Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 121 to 133 of 133

Thread: How does a logical, relatively explainable world deal with membrane theory?

  1. #121
    Member Trigger Hippie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    359
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 154 Times in 91 Posts
    Still nothing to debunk, except to say that the paranormal, by definition, lies beyond the realm of science. Perhaps you have evidence that ghosts are a phenomenon of quantum mechanics? ESP is a manifestation string theory?
    Last edited by Trigger Hippie; October 18th, 2012 at 08:52 AM.

  2. #122
    Moderator George B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas, SC, Tennessee
    Posts
    3,573
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 206 Times in 168 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Trigger Hippie View Post
    Still nothing to debunk. Do you have any solid evidence that connects theoretical physics to the paranormal?

    (BTW, the paranormal, by definition, lies beyond the realm of science)
    That was probably true before the uncertainty and variability introduced into science by the implications represented by colliding membranes and interaction with multi-universes or parallel universes, etc. . . . these uncertainties can lead to unpredictability and non-reproducible phenomenon . . . the paranormal is now allowable . . .
    The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B

  3. #123
    Member Trigger Hippie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    359
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 154 Times in 91 Posts
    Apologies, I edited my post before you reply. You may want to read it again.

  4. #124
    Moderator George B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas, SC, Tennessee
    Posts
    3,573
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 206 Times in 168 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Trigger Hippie View Post
    Still nothing to debunk, except to say that the paranormal, by definition, lies beyond the realm of science. Perhaps you have evidence that ghosts are a phenomenon of quantum mechanics? ESP is a manifestation string theory?
    No, nor do I have any solid evidence that M-Theory exists except for mathematical formulas . . . but I have thousands of years of human testimony that the paranormal exists and by logical extension think along with some scientists that such a connection exists . . .

    Quote Content from external source:

    William A. Tiller, Ph.D. is a professor emeritus of Materials Science and Engineering at Stanford University.[1] He is also the author of Science and Human Transformation, a book on esoteric concepts such as subtle energies, beyond the four fundamental forces, which he believes act in concert with human consciousness. Tiller appeared in the 2004 film What the Bleep Do We Know
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_A._Tiller

    Books


    The Science of Crystallization: Macroscopic Phenomena and Defect Generation, Cambridge University Press, 1991, ISBN 978-0-521-38828-3 [1]
    The Science of Crystallization: Microscopic Interfacial Phenomena, Cambridge University Press, 1991 (reprinted 1995), ISBN 978-0-521-38827-6 [2]
    Psychoenergetic Science: A Second Copernican-Scale Revolution, Pavior Publishers, 2007, ISBN 978-1-4243-3863-4
    Some Science Adventures with Real Magic, Pavior Publishers, 2005, ISBN 1-929331-11-8
    Conscious Acts of Creation: The Emergence of a New Physics, Pavior Publishers, 2001, ISBN 1-929331-05-3
    Science and Human Transformation: Subtle Energies, Intentionality and Consciousness, Pavior Publishers, 1997, ISBN 0-9642637-4-2
    Foreword to Matrix Energetics: The Science and Art of Transformation, Atria Books, 2007, Richard Bartlett ISBN 978-1-58270-163-9
    Last edited by George B; October 18th, 2012 at 09:20 AM.
    The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B

  5. #125
    Member Trigger Hippie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    359
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 154 Times in 91 Posts
    Ok, if I understand this, you believe anecdotal evidence somehow connects bleeding edge theoretical physics to ghosts and other assorted woo. Despite three pages of spooky hand waving and half baked notions of multi-dimensional quantum mysticism there's still nothing to debunk.

  6. #126
    Moderator George B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas, SC, Tennessee
    Posts
    3,573
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 206 Times in 168 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Trigger Hippie View Post
    Ok, if I understand this, you believe anecdotal evidence somehow connects bleeding edge theoretical physics to ghosts and other assorted woo. Despite three pages of spooky hand waving and half baked notions of multi-dimensional quantum mysticism there's still nothing to debunk.
    And if you believe that I guess you have done your due diligence . . . have a good day . . .
    The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B

  7. #127
    Moderator George B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas, SC, Tennessee
    Posts
    3,573
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 206 Times in 168 Posts
    I am not the only person to make the possible connection . . .

    Quote Content from external source:


    String Theory, Universal Mind, and the Paranormal *


    Brian D. Josephson
    Department of Physics, University of Cambridge


    Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Rd, Cambridge CB3 0HE, U.K.


    http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10
    http://arxiv.org/html/physics/0312012

    http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10




    ABSTRACT


    A model consistent with string theory is proposed for so-called paranormal phenomena such as extra-sensory perception (ESP). Our mathematical skills are assumed to derive from a special ‘mental vacuum state’, whose origin is explained on the basis of anthropic and biological arguments, taking into account the need for the informational processes associated with such a state to be of a life-supporting character. ESP is then explained in terms of shared ‘thought bubbles’ generated by the participants out of the mental vacuum state. The paper concludes with a critique of arguments sometimes made claiming to ‘rule out’ the possible existence of paranormal phenomena.

    Last edited by George B; October 18th, 2012 at 10:32 AM.
    The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B

  8. #128
    Moderator George B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas, SC, Tennessee
    Posts
    3,573
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 206 Times in 168 Posts
    The concept of the paranormal and physics has been popularized as well . . .

    http://www.squidoo.com/parallel-universes
    The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B

  9. #129
    Senior Member scombrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    587
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 126 Times in 74 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by George B View Post
    The paper concludes with a critique of arguments sometimes made claiming to ‘rule out’ the possible existence of paranormal phenomena.
    His concluding remarks responding to criticism amount to hand-waving apologetics.

  10. #130
    Senior Member MikeC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,744
    Thanks
    191
    Thanked 356 Times in 250 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by George B View Post

    I will give it a try . . .

    Does the existence of M-theory, Super String Theory, etc. change the tone and subject matter allowed on the discussion of the nature of reality . . . and thus is the paranormal now a scientifically valid research subject . . . one which we should take more seriously and invest more time, money and credibility?
    any subject matter can be "a scientifically valid research subject" - "scientifically valid" means following a braod set of procedures, and applying a certain system of logic to reach a conclusion

    It has nothing whatsoever to do withthe subject matter.

    You aer free to conduct "scientficially valid research" into pink unicorns, robot cats, chemtrails, god, ghosts, ESP or quantum mechanics.

    And when you have used valid technique to obtain some data you can apply valid analytics to the data to come up with a valid conclusion.

    The "trouble" with doing thsi for paranormal stuff, god, esp, pink unicorns, etc., is that the data you get from valid collection techniques is such that the only valid conclusion you can reach is "there is no scientific evidence that this (these) exist"

    And when that is the result of repetitive iscientific investigations into such topics, people rightly say "It's not worth bothering with unless you do have somethign actually new to look at".

    What you seem to be saying is that quantum physics, multi-verses and dimensions constitute something new to look at.

    And you may be right. But "a valid scientific research subject" wil not start with the presumption that various paranormal "things" can be explained by such - it will start with "let's see what we can find out about quantum physics, multiverses and dimensions" - if that then results in an explaination for something paranormal then that is well and good.

    But starting research hoping it wil show that these "explain" or "allow" the paranormal is nto a valid scientific method in the first place.

    Therefore, insofar as "real" scientists are investigating all these things to establish if they exist and what their relationship and interactions with "our universe" actually are, there IS "valid scientific research" going on that will provide evidence linking these with the paranormal - if there is any such evidence to be found.

    but hat research is being done in CERN, in the offices of theoretical mathematicians an the like - not on the 'net by enthusiasts or in highly publicised experiments for hte purpose by people who are generally charlatans.
    "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." -Pascal
    "It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley; but not at all so to believe or not in God" - Diderot

  11. #131
    Moderator George B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas, SC, Tennessee
    Posts
    3,573
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 206 Times in 168 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeC View Post
    any subject matter can be "a scientifically valid research subject" - "scientifically valid" means following a braod set of procedures, and applying a certain system of logic to reach a conclusion

    It has nothing whatsoever to do withthe subject matter.

    You aer free to conduct "scientficially valid research" into pink unicorns, robot cats, chemtrails, god, ghosts, ESP or quantum mechanics.

    And when you have used valid technique to obtain some data you can apply valid analytics to the data to come up with a valid conclusion.

    The "trouble" with doing thsi for paranormal stuff, god, esp, pink unicorns, etc., is that the data you get from valid collection techniques is such that the only valid conclusion you can reach is "there is no scientific evidence that this (these) exist"

    And when that is the result of repetitive iscientific investigations into such topics, people rightly say "It's not worth bothering with unless you do have somethign actually new to look at".

    What you seem to be saying is that quantum physics, multi-verses and dimensions constitute something new to look at.

    And you may be right. But "a valid scientific research subject" wil not start with the presumption that various paranormal "things" can be explained by such - it will start with "let's see what we can find out about quantum physics, multiverses and dimensions" - if that then results in an explaination for something paranormal then that is well and good.

    But starting research hoping it wil show that these "explain" or "allow" the paranormal is nto a valid scientific method in the first place.

    Therefore, insofar as "real" scientists are investigating all these things to establish if they exist and what their relationship and interactions with "our universe" actually are, there IS "valid scientific research" going on that will provide evidence linking these with the paranormal - if there is any such evidence to be found.

    but hat research is being done in CERN, in the offices of theoretical mathematicians an the like - not on the 'net by enthusiasts or in highly publicised experiments for hte purpose by people who are generally charlatans.
    Seems there are other options to do research other than at CERN and in the inner offices of theoretical mathematics . . .
    we are in the data collection stage . . . not in the design and experimentation stage . . .

    IMO paranormal events are unpredictable and not reproducible so usually defy any research attempt requiring such traits . . . however, this doesn't preclude research based on data collection and descriptive categorization as is common in cultural anthropology and primatology . . . one needs to first collect descriptive testimony and correlate it possibly with environmental data as in chronobiology . . . for example the Federal Reserve found a stastically valid correlation between solar storm activity and transaction activity on the securities market . . .


    We now have massive data collection and analysis capabilities never before realized . . . we need to be more imaginative in how to capture and describe the events and look for commonalities, trends, and correlations of location, date, environment, relationships, genetics and so forth . . .

    In other words . . . standard research approaches are not likely to be successful until more is understood on how the interaction of membranes and multi-universes work but descriptive collection and categorization of paranormal events and data analysis may lead to surprising relationships . . .
    Last edited by George B; October 18th, 2012 at 05:15 PM.
    The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B

  12. #132
    Senior Member MikeC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,744
    Thanks
    191
    Thanked 356 Times in 250 Posts
    Of course there are other options for research than CERN et al - my point is that what they are doing in the halls of advanced "serious" science is where the basis of any links will be initialy determined.

    "Standard research approaches" WILL be successful in finding the data that is there to be found. They are standard precisely because they are the best way of finding data. your examples ARE all standard research approaches!!

    Your condemnation of them as "not likely to be successful" seems to presuppose that "success" means they will establish that paranormal/mystical stuff does work through multi-verses, etc - and that presupposition is why your approach is not science.
    "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." -Pascal
    "It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley; but not at all so to believe or not in God" - Diderot

  13. #133
    Moderator George B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas, SC, Tennessee
    Posts
    3,573
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 206 Times in 168 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeC View Post
    Of course there are other options for research than CERN et al - my point is that what they are doing in the halls of advanced "serious" science is where the basis of any links will be initialy determined.

    "Standard research approaches" WILL be successful in finding the data that is there to be found. They are standard precisely because they are the best way of finding data. your examples ARE all standard research approaches!!

    Your condemnation of them as "not likely to be successful" seems to presuppose that "success" means they will establish that paranormal/mystical stuff does work through multi-verses, etc - and that presupposition is why your approach is not science.
    I disagree . . . the only thing I am implying is all existing approaches (over decades of investigation) used to find reproducibility and predictability in paranormal events has been unsuccessful so different approaches as I have suggested are in order . . . I suspect a possible reason for such difficulty is . . . paranormal events may follow multi-dimensional behavior, other explanations my simply be their behavioral rules are hidden in plain sight just like the example of plant genetics . . . just requires more patience and hard work . . .
    The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Gravatar as Default Avatar by 1e2.it