I have attempted to contact Russell L. Blaylock, M.D. , (a board certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer.)
I started this post in the hopes he would engage here, to discuss his research.
Here is the email I sent to him:
Here is his contention, according to the internet. (>>I cannot find the original link to this quote)....Dr Blaylock,
I would like to invite you to enter a discussion to help explain the neurotoxicity of aluminum, specifically in airborne aluminum nano particles.
To be fair, honest, and forewarned, there will be a number of disbelievers amongst this internet crowd of varied professions., but I encourage you to
help support your research by your proactive approach on the subject.
Here is the pertinent link/thread, that I have specifically started for you (forgive my indulgence)....
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&....0.kNgiNEwu2Ns"The Internet is littered with stories of chemtrails and geoengineering to combat global warming and until recently I took these stories with a grain of salt. One of the main reasons for my skepticism was that I rarely saw what they were describing in the skies. But over the past several years I have notice a great number of these trails and I have to admit they are not like the contrails I grew up seeing in the skies. They are extensive, quite broad, are laid in a definite pattern and slowly evolve into artificial clouds. Of particular concern is that there are now so many* dozens every day are littering the skies.
My major concern is that there is evidence that they are spraying tons of nano-sized aluminum compounds........."(snip)
My first question to Dr Blaylock is, "If there is evidence of aluminum toxicity, how do you attribute it to an airborne source?"