Search results

Ah true, if it's in relation to that claim then it certainly is "tatty". For me I just think it fits in with the quality of the rest of the photo (which isn't great). I read at some point a high resolution image will be released so perhaps more of these questions will be answered then.

Nah, I said "leaning back" (as in "looking up"). Yeah, that's what I can't work out. Doesn't seem possible to me.

Can someone explain how people are seeing a possible reflection? There's clouds, a fence, trees, and a plane and the photographer is looking up. How would that work?

I think arrowheads are pretty much worldwide: iirc the oldest ones were found in Africa and Asia while Europeans have used bows and arrows for many thousands of years. PS I know you meant "Scotland". ;)

It doesn't seem tattier than it should do to me, given the quality of the photo. Also pretty symmetrical:

So a double exposure? Though if there were six of these photos...

There's some very nice fence analysis on the link that Ravi posted. Steers more towards a standard farmer's fence (including highlighting what may be little tufts of animal fur caught on it). It is an odd angle to take a photo from. The fence the guys in the video identify looks to be about...

These guys here reckon they've found a candidate for the fence, about half a mile outside the village: Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgekUVzMSCc&t=2100s&ab_channel=DisclosureTeam The one in the photo looks to me more like the angled top part of a chain link fence though, like this...

Also worth stressing that Piccard didn't actually say this, they are the words of the writer of the article.

Looks like The History Channel's 'The Proof is Out There' recently featured the Chilean case among it's "Top 5 UFO Sightings" (first one): Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwZZd2u9Pm4 Their conclusion? "No one can identify what the Chilean navy caught on video so we're going to call...

Do you mean that it shows that a loud noise can occur without being picked up by a microphone? He wasn't hearing an explosion, was he?

Watching that clip again I think I might have to disagree with my own sentence of two years ago: That he thinks he's seeing an explosion isn't clear either - all that's clear is that "explosion" is the word he used to describe seeing the tower coming down. I imagine his brain was going a mile...

https://www.amazon.com/David-Confetti-Parties-Jewish-Party/dp/B0075LF1XS

Video here: Source: https://youtu.be/4NBZeljMpIU?t=1348 I wonder why they waited till they got home to see what they'd photographed? And why they only took one picture for something so exciting? Seems a bit of a tall tale to me.

I think y'all know it but just in case not: a fraccionamiento is like a neigbourhood so will encompass quite a lot of streets (translates as something like "division"). Probably this whole area in red:

Ah, no - to clarify: "special right triangles" is what they're called in America (and normal right-angled triangles are just called "right triangles"). It's all equal rights these days. ;)

In British English they're called "special right-angled triangles" - and more specifically "angle-based" (as opposed to "side-based"). In American English all right-angled triangles are called "right triangles".

Your take was what one would get from reading in between the lines of what I wrote (there's lots implied in that anecdote, but obviously no need to spell it all out). Agreed. :)

Same take, not different.

An anecdote that I consider one of the more interesting tidbits I've come across in this area: I once asked a conspiracy theorist who seemed to believe everything was a false flag/media lie if there were any events he considered had actually happened. After careful consideration he told me the...