Bmead
Member
And let me ask you is good science what YOU say it is?
Remember the "good science" of Nat Geo and the purpose built shaped charge of 175lb of thermite
You call Kevin Ryan out, whereabouts can i find you discrediting Nat Geo?
That was provable fraud on watching it but double proven when John Cole used 1.5LBS to slice into steel
That is where the lay person comes in, i wasn't a scientist but i know a few things and before ignition i knew there would be no damage to Nat Geos steel column.
Therefore it is necessary to be clear on what "good science" is because it seems to me, that good science here is, what proves your ideas, to me, i daresay fault could be found IF what you say about Ryan is true.
Therefore it HAS to be xxx no. of tests running over xxx questions answers are sought to, by BOTH groups and a joint selected independent
Then if truthers are wrong they have to suck it up and deal with it.
Remember the "good science" of Nat Geo and the purpose built shaped charge of 175lb of thermite
You call Kevin Ryan out, whereabouts can i find you discrediting Nat Geo?
That was provable fraud on watching it but double proven when John Cole used 1.5LBS to slice into steel
That is where the lay person comes in, i wasn't a scientist but i know a few things and before ignition i knew there would be no damage to Nat Geos steel column.
Therefore it is necessary to be clear on what "good science" is because it seems to me, that good science here is, what proves your ideas, to me, i daresay fault could be found IF what you say about Ryan is true.
Therefore it HAS to be xxx no. of tests running over xxx questions answers are sought to, by BOTH groups and a joint selected independent
Then if truthers are wrong they have to suck it up and deal with it.