Search results

Have you ever seen a Cinemascope aspect ratio in a portrait orientation from a professional crew? Because that's what this would have to be (or a crop).

We've been discussing this since @Calter posted it above (#53).

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1184110/pg16#pid22633881 the facebook poster • gets the month wrong (!!) • does not know that basically everyone identified the helicopter as LASD • failed to find the debunk for this very public case don't trust everything you see on the Internet!

The LASD aero bureau later confirmed what it was investigating. The spherical object turned out to be an advertising helium balloon for vape company Brass Knuckles. Scott Brando, who runs hoax busting website ufoofinterest.org, tweeted: "Object identified. As I said that #UFO filmed from...

good catch! Published: September 6, 2017 On August 28th, 2017 there were multiple reports and videos of a strange sphere hovering over Los Angeles. This UFO sighting is actually really easy to explain, as it's nothing more than a balloon that was an advertisement for a company called “Brass...

unmarked helicopter—every helicopter has a registration or serial number painted, but it obviously does not stand out at this distance.

I can only see a very small version. stabilized—no, it's not 4K upscale=algorithm invented detail not present in the original fixed in positive lift=fixed September 2017—no accurate date or place=not interested in figuring out what it is. The elapsed time would make it hard to debunk anyway...

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1dqts7o/ufo_sighting_reported_at_red_rocks_in_colorado/ Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1dra4wk/12_witnesses_spot_ufo_soaring_above_red_rocks/ (quotes in the OP) report allegedly filed by https://www.reddit.com/user/Lemonator8976/...

... by shadow biologics?

falsifiable, though! (by those who hold the data)

The image is used variously to advertise Jaws: https://www.amazon.de/Jaws-Blu-ray-US-Import/dp/B007STBUIW https://meetfactory.cz/en/program/detail/letni-kino-xviii Imdb doesn't have it, but it has one where the sea and the boats in the background look similar. It's undisputably not recent.

Yeah, that's not true. Take for example the "racetrack"UFO sightings that turned out to be Starlink. The descriptions are correct except for the part where the observed motion is interpreted incorrectly. The "floating jellyfish" was based on an actual video, as was GIMBAL, but people were unable...

That's why provenance and provenience matter! If you don't know where something came from, it's not evidence for anything but itself. (i.e. "this picture exists", not "the spaceship in this picture exists". AI art drives this point home more succinctly than Photoshop has done.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-57D The United Planets Cruiser C-57D is a fictional starship featured in MGM's 1956 science fiction film Forbidden Planet. The design used for the starship is a flying saucer, inspired by the spate of UFO sightings during the 1950s Kits of this thing abound.

if they couldn't, the system would be very vulnerable to radar jamming

...and that is unreliable, too, because the description doesn't match, the distance doesn't match at all, and he might well have seen something we simply don't know about. Mind you, I'm not saying it's impossible. But it doesn't feel likely to me at this point, either.

I think your theory would make great fiction, but it rests on very unreliable evidence that you have to cherry-pick to make everything work, making it feel contrived.

Note that even the statement that Greenwald reproduced is advertising their symposium and his film. And that he's "embarrassed and ashamed" not at his misrepresenting the photograph, but at the people calling him out for it (and the profiteering). If you were an extraterrestrial, would you want...

I wonder if Ron James would call this "nasty" if the shoe was on the other foot? When I first saw his remark, I thought, "he's left the high road here, lashing out like that". But the remark actually does betray a messianic view of aliens, and the idea that everyone must abide by the divine law...

I thought it's documented that the newspaper contacted the MoD, and they told the paper it's bogus, since they had no such aircraft flying there at the time? That would mean the story lacked corroboration, and thus a quality paper wouldn't print it.