Search results

Apparently there's a middleman?

Obviously this is a spacecraft in an XLEO¹, and as such it must've been tracked by ground stations. (At least that what I'm lead to believe after perusing the first page of search results on "ground tracking data".) I wonder how he's going to perform triangulation from one observation, or maybe...

That's false, his name is Fernando Cornejo-Würfl. Google screenshot: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/fee.2489 :

He's demonstrating the Eötvös effect, which is the Coriolis effect with only the vertical part considered. He does not consider horizontal deviation (which is typically less than wind effects, I expect). West target was hit low: East target was hit high:

You originally wrote, "you will indeed see the bullet swing left, then right". This describes e.g. the behaviour of some balls in the video I posted, due to friction. My issue with this statement is that the bullet will "go left" because you aimed left, i.e. it actually goes straight as...

angular velocity, not angular momentum angular momentum increases with the radius, coriolis force decreases

a ballistic missile launched straight north from the equator to hit the pole will be seen to deviate to the right, miss the pole altogether, and cross the equator again the bullet will not "swing left", it'll fly left initially because you aimed in that direction, and then deviate ("swing") to...

NHI

This isn't nitpicking. You're saying there is no net deflection at the pole, which is wrong. The horizontal deflection is strongest there, while it is zero at the equator. If you argue this with a FEer who knows physics (there are some), they'll crucify you over this, probably using the toilet...

One wonders if there's any overlap between ufo believers and moon landing deniers.

Please explain why the shell veers left. Please explain why the shell swings back. What happens when you double the distance?

Yep. Please review https://www.metabunk.org/threads/ross-coulthart.13159/post-302734 to find your claim that Greenstreet is a "QAnon backer" disproven by evidence, showing that you "espoused opinion as fact too fast" (your own words). This is part of my rebuttal of your larger claim, that "both...

There's general agreement on this; I hope my first reply above makes this clear. This, however, is not true. Unless your firing distance is zero, either the gun or the target are moving, even at the poles, and that will throw the aim off. Thd only exception is when the gun and the target are...

I'm almost ready to bet that when (if?) the other two pictures get released, we're going to be able to identify the butterfly on them. They don't show any "orb", why not let us have those original files?

We should demand full disclosure! Maybe we can get Graves on it?

Could someone ask Würfl what agency these pictures are registered with? Then we/Mick could simply obtain them there.

If the search isn't fruitful, feel free to present the bunk claim here on Metabunk. --- Something that might work is to ask for evidence. — "Russell Brand claims this-and-that." — "How does he know? What evidence does he have?" I trust "the government" (e.g. CDC, WHO) when they're transparent...

It's as if they don't want us to research what they're telling us. Hmmmmmm.

I try to provide timestamps even when quoting from a transcript so that people can more easily watch the quote in context, if they so desire.

888×1600 for the watermarked picture 721×1600 for the phone screenshot