Search results

It's not that we can't it's just that often we are not trying to do so. Because sometimes we are just trying to work it out, trust me the scientists at Feynman's intstitutions were not talking to each other behind the scenes at '8 year old' level, you just never get you see that part. This...

My feeling is we're not all here to make every post and thread an accessible friendly explanation, Mick spends hours on his YouTube videos and those are often the culmination of all the high level tech chats that are had here "the factory floor" or "behind the scenes" if you will. If people ask...

Hypersonic stuff has to travel high, this could just be a normal air to ground or air to air missile or similar standard ordnance. Actually given the arc on the trail could be ground launched.

I believe headlines tending to be written by editors is the oft given excuse by journalists.

The agnostic approach you have to take to avoid being labelled close minded allows for clickbait and misrepresentation.

Facts in the article are wrong, headline is misleading. Science Journalism is in a bad state.

It was available to view but not download I assumed it was a mistake. I am not sure how johne1618 obtain the version he posted.

Yeah I was going to mention your simulation really doesn't have any path that fits a rocket.

illegally?

UAP is going the same way from what I can tell.

There's a cut at 41 is this a re-edit, where's original file with metadata? Otherwise it could just be a large balloon with some other smaller balloons floating along.

This needs sorting before analysis

The words "genuine UFO" are a kind of shibboleth When someone sceptical calls you on it of course just means something we couldn't identify that is flying. To your target audience it means alien spaceship.

The SA shows tracks from the onboard radar and also donated tracks if configured that way, if the SRB's were radar returns that were being picked up by them or another RADAR donating then they would show up on the SA. I think the proposed Atlas theory is the Gimbal object is the main stage...

If you want ATLFIR to point at a track you have on the computer (RADAR/donated etc) you can either designate that track as your L+S then SLAVE to that If you want to point ATFLIR at a different target you can use SLAVE to point at the designated track that is not your L+S. These are the 2...

If that's what was happening then L+S or SLAVE would be boxed on the ATFLIR DDI overlay, this is how you point ATFLIR at a RADAR/donated track. Autotrack is specifically tracking an object using contrast detection, the 2 are often used in combination where a SLAVE is done to point the pod at a...

Claim by Alpha Check on Twitter Source...

But the ATFLIR shows a negative 2 degree angle.

The major problem with that Graves description are it indicates ATFLIR in SLAVE but video shows its not in SLAVE. There are 2 screens in the F18 what was on the other one at this time? I assume the SA? As they talk about it. So which is this radar screen they switched from to show ATFLIR? Ryan...

The major problem with that Graves description are it indicates ATFLIR in SLAVE but video shows its not in SLAVE. There are 2 screens in the F18 what was on the other one at this time? I assume the SA? As they talk about it. So which is this radar screen they switched from to show ATFLIR?