thanked 221 Times in 124 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Reynolds View Post
    If that had been true, doctors worldwide (and greedy lawyers) would have worked up a lawsuit within days.
    This might as well be from the mouth of god. this is so exacting and would absolutely be the case if ti were real. EVERY Saul Goodman attorney at law would be clambering for blood tests and social security numbers to represent.

    right? we are all zionist pigs after that dollar according to many CT pushers...
    Y U NO Lrn2Science?!?

  29. The Following User Says Thank You to lotek For This Useful Post:

    JRBids (May 11th, 2013)

  30. #181
    Member M Bornong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 19 Times in 10 Posts
    Looks like they are giving up.

    Name:  Untitled1.jpg
Views: 107
Size:  128.7 KB

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to M Bornong For This Useful Post:

    lotek (May 11th, 2013)

  32. #182
    Member Ross Marsden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    232
    Thanks
    238
    Thanked 104 Times in 55 Posts
    I can remember if I donated or not. dang

  33. #183
    Member Boston's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    89
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 33 Times in 24 Posts
    Interesting read, I'd question even if they had evidence of elevated levels of Ba, Sr or Al, even though that question would be based on a small sampling of reviewed articles on the subject. It would seem their claims of these findings are based of citizen science that is often flawed unless directed by a trained professional.
    Innocent Bystander

  34. The Following User Says Thank You to Boston For This Useful Post:

    Ross Marsden (May 22nd, 2013)

  35. #184
    Member Ross Marsden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    232
    Thanks
    238
    Thanked 104 Times in 55 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston View Post
    Interesting read, I'd question even if they had evidence of elevated levels of Ba, Sr or Al, even though that question would be based on a small sampling of reviewed articles on the subject. It would seem their claims of these findings are based of citizen science that is often flawed unless directed by a trained professional.
    (emphasis is mine)

    Doesn't that very neatly summarise the whole chemtrail meme.

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to Ross Marsden For This Useful Post:

    HappyMonday (May 23rd, 2013)

  37. #185
    Member M Bornong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Bakersfield, CA
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 19 Times in 10 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston View Post
    Interesting read, I'd question even if they had evidence of elevated levels of Ba, Sr or Al, even though that question would be based on a small sampling of reviewed articles on the subject. It would seem their claims of these findings are based of citizen science that is often flawed unless directed by a trained professional.
    Here's a recent example of someone gathering a sample, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EG4izbL74oM , I'm no scientist, but doesn't printers ink most likely contain some aluminum and/or barium...? I hope he publishes his results, it was part of a Global Skywatch thread, I'd like to see his results.

    Here are the results of an unrelated test, no details given in how the sample was collected,

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	results.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	263.0 KB 
ID:	2998

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Gravatar as Default Avatar by 1e2.it