Search results

Welcome! You can now watch topics (and forums) and get notifications for that, and set bookmarks. If you wish to react to posts, you need to post two more messages.

Where do you see that? The taxonomy analyses had a large percentage "unidentified reads".

The Grey alien has emerged as an archetypal image of an intelligent non-human creature and extraterrestrial life in general, as well as an iconic trope of popular culture in the age of space exploration. More there.

This is a very bright outdoor scene that should have had a short exposure. Would the EXIF data have that info? It's obvious that there's going to be some motion blur at some amount of speed, but IMO conditions were such that this speed would be quite high.

This is the biggest fraction of the analysis. I'll readily admit I have no experience reading this, but it looks like it's mainly beans, contaminated with everything else. The mummy might be modeled from bean paste? If it was a real mummy, I'd hope this is the analysis of the stomach contents.

Attack of the killer beans? Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phaseolus_vulgaris

Objects that nobody saw at the time, but were found on photos later, are often • something small and close to the camera that looks bigger in the picture, or • something mundane that looks weird because of the flatness and low resolution. I see you're already thinking in those directions...

I get the impression Coulthart is good at presenting the human angle of a story. If I was his boss, I'd pair him up with someone who provides the rigor.

My tablet would record "phantom presses" when I had it hooked up to a charger that was too strong. Some kind of electromagnetic interference with the touchscreen, I suppose. Welcome to Metabunk!

Ariel School threads: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/the-ariel-school-zimbabwe-ufo-sighting-has-it-ever-been-debunked.5389/ https://www.metabunk.org/threads/ariel-school-ufo-glinting-reflections-through-vegetation-how-to-visualise.12528/

...., yet, like satellites, ... How can he tell when the camera is shaking so much? The aggravating thing is that there's no abbreviation for "strange moving lights in the sky", which this should've been reported as. The DoD tried to make "unidentified aerial phenomenon" happen, but the UFO...

—"Person A lied to us, but he's on our side, so we forgive him. Everybody knows that the other side lies, too." —"How do you know the other side lies?" —"Person A told us."

IAEA report on uranium deposits worldwide (includes depleted deposits): Each deposit is 300 km away, on the other side of the capital. Where do these claims originate? They're easily disproven with little effort, can none of the "believers" and "journalists" be bothered? How about analysts...

And it wouldn't have melted down if the backup generators hadn't been flooded. As a third point on your map, consider the location of the epicenter of the earthquake: Any possible connection can only be magical.

The contrail is a bit of a giveaway tbh

a) Coulthart has an American audience now. b) If this was an international conspiracy, then the Australians must be in on it. If the Australians are in on it, why send Americans and not Australians to talk to the girls? The premises here are • government is evil • evil is dumb which is gleaned...

I think we see the reflection of the camera lens in the window, so out of focus that we can only almost read the writing on the lens. This implies a) there's not a lot of space between the lens and the window for air or objects to move in, and b) whatever is in that space should be very blurry...

“If Mick were really interested in this stuff, he wouldn’t debunk every single video” "How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously", April 30, 2021 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously

How do I use manual focus when taking video with the built-in android camera app?