Search results

I was wondering if it is possible that the ATFLIR tracking/rotation algorithm works differently when in pure auto track mode versus being in SLAVE mode with a RADAR track assisting, maybe it has to make allowances in how it adjusts based on being in a either auto only, auto with RADAR as well...

Part of the problem with these videos is uncropped, extended plain reference footage from ATFLIRs and other pods in operation for comparison is very, very limited. These 3 videos are some of the best public footage there is of ATFLIR in operation and especially in A/A mode as most other cockpit...

Works fine for me, do you have any scripting turned off or plugins that disable scripts.

It seems there was a debate maybe before the video starts as it opens with "it is a fucking drone bro" so one of the operators seems to think so.

As I understand it this isn't a simulation of the pod's algorithms, it's simulation that allows you to plug in the values you get from a video and see the relevant rotations from all angles. I.e. you can't ask it to track any scenario like an ATFLIR would, you have to put in all the values and...

The drone is essentially an unpiloted jet airplane.

There is apparently some new unclassified about the drone swarm thing on 2019 https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/44231/navy-releases-timeline-for-2019-uas-swarm-involving-warships-off-california Any evidence here pointing to it being an test/exercise? Apologies for the link drop I have...

It's very off topic as Fravor had nothing to do with gimbal.

They'd possibly be on historical flight trackers right? edit also that's a Canberra right?

Isn't the whole point that it is not that common which is what lead to it being a UAP?

You need to find the relevant quotes and TV/documentary appearances of those "big names" who say it is a rotating object and have them in your video. You need to point out exactly who said and stood by the rotating claim. Specifically Fravor (if he ever did.) Point out who was at TTSA when they...

I think they've concluded that it likely doesn't matter by now, the video has been all over the news looking like a rotating flying saucer with "Navy confirms UFOs" as the banner text for long enough now that this debate is irrelevant to the wider PR battle. The horse is long gone.

Noting the content of the sticker, there might be a political motivation.

So my impression is that this part is part of the sticker that is folded up slightly, the grab is attempt to peel it off from here, but there's not enough purchase so it only gets a small part and the rest gets stuck back down.

Things like this stick to your fingers without intention, glue/static etc the sticker is designed to adhere to things and be difficult to remove.

Did we talk about the shape changes of the Gimbal "glare/object" in the main thread? Watching Mick's tool loop the video, the shape changes as the video progresses with the "diffraction spikes" getting more apparent as it progresses, which seems like it would be consistent with the heat source...

The course is free to attend, not sure if the deliverers have to pay to host it.

You can see that some of the sticker is ripped off during the second attempt because it goes from to What is happening likely is either the second attempt re-adheres some of the corner and then tears off a little bit from the top, or some previously ripped part stuck to the thumb reattaches...

https://online.umich.edu/teach-outs/ufos-scanning-the-skies-teach-out/ It's on Teach-Out which seems to be a platform for people offer courses on what they want, i.e. it's not a University of Michigan course proper. https://online.umich.edu/what-is-a-teach-out/ However they are listing it...

You adding buildings just adds some more context clues for our brains to start assigning scales/distances to. The curve doesn't really affect things apart from making the mountains seem shorter a little, but mountains are something we are used to from our local experiences which is why really...