Search results

As far as we know the camera can physically, optically change its FOV like a DSLR/Mirrorless camera we think by actually changing lenses rather than by a single 'zoom' lens situation (although this might be wrong..) this is WFOV, MFOV and NAR. The zoom seems to refer to an digital zoom where...

The FLIR video does switch to TV mode but the video is very blurry and the camera appears out of focus so it's just a blob. So it seems IR and TV are not independently captured to video its whatever the pilot/WSO chose at the time that ends up on tape. In most of the videos in IR mode the...

Moon doesn't rise till 2:30am BST

Wow, with the bright light in the window that sure was confusing, amazing there was a high res photo of the exact same scene a really good case study.

I would not put it past a bored student in Devon to take the the pic accidentally and try their luck.

It looks like it's behind a window so is it actually an internal light? Actually maybe not there is a light outside the window as per the rain drop refractions, is it the same light though.. Hmm I'm torn between the light being inside the apartment or outside, it being outside doesn't seem to...

Pretty much, the military footage leaks so far have been limited to older systems, for which a lot of the technical data is available. However judging by some of the posts on the sim forums there are some niche aspects revealed in them though that were not covered in the publicly available...

It's trying to explain what is said in the written report with the video. Because the video does not match the written report as it stands so either the video is of a different event than the one described the report writer was mistaken on how events happened as per the video.

Cruise missile like a Tomahawk. I think the debate is "is there a known object that could account for most/some of the details of the accounts" of course it probably doesn't match all of them but some of them could be inaccurate, of course we'd be picking and choosing, but sometimes if 90% of...

Literally doing nothing to the original photograph and posting it on g drive is all they need do, I am as technical as all hell and that will help me best find out what they represent. When people do not do this simple stuff it makes me wonder if they don't want things looked at to closely.

Dietrich now 'active' on Reddit UFOs Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/oc7748/radio_check Pity no one will come here..

Honestly I have no idea what they did, I think they either wanted to show or wanted to look like they were showing metadata from the UFO photo, so they seemingly took a screenshot of the photo on the phone at home and showed that metadata via another screenshot inadvertently doxing themselves...

Ah well they join the ranks of other people who hindered investigation of the very thing they purportedly seek to solve, seemingly for no reason.

I want the file itself so I can interrogate the metadata myself. I know what I'm looking for. I can't make it any clearer than that, getting select parts of the metadata by request is not conducive to an open investigation, share the evidence.

Great, however sharing the photo as is with metadata intact is what we need to check it ourselves. It's very easy to do this, reluctance to do so is a classic sign of not being honest about wanting a full investigation.

Unless they post the original photo with exif intact somewhere it's meaningless.

Real science is often a little boring, but it's the only way we get solid theory's and actual breakthroughs.

Half of them can't even tell the various reports/videos apart. details are constantly conflated, possibly intentionally more likely not. It shows how much thought they've really put into the evidence they claim convinces them we have been visited by ET. If there are truly no more Navy videos to...

Makes me wonder have we seen the leaked last video from the Navy? This is so uncompelling surely they can't have anything better left to leak?