J
Joe
Guest
Move on then . There are plenty of other post .This conversation (with Joe) is going nowhere.
Let's park it, hey?
Move on then . There are plenty of other post .This conversation (with Joe) is going nowhere.
Let's park it, hey?
Then I guess the phone call is off ? I did delete that post Jay . and quite a few other ones . My point is your being rude from the beginning has never helped Im only trying to point out where you failed with me so it might help you in the future . Im also trying to play devils advocate and I guess Im just pissing people off . Why else would I be here ? To make friends ? The chemtrail theory is growing being on TV and in movies People are eating it up . Iv changed on a lot more things then you think . Maybe you can make a film of your own ? OK let me crawl back in my grave Bye Jay its been a blastJoe, not my people, I voted for Bush, twice.
.
Yes, they think that because of a pack of lies. You know most of the lies right now. You don't care.
Joe you don't know how many I have succeeded with, but I can tell you it has been thousands, maybe tens of thousands. Some of them have become good friends. I get mail from former believers, that keeps me going. I know that Mick and others have gotten the same sort of appreciation.
If any chemtrail believer ever sent you thanks for bringing them into the world of chemtrails, you played a part in their deception.
I suppose that you can be proud of that and absolve yourself. You don't care. I understand. I'll let it go for now. I hate what you are doing, even if I must allow you to aid in destruction in more ways than you know. You aren't worth any more of my trouble at this point. You are dead to me.
Bye.
Well, just because more folks are believing it, STILL doesn't make it TRUE. It is still a HOAX being pushed by a combination of true believers and scam artists and attention seekers.
They use you and others to promote their agenda.
Nobody uses me ? http://treasurecoastskywatch.blogspot.com/Well, just because more folks are believing it, STILL doesn't make it TRUE. It is still a HOAX being pushed by a combination of true believers and scam artists and attention seekers.
They use you and others to promote their agenda.
that wasnt a hoax it was a experiment . Geoengineering isnt a Hoax . I just save what I feel is relevent for the future . Kind of like saving peoples facebook post and YT post for something that hasnt happened but most likely never will .It was an EXPERIMENT, They did ONE test. Why are you continuing to insist that there are hundreds, if not thousands of such flights every day and that they were started before that ONE, SINGLE. LONE test.
You are promoting a hoax, you can kid yourself otherwise, but the fact is still there. What you are telling folks are 'chem trails' are just ordinary contrails
that wasnt a hoax it was a experiment . Geoengineering isnt a Hoax . I just save what I feel is relevent for the future . Kind of like saving peoples facebook post and YT post for something that hasnt happened but most likely never will .
A little more of this might help
Yes because chemtrails sound like poison which is bad . Iv tried to steer away from anything that contains the word chemtrails on my site which gets very little traffic . Just over 10.000 hits in 2 years isnt much . Just because I think they are geoengineering now I dont feel threatened in anyway because of it . Thats why I posted the picure of Obama with the persistant contrails above his head . You would expose the POTUS to something harmful . To me Its just annoying living in the Sunshine state with less sunshine . If they arent geoengineering now then it will only get worse ? even less sunshine ? sucks if you have solar panels .Then you admit that calling con trails, chem trails is wrong and inaccurate.
Just because something MIGHT could happen, is not a reason to tell folks it is happening.
It doesnt only weather modification .Sorry, as an ignorant old fool, I just do not see how the E-PEACE experiment on Aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in stratocumulus clouds supports the chemtrail story. Yes, I read the report and in my layman's view its not much different, if really at all, from that of normal cloud seeding. Monitoring smoke generators and merchant shipping exhaust plumes and their affects on relatively low attitude clouds plus the seeding of same cloud types with granulated salt doesn't compare to the hype of chemtrails and the shady mysterious aerosols allegedly being ejected at over twice that altitude. I found the report interesting and informative.
Eric
Yes I did watch it and felt he sounded honest . Made him even likable . Which was why i posted it . Like I said if they had more open debates like this i might help .Did you watch the entire interview with David Keith?
When I last saw that video, I thought David Keith raises some really valid points. He puts what theorists typically bring up into the perspective, such as the logistical and paper trails involved if there were ever a covert project. He explains how science works and how it operates, and he explains the relevance and irrelevance of patents. He also explains the science behind contrails and why they change. If anything, I think he admirably explains the misconceptions with the chemtrail theory. Without dismissing it entirely, he explains the implausibilities of some of the theories brought up, and as any neutral person of wisdom, this is the most rational way to approach the issue. He doesn't take sides.
I'm not sure if you actually watched it, but if you haven't watched it from start to finish, you should try. If you have, watch it again, and keep an open mind for David Keith. He may be a 'geoengineer' by his work, and I'm sure MJM's videos have painted him in a bad light, but if you only try to see things from his perspective, you might discover that he isn't exactly what some folks paint him to be. In fact, I think he is a pretty reasonable and nice guy.
The reduction of the world's combustion of fossil fuels can be achieved slowly by such GEOENGINEERING means, .....
Perhaps I expressed myself badly. I can't edit it now.I am not sure that is what you meant to say?? Salt-seeding clouds does nothing at all to combustion of fossil fuels - that is an entirely different matter, IMO one that shuold be strongly persued regardless of other geoengineering.
Yes. The oceans cover more than two-thirds of the Earth. The southern oceans (especially far South) aren't within Man's domain, and large enough to be effective, yet inconveniencing very few people.I was thinking the other night, that if one wanted to 'geoengineer' the climate, that it would have to be done over the oceans, not over the land. The oceans are where a lot of the 'weather' and thus climate 'starts. If there was anything to chem trails, they would be doing in far out at sea, not over Dallas or St Louis.
Not a cheap setup, .
What is money if you truly believed you are fighting "The Greatest Crime in History, a Crime Against Humanity!".
Dane Wigington claims he has spent over $50,000 on chemtrails,
he claims that hundreds of "chemtrails" flights pass overhead, but he steals photos from Airliners.net to show on his website......
His results (with lots more on his Flickr page)Hello, First and foremost turn off the feature for the 4x digital enhancement as the end result is way too noisy. I shoot RAW plus JPEG using AV mode and pretty much stick to F8 and ISO 80 settings.
Also dont try using the LCD use the viewfinder, I find you can steady yourself and track the trails much easier. Finally, you really need to do a little manipulation with the images crop and sharpen mainly and I use the Adobe Lightroom 4 product. I too have only had the camera fo about a month so am also on a learning curve but I have had quite a bit of experience with a Canon DSLR and a 400mm EX lens. I still find the results you can get from the little Canon SX amazing for the price. Hope that helps.
it was a joke ? its saturday nite relax .The BIG problem is that the CT is NOT open minded to the FACTS. They are open minded to theories and opinions and they closed their minds when the facts are shown to them. Otherwise, please explain all the times that someone challenging them get their comments deleted and then blocked. Can you explain that?
Try this one . I'm too old to relax--hahahah
Dane Wigington has more than enough money to buy any camera setup a person could ever wish for. He could set up a network of 100 people nationwide taking photos of planes and identifying them.Maybe we should start a fund raiser to send one to Dane
Dane Wigington has more than enough money to buy any camera setup a person could ever wish for. He could set up a network of 100 people nationwide taking photos of planes and identifying them.
Dane Wigington accuses all 14,000 members of the American Meteorological Society of either being part of the chemtrail conspiracy and "afraid to take a stand", or people who "live in bubbles of their own creation".
Yet he has built his own bubble and won't dare it get pricked by staying vague on the identity of the 100+ planes which fly over his house every day. He knows that to begin identifying the planes will be the end for him.
That is why we need to press this point as hard as possible.