Search results

It could be meteor combined with camera shake, a brief bright light at the same time the camera moves.

Just looks like more hot pixels to me

Hot pixels are common in long exposures

They tend to be warmer/different colours and are fairly dull so I don't think they would create an effect like this over the given exposure time.

Someone with a head torch or similar could illuminate a bug.

You enhanced the image so you are already out of the raw data only stage.

41.83085165062829, -73.42666759265575

The dark band could be an effect of the image processing, RGB colours is also possibly a bit of chromatic aberration.

This is my thought a head torch or something used at the start or end of the exposure caught an insect in flight, or a mote of dust with camera movement.

It can costs thousands of points to have medical investigations that either don't turn up things but or prevent more expensive treatments later, speculative/preventative spending is a thing. My understanding is that planes and pilots fly on regular training missions and that at least some of...

The problem with the word diminutive is it's relative. Drones can and are much bigger than that commercial quadcopter. But still smaller than say another fighter jet for example. We know nothing about it other than what you;ve seen and read, but usually jet FLIR video is corrected to match what...

Seems again like a classification/confidence of identification debate, I don't think we know enough about how things are characterised/identified/assessed as drone etc or UAP. The real question is what does it take for this classification to be be present or not. • For the past 15 years in...

It's the @ sign in some other font and its his X/Twitter/Insta/Facebook handle I imagine

A good clean picture or pictures or video with metadata from a reliable source such as a government would a be a big deal yes. Providence and provenance matters, This is a partial crop of a still from a highly compressed and likely recompressed video from a military FLIR system, characterised...

This is apparent with the strategic public release of footage from military aircraft such as the drone footage of the buzz by a Russian fighter jet and the Chinese interception of the US Air Force B52.

Except this is already happening with Mars missions, SETI, Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer, Exoplanet analysis etc.

That Tesla camera CGI fake where they did it on 2 cameras, faked the metadata etc would basically have been unsolvable apart from they admitted it and described the process.

A few years ago the US government/military had "confirmed UAP were real" (statements relating to the authenticity of the 3 US Navy videos) now that same organisation/s is covering up the thing they apparently confirmed.

They think he and AARO are a public front of the cover up of the US government knowing about and having alien spaceships and bodies

One of the features of fringe beliefs is the uncritical acceptance of other related fringe beliefs and the glossing over of mutually exclusive distinctions in specifics.