Search results

if GOFAST hadn't been claimed to be that (and isn't), I'd be more excited. Right now I'm thinking, "it's probably another badly supported claim that turns out to be bunk". Heck, that "evidence" could even be GOFAST. Or the GIMBAL "j-hook" bunk.

I have never known a storm to have an effect a week earlier and 1000 miles (1500 km) east. Storms have an effect where and when they are, and geographically Scotland is not a Baltic region.

Like, it might still turn out there was a saboteur aboard the ship, or someone paid the captain enough to do it. But then we wouldn't know who's behind it. The insurance company is going to want to know how the accident happened, so there's likely going to be an investigation anyway. But these...

please use quotes (mark text and use the "reply" pop, or use the reply button), it's unclear what you are referring to there are pictures with the skull facing down, and pictures with the skull facing up that's demonstrably false, the lopez paper shows two dozen details they proved it's a...

Don't think China intentionally does this. but it bears investigating. In June 2023, Baltic Fulmar was sold to the Chinese shipowner Hainan Xin Xin Yang Shipping, reflagged to Hong Kong, and renamed Newnew Polar Bear.[2] As of 9 October 2023 Newnew Polar Bear sails under NewNew Shipping...

yeah but the damage happened before; also Scotland isn't anywhere near the Baltic

I have a feeling @Jedlik is ignoring me.

Llama (green) faces left, Josefina (yellow) faces right. The skull/braincase is round on one side (yellow), flat on the other side (green), and has an opening at the base (red). These features make its orientation easy to identify in all of the pictures of the report, including the pictures...

Where does it show that, exactly? Please explain how this figure shows the skull facing the right way: It is irrelevant for the conclusion which way the skull is facing, because the fact that it's a llama braincase proves it's not a "real" mummy, but was assembled.

There are about two dozen similarities indicated with arrows in the figures of the Lopez paper that match the backwards llama braincase with the mummy skull. It really shows that you refuse to do source work, because you proclaim obvious falsehoods confidently, demolishing your reputation.

It says nothing about the honesty of the next guy. But it suggests that it should require more than to think "he's honest" to trust in his testimony—because we won't be certain to spot it if he's not.

The x-ray shows the leg bones to be a haphazard assembly of mismatching parts. ;)

The UFO community has had some spectacular failures assessing the honesty of people putting UFO claims forward. Bob Lazar comes to mind.

The paper claims that the mummy's skull resembles a backward oriented llama braincase. That's the whole point of the paper. Llama faces left, mummy faces right: Llama faces left, mummy faces right: I don't follow. Please quote the paper to support this point.

No. The brain that fits the mummy's skull is analysed, and regions are determined. The brain regions that have to do with eyesight are not where the mummy's eyes are, they are on the opposite side. These brain regions are near the llama's eyes. It's further proof that the skull is backwards.

https://www.iaras.org/iaras/filedownloads/ijbb/2021/021-0007(2021).pdf The Llama skull faces left, the mummy skull faces right. You're wrong.

Some scientific equipment (e.g. a large hadron collider) is rarely duplicated. Anthropologists working with a specific tribe wouldn't expect a different team to come in and replicate their observations. The important part is the clear separation between facts/observations and interpretation. (I...

The point is that Ashton's opinion is not affected by his clearance in any way. If it was, this would be him violating it (from the tweet quoted above): Spy Satellite USA-229 which has a sister satellite next to it classified as debris. This allows for the proven 3D stereoscopic imagery (But as...

Does this mean the lower row of teeth is set in the skull?

At which point it becomes indistinguishable from a rocket that came from the other direction in the first place, creating the impression that it came from Israel. What does the impact crater and crater-adjacent ground marks tell us about the direction the missile/rocket fragment came from when...