Search results

With the focal length of the camera anything close to the camera would be so out of focus as to not be visible.

Parallax can come from following/tracking a moving object from a static viewpoint as well.

Can we work out with shadow length, we'd need time of day/and both maybe we can work it out from another fixed shadow

Man I was just getting there as well :)

Yeah the platform is most likely to be an fixed wing aircraft or a helicopter but could be a drone.

That doesn't mean it couldn't have been seen by any other system or human eyeballs etc.

I think everything here is hyperfocal for the camera, the object and the background are in focus. Anything close to the camera would be a blur

I think at around frame 1188 a (US?) Flag can been seen fluttering slightly for a few frames in the top right, perhaps some indication of wind direction?

Yeah I'm now convinced it's not a mark/smear, we saw the black drone balloon did not rotate when it was calm either.

The 1st object, to me it looks just like some smear/mark on protective glass or otherwise just in front of the camera, there's seemingly no internal movement or perspective shape change of the structure it's just there it change apparent shade as the FLIR adjusts for the background. I'd like to...

The counterclaim will be what the pilots saw is "different" despite all the videos looking exactly like Starlink.

correction altitude delta was 1450ft

My thought are currently The thing with "classic" is in the the room. The thing with "classic" is illuminated on the edge by the light and also partially obscures the light. Thus the light is in the room.

Yeah it's the reflection of a TV or computer monitor partially obscured by something with 'classic' or similar written on it.

So just after take off from Frederick Municipal Airport that aircraft would have been North West of Frederick at about 10 miles and at 4000ft. It would have been over flown at a small delta of 1550ft by an unusual looking aircraft, a dark grey Cirrus Vision Jet WSP29/N29VJ. The jet would have...

The earlier something gets debunked the better, the longer people are out there making all sorts of 100% real because of x,y and z the more legs it has as it's harder to back down. With this it took long enough for the stone cold asset matches to emerge that enough people latched on, then...

Found this image collection showing a few orientations Source: https://imgur.com/a/dSgN00q

The drone video is oversubscribed so undownloadable at the moment. Maybe someone will rehost.

I thought balloon with stabilisation and parallax when 1st saw it, the balloon movements seems to coincide with drone/camera movements

A common reaction to this evidence is that what if the image was reverse created from the video then the raw file faked in order to discredit the evidence, as insane as this sounds this is the level of some UFO fans. Can we show this to be even less likely than it already sounds? The...