Search results

Attributed to Feynman as well as Einstein and Rutherford, but after a quick search I can't confirm any of them as coining the similar saying.

Workbench explainer was genius. I also felt at the end when other instances of jet engine glare looking like the shape in the Gimbal video were mentioned I would have loved to have seen some quickfire examples. For me, things like that really help the penny drop.

True. Tongue was in cheek for sure. What's an ETO?

I hope nobody's ruling out that there might be aliens hiding behind the advertising banner.

And all the alien believers who dislike Mick's work can say "he doesn't know what he's talking about - it's not hiding anything interesting at all". :D

When I watched Mick's video and heard him say, basically, "who knows? just because it's most likely a standard jet engine glare it doesn't mean there isn't a spaceship hiding behind it" I took that to be a cheeky little gentlemanly pandering to those who wouldn't want the idea dismissed...

Our friends at Third Phase of Moon looked at this video in July 2020. Their first analyst says "he thinks he's figured it out" and then after looking at the various objects for a while says: Source: https://youtu.be/ZcbC97gy8oo?t=151 Betcha didn't see that coming. ;) As for lozenges, I...

Nah, he "shot down" drone or plane, but for balloon he said "it's extremely rare for a solar balloon to reach this altitude". And "extremely rare" = "not impossible" = "sometimes they reach this altitude" = "possible". This echoes their earlier look at balloons where he says "regular helium...

It was a serious question. I wasn't sure who you were referring to (eg, the presenter, one of the "experts", or someone who had shared/commented on the clip).

No one's doing what? Standing up to see the sun set twice? I did it a few weeks ago. :)

I remember seeing this a while ago. Don't suppose knowing the WSO was working at the Pentagon by 2019 is much help in narrowing it down though. https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/navy/gradisher-ufo.pdf Great video Mick! :)

He also concluded that "it's possibly a balloon" - and his process of elimination led him to going with "unidentified", not "aliens" (obviously kinda clumsy to "eliminate" something it might be - but that's TV for ya). Anyways, I'll just stick with the words. But others are of course welcome to...

"Genuine unidentified object" =/= "aliens" "Humans might not be the only pilots up in the sky" =/= "concluded"

Full quote: "One theory is that if we were visited by another civilisation they might send a probe ahead of when they actually come." Non-specific theories and "mights" =/= "concluded in this specific case".

It's interesting looking up the first of their "experts", the woman who most explicitly brought the idea of an "alien probe" into the discussion, Amy Eskridge, "President of the Institute For Exotic Science". Unfortunately it appears that the institute's website is defunct; its twitter inactive...

Who concluded aliens?

That's a really great example. Especially to see how dramatically different the apparent shape and colour are, even until very close. I guess the balloon in the OP could be just about any shape or colour.

IFO - identified floating object. Silver cube balloons very common: Who's Mike? :p

You could screenshot: Or here's one that you can copy-paste: https://sgadaria.expressions.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Iraq-article_Gershkoff_Kushner.pdf

Definitely. And it will be interesting to see if the apparent trend indicated by the Navalny polls shows up in the next larger scale and wider spread poll.