Search results

It's interesting how much these 3 ATLFIR videos have dominated the narrative, GIMBAL especially. To point where a quite a few UFO proponents are happy to "give" us prosaic explanations for most new videos/pictures especially civilian ones.

The whole debate over gimbal largely boils down to "could the video be explained by artefacts/glitches caused by the way the system is designed and operates." Makes me wonder given the classified nature of the equipment how many people there are in the world who would actually have detailed...

What we are saying is that a common optical illusion can either legitimately confuse people, or be knowingly exploited to make odd looking videos on YouTube. Or you can know about it and still notice it when you see it and can recognise places where the optical illusion is likely to occur as...

You can be tricked when walking or moving your head by a stationary light and moving or distant one in a dark sky, say a streetlight and a plane. You just need a lack of reference points and you can see movement that isn't there.

What timestamp is the Plaza sign readable?

So lists of things you can query are here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features

This is incredibly useful stuff, thanks. Should certainly be added to the tools thread. I'm wondering if there are any cold cases this could be applied to..

Not 100% though, I think people might point that out as a criticism even though it makes no real difference to the theory, the pod is mounted off centre so when the aircraft rotates the full pod assembly translates around that axis as well as rotating. This movement only occurs when the...

Not why I am getting "disagree" on my comments, just trying to help Mick with things to mention in his new video to help people visualise this scenario best. It's a very difficult setup to conceptualise.

I think you might want to clarify that the ATFLIR is not centrally mounted on the planes roll axis so when the plane rolls the ATFLIR does not 100% share it's roll transform by movement of the whole pod alone (not sure how important this is) I also think example pictures of cockpit eye view...

The range I think refers to the laser target designator, the ATFLIR is more than an IR camera.

I gave up with my Blender simulation, there are too many variables we just don't know to make it worthwhile. Cloud size/feature size, height/distance The object is very likely glare so we really have no way of knowing it's size/distance/direction/speed as it's apparent size is largely based on...

For a blender sim any speed used would need to be ground calibrated.

Yeah that's my main issue a monetised video using a debunk from here becomes the popular source and then is tainted by being on a monetised channel, not much we can do about it though I agree and spreading the debunking word is probably for the best.

on a different note, how do we feel about people (not Mick of course) taking our debunking work packaging it into a YT video and maybe trying to monetise the channel? It seems UFO videos are a bit of a revenue generator.

https://web.archive.org/web/20190921061101/https://thevault.tothestarsacademy.com/tictacreport/tag/AAV

Yeah the original video is a horizontal phone video in mov format on MUFON. Like the flares video there seems to be a trend of YouTube channels taking MUFON videos and reposting them then cross promoting on Reddit/Twitter. Probably taking advantage of the current UAP flap to boost subscribers...

I'm not seeing anything other than standard 'phone camera at night' aberrations, compression artifacts and motion blur. What the hell are they talking about alien heads for? Seems like a case of I want to believe pareidolia. Distant objects in focus will show in front of foreground out of focus...

They don't show on adsbexchange either which sometimes has more planes than fr24

Yup looks like landing lights, the location is gonna be difficult to nail down, really wish people could be more specific about times/locations.