Search results

Jeremey Corbell has since said it was fimed between 17 - 20 October 2017. Source: https://twitter.com/MikeColangelo/status/1747296791706419409?t=lwi8bh5Q6HkMK6Wfj794LA&s=19

I looked carefully and the balloons seemed to move up and down at the same time as the camera moves up and down, not due to turbulence.

"Flaky" :rolleyes:

<snip> I think your suggestion here - two things that could entirely have happened at random being selected as evidence that they were not random - is an argument from incredulity. The idea that if a balloon rises and reaches its neutral buoyancy point is a sign that whoever inflated it (and...

where and when did you post that?

to me the lower right "leg" looks like it hads something wrapped around it, I had thought it was tinsel when I suspected this might be a Christmas or New Year Balloon. does anyone else see that...?

Video on this page. Looks very like the iPhone autofocus lights. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/news/im-a-flight-attendant-and-have-seen-a-ufo-heres-my-picture-proof/ar-AA1n2QMK

By making claims about a video that is of such poor quality that it could literally be anything. It is not 'clearly' anything, but looks a bit like a flying saucer. Any debunk claim is hard to stick because it can be dismissed as not looking like what is seen in the blurry, pixelated, shaky...

Well I agree that a 'man on a jet pack' is a better place to start than a flying spaghetti monster - but here we have something that doesn't display the expected signature (heat) coming from the proposed jet pack engines. Instead of a something zipping around the sky at great speed and changing...

I think this is the full unedited second part of the Jellyfish video.

If so, why don't we see hot gasses coming out of the jets in the infra red image?

Hi great analysis. You've obviously put some time into that. Could you add a few lines to the post just summarising your method & conclusion for those who don't have time to read through the full pdf?

yes I see the balloons. I also see something wrapped around one of the "tentacles' - I think it might be tinsel. This animation is a good way to perceive the 3d structure... Source: https://x.com/Cortex_Zero/status/1745279856777076808?t=dYVrl80irvF27usvpVKAAg&s=09

More starlink flares Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOPilotReports/comments/19655vu/popular_pilot_on_social_media_has_started_posting/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/19633qs/popular_pilot_on_social_media_has_started_posting/ A...

A MX-20 recorded the Jellyfish. The Chandelier was a Raytheon MTS-B as shown above. We can tell by the text overlay.

The top left of the original video says "FLIR SYSYEMS" so definitely one of theirs.

I recently found this video (supposedly of a 'UAP" that looks like spider silk) that shows a lot of similarity with the Kumburgaz video and my CCTV theory. The grey hue, the curved shape, the points of light in the distance, the changing scene. That, along with the fact that the main witness was...

Just found this on Flickr...

I think the 9km is correct. There's a definite 'cut' in the video at 0m23s that brings it back to 6.9km, not sure if that is before or after the section Also I have noticed that the background is the same in the video at 0m0s and 0m14s Some landmarks are discernible from the video & google...

Wow that timelapse is pretty cool.