scombrid
Senior Member.
You keep running around in circles. First you say that pollutants and carbon emissions need to be curbed. Now you say that even though the CAA is good and works, it doesn't save the world from Global Warming. Only legislation of CO2 can save the world from Global Warming when it is considered among scientists now to be a pollutant. I think it is you who needs to get facts straight here...
Fact 1: CAA has worked for regulated pollutants.
Fact 2: CAA has not been applied to CO2
Assertion. CAA has worked for other pollutants. Similar legislation or addition of CO2 to CAA as a regulated pollutant should work to reduce carbon emissions.
Explain how that is circular?
I said that Cap and Trade worked for sulfur (even though Rush Limbaugh speaking on behalf of The Heartland Institute and the GOP said that regulating sulfur was stupid between volcanos bla bla). Why wouldn't cap and trade also work to reduce carbon emissions?