Search results

Would you mind giving me some clear evidence to support this claim? Because my search couldn't find anything that would do that, alas. These are the former Luna statements I found having more relevance for that matter...

What I can't understand is why (how come?) the ICGC ever present not sufficient evidence.

Good points. And important to remind them to us.

Well, and I'm for one that doesn't need to be a sceptic to note it about his claims ;).

I think the probability still stands about that secret program being precisely a recovery of foreign/adversary crafts (airplanes or whatever), given the informative points @Duke gave about the possible criminal acts connected to it: As for Grusch's kind of ramblings on the possible physics...

Well then speculation also says that Grusch has been either lying about the whole UFO stuff or has been duped around albeit his own first-hand witness allegations, right? Because the speculation I some times heard that he misunderstood their sources err, I found far-fetched for a man who has a...

It was the first link listed when I googled "FOIA from NRO which spoke of multiple systems detecting a tic-tac like object" :). Note that it's heavily redacted though.

I guess this is the link to that FOIA, it will download the NRO's document in PDF format: https://www.nro.gov/Portals/65/documents/foia/declass/ForAll/103122/F-2021-00154_C05136334.pdf

Exactly, and it's not news to those who follow Grusch's appearances on digital media outlets -- Newsnation is one of them but can't provide the links without an extensive search (sorry for not following the forums' guidelines here and understand this post may be deleted).

As we've hoped that the law will keep on working 100% for protection of the people, let us believe all those legal measures will be REALLY taken.

For which the congressmen will not dare to do anything about. Am I right?

These are all too recent news to me to form an opinion for that matter. I'd rather wait for likely further "unfoldings".

Sorry but I think your sentence got incomplete for some reason.

I'm subscribed to That UFO Podcast but only read the titles, this time though I think it may be interesting hearing what T. Burchett has to say, that video was already put on my "watch later" list. But might watch it ASAP, thanks for the heads-up!

Given the history of Corbell's "leaked" videos, not surprising to me at all if it's yet another water-muddling case. Just one more of his videos which lack enough data and/or information for a complete analysis.

Thank you for you wishes @John J., much appreciated. And sorry for refusing to go into further details about that statement, but as I said I find no sense whatsoever in continuing that discussion. And due to so much interesting stuff these days to spend our times on, I've realised I'm getting...

Just can't wrap my head around the idea of bringing up a tweet post by that [moderator edit for politeness] individual L Elizondo just to make an as much preposterous question to me... Amazing. Say what you want but this discussion has long ended up a waste of time at least to me, so sorry (BTW...

And to make it even more clear, for that matter I'm referring to some of the well-known, so-called wild speculations.

Indeed, a scientific hypothesis must be supported (or falsified) with observable evidence, otherwise it's merely scientific speculation. On the other hand, people here will continue to be wrong when assuming that any speculation about UFOs should always be dismissed as completely subjective...

Right on. But again, what surprised me was the presumption that just a weather balloon (rather than a spy balloon) would make such headlines on the mainstream media as well. Anyway, if I got it right anything that appears over LAX is per se something to be reported, right?