Search results

Is there any political will/gain in the US system to be made from putting effort in to adopting a sceptical approach to this?

Even if the estimate is near they had no basis to make it as they had no idea how far away they were looking. It would just be a coincidence. I tried to find estimates online for the apparent length of the starlink trains during deployment but a brief search didn't reveal anything. I found a...

Biologics is a word, but it refers to basically to bio-dervied pharmaceuticals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biopharmaceutical A biopharmaceutical, also known as a biological medical product,[1] or biologic, is any pharmaceutical drug product manufactured in, extracted from, or...

The Tic Tac "event" as told Starts with Kevin Day's anecdotal recollection of weird RADAR returns on the USS Princeton's RADAR. Middles with Kuth and then Fravor and Dietrich's respective anecdotes of their whitewater/Tic Tac encounter after being vectored by Day. Ends with Underwoods Tic Tac...

In the original agenda item it was and still is described as "We" and both speakers are listed as SCU, Griffiths as a "member SCU" Screenshot from reddit thread Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/13du6gl/a_very_large_uap_crosses_the_north_pacific/ However if you visit the link...

So Travis Taylor et al then.

I'm not saying it is the same paper just that I am wary of a paper that seems to be along the same lines.

"Capabilities of the peformance" Sounds a little like that SCU paper. We consider a handful of well-documented encounters, including the 2004 encounters with the Nimitz Carrier Group off the coast of California, and estimate lower bounds on the accelerations exhibited by the craft during...

Yeah it's a bit of problem But I mean apart from Mick Metabunk is largely anonymous and none of us are really putting any personal/professional reputation the on the line. With the recent videos people who have a lot of status are linked to the claims, that is probably off-putting to people...

I am not sure if that was specifically presented to NASA but the FOIA that Greenwald did for NASA's UAP stuff revealed that the SCU were introduced to NASA and a presentation was discussed as well as several well known cases.

The SCU world be given more slack if they addressed the egregious errors they made with Aguadilla and were also not being given the privileged position of presenting this this flawed analysis to NASA etc.

If the Aguadilla case is anything to go by it's the latter.

Not to mention load out, wind speed etc

I mean they and us are largely irrelevant now it's straight "You totally have alien bodies and spaceships" "no we don't" fight between Burchett, Luna and Grusch etc and Kirkpatrick/US DOD. The videos are irrelevant basically right?

I guess there's no TLEs that cover immediate post launch Starlink train positions?

I managed to get an Astrometry match by adjusting the image a little to make the apparent stars stick out a bit more, and removing the train https://nova.astrometry.net/user_images/8325204#original

What form would you suggest the analysis takes?

Same gaps mostly.

J hook is almost a certainly reference to the "proposed" path of a 10 mile Gimbal object, which if people recall was only ever a 'thing' AFTER the work of this forum (Edward Current/Mick etc) to determine the range of possible flight paths. No-one from AATIP/Graves etc ever really mentioned it...

Remember that's the TV view, a common mistake with FLIR1 is assuming it's all IR when it actually switches during the video, keep an eye on the text middle top to see whether you are seeing visible light or IR at any specific frame and remember there's a few frames lag on updating some values on...