Search results

The video (FLIR1, ironically which is the only Navy video that has sections not in IR mode) is so low res and affected by artifacts that you can take many frames and see different things. AFAIK these claims of projections that match what Fravor said he saw are based some cherry picked frame...

You want to see a non human occupant of a spacecraft?

is it subject to FOIA?

It's as simple as Grusch, in secret with protection hands over his list, Kirkpatrick talks to them then answers the question.

Yes I have clarified my typo.

Was on the Princeton's RADAR but not Fravors RADAR

Yeah sorry, I'll edit my post

Kevin Day claims the object was on RADAR, vectored Fravor there but there's no mention of correlation between and object on both the ship RADAR and Fravor planes RADAR when the encountered the tictac as far as I know.

Kirkpatrick has already made statements that whilst not specifically in direct reply to Grusch, directly contradict the claims of Grusch, yet here you are.

No it's a statement of objective fact. Perhaps you can answer my question relating to how a lack of evidence can be demonstrated to you?

Nice work summing up this whole thing.

Confident enough in the event? What does this mean?

Snowden and Manning had thousands of NSA and military documents they released, that is evidence. What if the UFO evidence just doesn't exist? How are you going to be satisfied that it doesn't? Rather than just assuming it's being covered up in perpetuity. Can this negative ever be proven to...

Fairly odd that for ages Graves has been going on about squares in spheres and paraphrasing what he remembers of the SA screen from Gimbal but just forgot to mention the red football field sized UFO that appeared over a major US airbase until today.

Pretty sure there's a while thread on it here can't dig it up at the moment though

Yes we have Dietrichs account which has some variations from Fravors

Cite this forum saying that

By us on this forum? Like you were talking about in the 1st instance?

Let's pretend that I pretend to be be upset that you put so little thought into understanding the career of this 30 years of experience Navy pilot by "getting his branch of service completely incorrect in a flippant manner", would you think I was overreacting? re my unsual medical diagnosis...

By "instant kneejerk dismissal" I presume you are referring to the dozens of multiple hundred post threads debating the evidence presented?