I did do a search on Bilderbergers and of the 3 hits on Metabunk I found I could not get logged in to reply to any of them no matter how many times I tried. I don't know if its because they are older posts (2011) or what but I can’t get logged in to reply to them but I can start a new thread or reply to something recent ergo my posting this under the forum section titled
Conspiracy Theories
The New World Order, 9/11, Monsanto, Bilderbergers, and everything conspiratorial
The question is why is there nothing posted about Debunking the Bilderberg Group and/or its Annual Conference?
Of the 3 threads I found (and was unable to reply to) I did see where Mick (MetaBunk.org Admin) replied asking "When did anyone say that Bilderberg Did Not Exits" and also posted some old news paper clippings.
(This is for Mick) If you are saying that you don't know of any instances of a public figure or entity (i.e. a major news media outlet or persona) calling the Bilderberg Group and or its meeting a conspiracy theory then either you're outright lying or you're not as informed about current events as one would be lead to believe by your numerous posts.
The undeniable facts
- There is a group (yes I know it’s a private organization) of very powerful individuals from a varied background including major world leaders, titans of industry, captains of international financing and even royalty like Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands who has been in attendance at most if not every conference the group has had since its start.
- The majority of the main stream media outlets including broadcast TV and radio as well as the rags (newspapers, magazines) have at one time or another thru at least one representative of that entity be they an anchor or a reporter, have either dismissed such a group/meeting existed and or called the “Bilderberg Group/Meeting” a Conspiracy Theory. Trying to imply that no such denial has occurred across the whole of the news media is at best incompetent and at worst deceptive.
Now that the group and its meeting have been exposed enough in large scale media (i.e. the London Guardian ) the attempts to deny the group and or its meeting exist have stopped. At this point why try to deny it exists. The existence of such a group and its annual meeting separate from what the group does and its proclaimed power, and the fact that it’s NOT been annual reported on by most of the media outlets up until the last few years is enough for us all to take pause and ask WHY? The fact that it is a private group does NOT change the fact that its beyond illogical that the news outlets did not at least have 1 reporter on site to report at each annual meeting. Why? Because that’s what the media does. Even the infamous paparazzi, save for a few who do not accept what the media tells them as fact, avoided this gathering of the world’s most powerful elite.
Mick, as well as any other debunker out there, answer me this one simple question. How is it that an annual meeting like the Bilderbergers, that consists of a collection of hundreds of the world’s most wealthy and powerful, can occur every year for decades and not be reported on annually by at least the major news outlets if not more news media? And please don’t say it’s because it’s a private meeting. Being private has never before kept out investigative reporters.
Reply With Quote
Content from external source:
Originally Posted by MikeC 
Bookmarks