Search results

I note that both the YT videos are now marked private.

They probably just gave you their house address, so you may want to warn them that they may have doxed themselves.

That exif indicates a screen capture as the resolution is the same as the phone's display and not the main camera. https://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z5-7534.php Resolution 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~428 ppi density) Ask for the full original photo to be uploaded to a file sharing...

https://nypost.com/2021/06/27/navy-tic-tac-ufo-witness-demands-public-apology-for-ridicule/ Kevin Day now reportedly wants an apology and financial redress. "I and others deserve a formal public apology and a redress for the costs I/we paid."

To be fair you had whale to add as a search term based on the OP here, I guess you could think "what causes splashes in the ocean?" and add whale. I'm interested in whether this was done.

I'm curious as to what steps you took/how you found the image? I mean it's compelling it just seems oddly fortunate to stumble on a close match.

Okay whilst the 2 island shots waves don't match, there seems to be match between the waves in the second island shot and the 1st zoomed in shot.

They are all mirrored in post, the numbers down the bottom are the same They are square cropped, but the vignette is fairly even if they were taken at 4:3 then scanned and cropped the vignette should be less on one side and not so even? Splash show motion blur yet triangle doesn't show much at...

Aw man I was going to do that compare

As far as I can tell the MFOV and NAR modes can be digitally zoomed to half the FOV. 2.8 at 2.0 would be 1.4 So NAR is 0.7 and NAR 2.0 is 0.35

For what it's worth the elevation angle is described in the sim documents as: Lookpoint Elevation Indication - The FLIR's current elevation angle in degrees relative to the horizon is displayed here. Negative values are below the horizon and positive values are above.

Given Bigelow kickstarted the whole thing it was never setup to succeed at rational analysis. Probably more to generate UFO videos with the US Gov "seal of approval." It seems pretty clear they have never been rigorously investigated, so anyone claiming the "worlds largest military has put all...

It reads to me like this "There was never any real deep analysis of some of this stuff, now everyone is asking about it so can we have some money/scientists/engineers who know what they are doing for the small amount of cases of less immediately explicable stuff"

Some of your claims are not like the others When we have evidence and a claim about said evidence we check the evidence (video) matches the claim, i.e. the Nimitz object speed. When we just have a claim (RADAR data), that claim is not backed up with evidence, well we can just say that seems...

It's in some of the recent "when" posts on Reddit. It think the 29th has always the been the "latest" it can be released.

Rumour mill seems to have the report being released on 29th June now.

My guess is pilots really, really care about RADAR altitude when operating from carriers and know it will switch to baro anyway and don't care about the flashing B.

Re the B flashing I gather it's flashing because the operator has selected RADAR altitude which is only used for near to the ground but is more accurate, ie for landing etc. But it doesn't work at high altitudes so the plane has switched to show barometric altitude but if it's flashing the B to...

Does does your refraction calculator take into account the wavelength of IR used by the camera? If the even matters.

I'd be interested in the steps taken to get the 99.9 displayed.