Search results

A microlight

When using the ATFLIR we've seen that pilots often try to maintain a bank to allow optimal use of the pod depending on where the target object is relative to the aircraft. However GIMBAL is the result of tracking an object whilst bringing the aircraft around to put that object in front of you...

Can you provide a google maps link to this location?

Why do you not care about them?

They are most likely surprised and elated because it's a small object and they did a hard to do thing, in manually slewing the camera and dragging the autotrack box and having it grab it on a small distant object at max digital zoom, you can see the WSO slew the camera (with a thumb joystick.)...

As much as I am loathe to grant ad hits to the Daily Mail I have been asked read this Daily Mail article now a few times https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12523999/NASA-UFO-panel-wind-data-GOFAST-GIMBAL-UAP-skeptics-simulation-weather-data.html I am trying to pick my way through...

Can anyone who has been following it break down the NASA analysis and subsequent UFO twitter noise? All I can get is NASA did an analysis but didn't take into account turn rate or wind or something and got the low end speed based on the simple trigonometry model as detailed at the start of this...

So just to be crystal clear, the person answering those questions was Grusch and the answers are only redacted to protect him and he could, if he wanted, reveal those answers?

ADSB confirmation

As far as I know monotremes lay eggs and lactate, but they don't have nipples. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotreme

We need original files with EXIF to go any further and probably even then we won't work out what it is, just establish some range of parameters.

I might be completely wrong but surely it's not one cell's DNA strand being sequenced, by the looks of that result the contents of the sample analysed was mostly a specific bean plant and a "soup" of many different species like you might find on a contaminated sample, with some human line cells...

Amazing stuff

The full frame equivalent focal length (a stand in for field of view) is also listed as 26mm, a fairly typical phone focal length. Human vision can't be easily compared given we have differently accuity in the various extremities and obviously our eyes saccade to cover a perceptually larger...

I missed that, yeah so 1/7463 of second so very fast.

H.G. Wells is easily one of the most influential authors of science fiction of all time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells#Literary_influence_and_legacy The science fiction historian John Clute describes Wells as "the most important writer the genre has yet seen", and notes his work...

Yes, the shutter here will likely be very high given the brightness. But the EXIF will tell us for sure. Burst mode has nothing to do with how blurred an object will be in any specific frame, unless that algorithm make the shutter faster as well (at the expense of ISO.)

It's always interesting to find out where the various UFO proponents draw the line.

When you say the actual kite, do you mean the same actual one, or just the same make/model but a different actual kite?

Sounds like an excellent question for those making extraordinary claims about these things.