Search results

  1. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Well I wondered whether there should be some punitive action? Just saying, but at second thought yea it sounds like unnecessary waste of time indeed.
  2. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Christmas tree ornament? EDIT: I mean, they identified the fake but didn't go after its perpetrators?
  3. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Agreed. As I thought, there's no need of resourcing to photo manipulation in order to render a fake image.
  4. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Good points, but can't there also be fake without photo manipulation? A hypothetical example of what I'm wondering would be the possibility that the "UFO" turns out to be an object pulled up by a thread not made visible by the camera lens resolution.
  5. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Right on, absolutely, I'd best have deleted my sentence. As I've long followed John in the Black Vault and am a great admirer of his work and transparency I didn't think twice about spreading the word on his defence, but here's a completely wrong place for it at all! I sincerely apologise for that.
  6. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Sorry Duke, at first thought didn't realise that's long and fringe story indeed completely unknown to the general public, alas. Never mind about that, but If it's actually of interest to you, let me know via PM.
  7. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    I think, shouldn't we pray for that? But I agree with someone who on a previous post made a good point that he isn't (hopefully!) a man like Luiz Elizondo, even though on this case he's in some way acting a bit like, say a "British hero". Anyway, on the Calvine event he's already done a whole...
  8. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Hey that may indeed turn out to be a big deal some day!
  9. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Interesting, I would expect then there wasn't reported accounts of that UFO hovering for a long time/shooting up into the sky at high speed... unless I'm definitely not aware these features were already a reality achieved by advanced technologies from those black budget programs back then?
  10. R

    Calvine: Disclosure Team Q&A

    ...unless it is tethered to some secluded strategic place, at equilibrium altitude thanks to cutting edge static forces keeping it hovering for long periods depending upon the wind conditions? Out of curiosity, is there today (or has there ever been) a blimp, kite, balloon or any other inflated...
  11. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Yea right on, I had all that in mind when wondering whether the UFO's actual movements were all distorted, exaggerated in some way or even completely made up.
  12. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Interesting point, which leads me to think its two alleged "air maneuvers" (hovering for 10 mins. and shooting up in the sky at a high velocity) were definitely made up for some reason.
  13. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Like the B2 Stealth Bomber, IIRC. In the early 90's there were reported accounts confusing it with a UFO in the highlands.
  14. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    It actually makes sense if the Brits indeed had the most advanced radar technology around that time. And, as it turned out, having chosen that supposedly highly populated Scottish territory for their test of that secret aircraft didn't really caused public curiosity or furor around the world...
  15. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Assuming it's true fact Clarke's account that one of the jet fighters circled around the UFO, these recreations from the photographer makes me wonder whether it was rather the second airplane that "circled" around the UFO. Weird behavior, BTW, as one would then also assume that its supposed...
  16. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Come to think about it again, I think you're indeed right. My fault then for not having realised it, he once even admitted not having the full awareness of the details. English is not my mother language anyway, sorry.
  17. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Well, as far as what I could gather from Nick Cook's observations, I guess he also implied what I highlighted in bold. And I'm not sure his thoughts on it might fit as one more of those bait and switch stories you referred to. Who knows anyway, I may well be wrong.
  18. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Yea, let us see what comes next, I reckon only time will tell.
  19. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    Disinformation, The Calvine UFO & The Aurora Project At the min. 8:51 of that interview, Nick Cook, as a guest on Jay Anderson's YT channel Project Unity, has just stated that the photocopy of the original Clavine UFO photo was touted as having been blown up into a poster and shoved on the wall...
  20. R

    Claim: Original Calvine UFO Photo

    As ZW Wolf pointed out, this film was used by art photographers. So whatever is the expert's analysis done it can't rule out a possible artsy effect allowed by the presence of a pond or a mirror. I think this case is closed now.
Back
Top