Search results

Only he knows what he was told, use terms that mean something to people to describe those things. How can I know what terms he should use? He is the one with the information.

I can't get anything usable as a reference point out of it, fi we had stars as a reference then we could map to the TLEs of satellites at that time. But without reference points it's hard. I even tried extracting and stacking from each frame of the video.

Attach or upload the actual raw file to somewhere like dropbox so we can have a proper look.

Sure non-human biological specimen would be a good start, although it still leaves it open to meaning an animal or something. But it's better than Biologic which has a totally different meaning from pharmacology. That's the point we don't really know because he is using words that are a bit...

No I do not. Which is precisely WHY the terms need to be clear and unambiguous.

The time to be very clear and explicit and double check word usage is when you are relaying potentially the most important thing to occur in all of human history to Congress. Also Ross Coulthard should be checking and clarifying any jargon usage to ensure the story he is relaying is unambiguous...

Okay I get it the video without a numbered suffix is the original version. The others are edited because that video is so under exposed.

The wide aspect (1st link) and the 3rd link files have a date of 30/06/2023 so were they recorded later? Or modified?

The Clarkism (word used by sci-fi author Arthur C Clarke) for biological robot is Biot, used in Rendezvous with Rama to describe biological robots, the term robot itself originated from sci-fi From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot The term comes from a Slavic root, robot-, with...

The word "biologic" used as a noun does not even mean what it is implied to mean by Grusch, alien or not. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/biologic

Essentially in order to demonstrate it we'd need a FLIR camera capable of as narrow an FOV as ATFLIR and then we'd have to take it to a military test range where we'd have a clear LOS of jets up to 30NM away, ideally as high elevation as possible, without getting arrested by by the FBI :)...

Stereoscopic imaging is used with reconnaissance photography because the perception of depth was found to aid intelligence gathering. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_reconnaissance Frederick Charles Victor Laws started experiments in aerial photography in 1912 with No. 1 Squadron RAF...

Pretty sure we already have this: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/balloon-shapes.12857/

Is that calculated on the non stretched/squished version?

Potential interview candidate? I'd love to hear about why certain words were chosen in the report like 'mothership' editorialised?

Sunlight is pure white before the blue part of it is scattered by Rayleigh effect which makes the sun look yellow/orange/red etc when viewed from the ground though atmosphere.

I feel a wide angle from the ground sky shot with more resolution is always going to have more sky shade variation in it than a smaller crop from a low res video taken top down.

The utter irony here is that by ignoring the Starlink explanation they are directly making things less safe. If we acknowledge they are Starlink, note the conditions they appear in and inform pilots what to look out for. Then when they see them they can actively be ignored and the pilots can...

Some guy made a comfortingly British accented video about the whole thing here Source: https://youtu.be/_VmrRGln1XA

The Starlink flares UFOs have been described in simple terms a while ago in a few different threads and several of Micks videos. This thread is an specfic investigation thread into Ryan Graves video to see if it is Starlink, at the end of it the conclusion is, yes it very probably is Starlink...