Search results

Yeah that number is 25000ft barometric altitude.

Maybe down res Gimbal so the text looks the same and see what it does to the object.

Mostly seems to be a featureless black triangle with the same light pattern as a plane's landing lights.

Actually I might be wrong it might be 0.7 with 1.5 bring NAR 1.0

Gimbal is NAR at 2.0 digital zoom so this is probably an FOV of ~0.35 with NAR at 1.0 being 0.7.

I would love to get my hands on either but they are for US gov employees only.

We have discussed this radar clip here https://www.metabunk.org/threads/uss-omaha-ufo-uap-radar-video.11762/ The basics seem to be this is "surface and just above" level system i.e. for tracking boats and helicopters, but it's full capabilities are not fully know, Nor is it know if it is...

Is there possible value in subtracting the jet azimuth line from the gimbal azimuth line to look for variance?

Failed missile test could work with the missile vectoring all over the place with a damaged engine.

Honestly it reads to me like they are pointing out his appeal to authority isn't even relevant to the thing he goes on to talk about. It's like a double fallacy. Him being a pilot is an appeal to authority even if he talks about piloting, but saying "I am pilot and here's some stuff on optics"...

The issue is he is the one trying to use this work history to engender a sense of authority regarding the matters he talks about.

Re G1 this is seen in the Go Fast video as well.

The difference is backing it up with evidence and demonstrations/experiments and other sources, also being open for discussion.

It was nice of them to give us 3 videos all from the same platform, however I wonder if now we know a lot about if we'll ever see an ATFLIR video from them again.

The DCS sim as far as I know does not simulate full IR at all it I imagine it just puts a different shader on the normal visible light view, non of the complex optical effects will be recreated. I imagine trying to simulate these effects and aberrations is very complex and I wonder if there is...

Does he have the actual raw location data or the FOIA response? Can we get historical cloud cover satellite imagery?

They being the pilots and the other they being? We reach this odd stalemate Somebody want us to think the US Navy is encountering unusual "non human" craft in the sky/at sea. Somehow those people have enough insider knowledge and access to leak some footage from planes/pilots/ships that they...

We have so little actual info, but as this is the same plane/crew as Go Fast so if the range we see in Go Fast is a RADAR range shown because of ATFLIR LOS correlation with a RADAR track we might expect that the same thing would happen in Gimbal but there is no range presented which would seem...

'We are ignoring one of Lehto's points though: the size of the object can be calculated/approximated by looking at the apparent size of the IR picture." How? Describe this mathematically.

This is the "UFO 'enthusiasts' all the way down" scenario, where it turns out they are the ones asking themselves what's going on and leaking whatever they can to themselves having got access to the veneer of being "The Pentagon" by Bigelow's influence. Anything they got hold of that looked...