Search results

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/obama-admits-classified-ufo-knowledge.12035/#post-258197

USO is a play on UFO meaning Unidentified Swimming Object.

What is debunked is the claims about the videos. Go Fast is claimed to be low and fast, it is actually high and slow. FLIR1 is supposed to show extraordinary acceleration, what it actually shows is a loss of tracking and a zoom which creates this effect. Gimbal has other rotations of artefacts...

Additionally the narrative seems to be shifting to somehow the debunkers are the ones making an invalid assumption that the range is to the target. I figured this might happen when Lehto did his 1st video. Just to be clear the TTSA (with Elizondo present) were the ones to say this (perfectly...

It's impossible to tell if its flapping or just artefacts of compression etc. The balloon theory is posited on the range displayed being from radar and thus it being a balloon with a radar reflector, it's unclear but probably less likely that a large bird would show up as a track on a the...

I think saying "no it isn't" really didn't reflect that this was merely your opinion.

This is the page that Wikipedia references, it seems to inidcate that Venus is easily visible in the daylight. https://www.skysurfer.eu/daystars.php

I think Venus is the most likely candidate the -4 mag figure is a ballpark you can read more about the source of the the Wikipedia quotes in the reference for the table

Here's the original video Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnRL_-7ygTs&t=0s here's a sign of the objectivity of the witness Venus was magnitude -3.68 almost directly overhead Wikipedia lists objects around -4 as being daylight visible even at the brightest time of day. −4...

If it helps my comment was not meant to ridicule, I can't help how other people reacted.

More or less far fetched than some sort of extra-terrestrial/dimensional craft?

The claim is little like me saying I was driving down the road the other day and saw an ant doing the macarena on the pavement.

So it seems that these photos will be featured on a Discovery TV show in September, where I am sure they will dedicate some time to showing us how these photos are a long exposure of a medical helicopter. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHXjZagCrWdnkkx1rlpuqVg Oddly they did not seem to agree...

The images are tiny, they are 5Kb this is ludicrously low levels of information for a phone picture. They are practically thumbnails. Even using the built in share functions on a phone would not send images this small. This shows some level of intent, you have to work to send this poor of a...

Are we sure the people in the video are actually looking at them? They look like insects/birds in the freeze frames.

On pure maths yeah but there's enough references to numbers ending 88 and 1688 itself that the number 1688 might be special in some way and less likely to be purely random.

It seems like it is way more complicated/specific based on some googling Possibly 1688 is a default code. I think it's no longer safe to say they are the same flight etc based on PRF code alone. codes ending in 88 seem to be at the end of ranges https://github.com/acemod/ACE3/issues/967...

Man how did I not makes that connection that there was an 8 in the PRF in the videos, that is another sim not being accurate issue then.

It really depends on how the codes are cycled. The original claim was early in the analysis from a reddit post claiming that it was highly unlikely and the PRF codes were mission specific. I reanalysed that post from Reddit Source...

It's a sharpening algorithm in the ATFLIR as well, glows/auras around high contrast objects are common with a few post processing techniques.