Share
Email
FacebookTwitterGoogle+PinterestLinkedInStumbleUponRedditGoogle BookmarksWordPressTumblrDeliciousDiggMessengerMySpaceYahoo BookmarksBeboMister-WongOrkutXINGBufferEvernoteNetvibes ShareStrandsBusiness ExchangePinboardArtoTipdSmakNewsPlurkAIMYahoo MessengerIdenti.caMozillacaDiasporaBlogger PostTypePad PostBox.netKindle ItNetlogTechnorati FavoritesCiteULikeJumptagsHemidemiFunPInstapaperPhoneFavsXerpiNetvouzWinkDiigoBibSonomyBlogMarksTailrankStartAidKledyKhabbrMeneameYoolinkBookmarks.frTechnotizieNewsVineMultiplyFriendFeedPlaxo PulsePingSquidooProtopage BookmarksBlinklistFavesYiGGWebnewsSegnaloPushaYouMobSlashdotFarkAllvoicesJamespotImera BrazilTwiddlaLinkaGoGounalogHuggDiglogNowPublicLiveJournalCurrentHelloTxtSpurlYampleOneviewLinkatopiaSimpyBuddyMarksAsk.com MyStuffViadeoMapleWistsConnoteaBackflipMyLinkVaultSiteJotSphinnDZoneCare2 NewsHyvesBitty BrowserOdnoklassnikiMail.ruGabbrSymbaloo FeedsTagzaFolkdNewsTrustAmazon Wish ListPrintFriendlyRead It LaterTuentiEmailRediff MyPage
9,011,554
GeoengineeringWatch.org
  • RSS Feed

Don’t Believe UV Radiation Levels are “Off the Charts”?

August 20, 2013     No comments
facts1
Like
Like
You and 68 others like this.68 people like this. Sign Up to see what your friends like.
Massive UV Levels Are Not So Easy To Hide. (Even if the disinfo agents lie about the facts)
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org
Most have already noticed how incredibly hot the sun feels in recent years. Bark is literally being burned off of trees in countless locations. Plants are stunted, gardens don’t produce in many regions, etc. Would global geoengineering negatively affect the ozone layer?
Yes
 
How many lies have we been told by the government, its agencies, main stream media, and paid dis-information trolls. Who do we believe? Do we believe them when they tell us all their readings on UV radiation show everything is fine? Even when we can feel with our own skin and senses the sun is too hot? 
Increasing UV radiation from ozone layer depletion
 
Do the “liars” lie about other things as well? What about nuclear fallout? Even after Fukushima blows and continues to spew radiation to this day, and is still getting worse? Do we believe government agencies, dis-information people and all their phony statements and impressive graphs of totally fictitious data telling us everything is “normal”? How about the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, lots of charts, graphs, and phony data there, more than anyone could even begin to digest. “Data”  saying everything is “safe” from too many sources to list, yet marine life and people continue to die in the gulf day in and day out in spite of everything being “fine”. What about the Exxon Valdez? How about the lead that used to be put in gasoline? That was fine till it wasn’t. DDT, that was completely safe we were told.  ”Agent Orange”? Vaccines? Cell Phones? Smart Meters? Safe, safe, safe, no need to worry. The cancers and diseases being caused “are not related” many dis-information people and agencies say.
How about geoengineering? Is it really going on? Well, “it can’t be because the government says it isn’t so”. They would never lie to us, would they? Even NASA says the chemical covered skies from global geoengineering are “safe and normal”. They have even set up special courses to teach our kids such despicable lies.
If UV radiation had gone “off the charts”, what might it do to our aquatic friends? Lets start with global plankton populations, the foundation for life on earth. Even NASA says high UV radiation would be really bad for these microscopic organisms.
 
So how are those plankton populations doing?
 
How about Krill populations? (Krill feed on phytoplankton)
(especially good article to review overall is below)
 
Wouldn’t this effect the food chain if plankton decline?
 
What about our larger ocean friends, wouldn’t excessive UV show up with them?
Excessive UV damage to marine life
Whales getting sunburnt
 
What about trees, would anything negative happen from excessive UVB?
 
Are we seeing problems with trees?
 
What would excessive ozone depletion and increase UV radiation do to us?
 
Is there northern hemisphere ozone depletion that we are not being told about by main stream media? 
 
HOW ABOUT OUR METERS AND THE MATH?
(A direct response to recent disinformation “hit piece” article”)
Here we are:
Our instruments are reading what they read whether someone likes it or not. They are nice, brand new instruments used for verifying medical sterilizers, UV curing ovens in semiconductor manufacturing, UV developing in offset printing.
Both instruments are 4% tolerance, both carry NIST traceability.
The meters Mick shows are mainly for reptile enclosure UV lamps, different class of instrument entirely.
If I were to choose the more trustworthy, I would pick mine, not those hobbyist units Mick referred to…
 
Mick:
Now, in space, sunlight is a total 1366 w/m2, which is 136.6 mW/cm2. That’s for ALL the radiation, visible, infrared, and ultraviolet.
UV makes up around 10% of that. about 14 mw/cm2
14 mW/cm2 In space!?!
Sorry Mick,
We are seeing up to 18mW/cm2 of combined UVA/UVB and at the same instant 7mW/cm2 of UVA.
And yes you can subtract the A from the A/B and get a good measurement of B.
In the end we can only convey what these instruments output.
 
He continues:
Actual total UV that hits the ground is normally around 3.2 mW/cm2. Most of this is UVA. Hence his UVA readings also seem to be entirely wrong.
How does he know how much is actually hitting the ground?
3.2mW/cm^2 doesn’t look like much.
We have other meters in place now, the same exact UV A/B meter I am using, which are also displaying high readings as high and higher than my own measurements.
 
Mick:
Which yet again is obviously totally impossible. The fact that his total UV was higher than UV in space should be enough to prove it wrong, but if you look at just the UVB, its four times the amount of UVB in space. Physically impossible.
That 1,366 W/m2 stuff was ditched in 1982 when they found out the instrument calibration was whacked….
Other values for the solar constant are found in historical literature with the value 1,353 W/m2 appearing in many publications. It is now generally believed that most of the historical discrepancies have been due to instrument calibration error (White, 1977). Recent satellite and rocket data (Duncan et al., 1982) and (Hickey et al., 1982) have confirmed that the 1,353 W/m2 value was low
 
Someone called “Stupid” also said another thing that is totally, dead wrong on Mick’s thread:
UV meters can get expensive…..but modern units are out there, with NIST Cert.
His old Omega unit was likely +10% or more off from NIST standards when brand new…..no telling how off it may be now.
Sorry Stupid, ours are brand new, 4%, NIST traceable…  You really assumed a lot considering you knew nothing about our instruments.
 
They go on to say that they couldn’t find any UV meter made by Omega…
Like this?:
 
And this is our UV A/B meter:
 
Again, neither meter is old, and both are at 4% accuracy with NIST traceability
 
They might also like to know about this:
His column shows UVA, UV A/B, and UVC. They say they had two meters, so how are they are getting three numbers? Presumably something must measure UV C as well as something else.
 
We get those 3 numbers by having one of our meters supplied with 2 sensors.
 
OK, here’s the meter Mick’s people are referring to:
It is mainly sold to reptile enthusiasts, not very professional looking either, and I bet Mick doesn’t even have one.
 
 Roger Foote
Foote Control Systems
40 years in wireless environmental monitoring and measurement and industrial controls.
20 of those years in government agency work, 20 years private consulting including precision electronics design and manufacturing with customers world wide.
 
SO WHAT IS THE BOTTOM LINE?
There are articles out there to tell people anything they might want to hear, and agencies that exist to lie about obvious and glaring truths with official approval by their governments. There are “bottom of the barrel” paid disinformation “trolls” that live of their efforts to tarnish the truth with impressive looking charts and graphs. From the fictitious “recovering economy”, to Fukushima lies, environmental cover ups, etc etc. Lots of impressive looking data that ads up to total disinformation. Primary disinformation paid trolls have said for years there is no geoengineering, no increase in droughts, no increase in floods, no increase in wildfires, etc etc. The increase in UV radiation story hit a nerve as we thought it would. This issue is very dire and can not be hidden once widely known. Attempts to “debunk” our data on the extremely high UV levels were expected.
If you care about the truth, if you care about protecting the planets ability to continue sustaining life, if you care about our collective futures, do some research yourself. Look at the links above. Remember that you can always find conflicting data, but what does the reality on the ground, combined with available research studies, lead you to believe in regard to who has it right with the facts and who is lying their backsides off?
DW
 
 
 
 

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Visitors To This Site

    9,011,556

  • The Man On The Street

  • Activist Articles

    • contrail

      Chem-Trail Versus Con-Trail

      My neighbor looked up, noticing the lines of clouds in the sky. There were five and another being added as we watched. “Chem-trails.” I said with

  • These Jets are Spraying Aerosols

  • Government Document: “Weather as a Force Multiplier”

  • Newest Film by Michael Murphy

  • Get the Original Film

  • Search This Site

  • Archives

  • 1966 Government Weather Modification Document

  • The 36,000 member Institute of Physics

    “Climate geoengineering at scale must be considered only as a last resort…There should be no lessening of attempts to otherwise correct the harmful impacts of human economies on the Earth’s ecology and climate.”

  • Rosalie Bertell, Grey Nun of the Sacred Heart

    Rosalie Bertell, Grey Nun of the Sacred Heart, received her Ph. D. degree in Biometrics with minors in Biology and Biochemistry from the Catholic University of America, in 1966. She is the founder of the International Concern for Public Health (IICPH), a founding member of the International Commission of Health Professionals, and the International Association of Humanitarian Medicine. She has identified a covert spray program, identical to what citizens are saying, and geoengineering scientists are DENYING. Here is ONE interview with Sister Dr. Bertell.

  • Government Document “Geoengineering Governance and Technology”

  • Info Cards

admin
Powered by WordPress