Search results

What I find odd is the cursor/numbers/screen drag updates on each frame and the plane/orbs on every 4th frame, which makes me think that the main video was made independently then it was screen captured.

So the Triclops Grey Eagle is 2 Raytheon sensor pods mounted on the weapon pylons, a bit like ATFLIR takes up a pylon slot on the F/A-18 So this means 3 sensors rather than one hence triclops, in that article it seems to imply that the 2 wing sensors are operated independently from the main UAV...

The Mirror in the UK is now reporting this story. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/flying-orbs-filmed-spinning-around-30695336.amp Since Elizondo and Grusch the UFO bubble has expanded.

I agree this whole thing is in poor taste, I feel bad participating in the debunk. I think if the person that created this CGI is out there, at this point they should come forward with any evidence to show they created it to save the families of the victims of this tragedy more trauma as it...

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15p6aps/simulating_the_mq1_camera_pose/ Someone said they tried it but there attempt looks flawed to me, incorrect drone model (as per the claims) and they never show a good external view of where they positioned the camera.

I agree that is really, really unlikely a spy satellite has a colour video camera But That's how most colour cameras works, a "mono" sensor with a bayer filter in front of them https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter

Someone could have had a fun UFO abducts plane CGI video ready to go in the portfolio and then just added coordinates and a real satellite that matched later on in an overlay. If that is a pod mounted camera on the wing of a drone as pictured the angle it looks a little odd to have a wing and...

So would this depth mapping have to be able to make a depth map for each pixel for each object in the scene? Plane/clouds/contrail of the plane/alien orbs etc?

Like what?

If the stereo image comes from depth data mapping, why is the cursor also offset by the same ammount?

The video from that satelite is not IR though it's visible light.

There's GeoGuessr https://www.metabunk.org/threads/the-geoguessr-community-as-a-geolocation-tool.12655/ https://www.geoguessr.com/

When analysing frame by frame note that the plane/orb/flash only update every 4th frame, so that video is at 6FPS whereas the other elements (numbers/cursor/screen drag) update on each frame.

I think the mouse slide thing is a little weird by not a smoking gun, the mouse cursor and dragging updates happen every frame, but the plane / orb movements only happen every 4 frames, which means that if they were both key framed it was on different keyframing.

Metabunk is behind the scenes look at investigative analysis, you are seeing the mistakes and the work and dead avenues in real time. When people come here with pure statements I would not say they get uncritically believed like you suggest whether they support or not.

What's annoying is that guy just ghosted without so much as a thanks when his sighting was explained. Maybe the second astrophotographer this month to use UFOs to get some eyes on their work.

The weird thing to me is the single frame version looks stretched from reality and the stereo version looks squashed, so neither version looks right. The overlay looks better on the single frame vid but if you look at the plane and the orbs they look stretched.

So the given the horizontal compression then the stereo video was created later as an intentional hoax by both cropping and compressing horizontally the full frame video (which has a more realistic aspect ratio for the text and cursor and more text visible) posted earlier and then creating a...

Could be prototype or a sampler.

See this is what bothers me a little about Coultart. This is basic journalism/research right? You receive an image of a patch from a source, allegedly this patch is related to alien reverse engineering, it has some words on it, surely you look into the patch and the words, you'd trivially find...