Search results

Yup, like also OP demonstrated in his attached video "moonx04.mp4"

I also remember Mr. Burchett mentioning a "dinner together" very briefly, during his opening talk. I paraphrased.

Sorry, what is this all about? Any links, etc? I am not an expert in ufology.

He did mention (paraphrase) that he knows how funding that was supposed to go to a specific program, internally was re-assigned to secretive black(?) programs. Without any funding authority knowing about it.

The story from Matt Gaetz was interesting. Also, knowing he came to a very high clearance level. The only thing we need now, is that footage, so we can analyse it ourselves. :cool:

Can or may they then also not use any of the information for use in their work in Congress?

So, if in this "SCIF" thing the members of Congress get to know the real info, do they then themselves need to keep their mouth shut?

Of course, Burchett bringing his Baptism into the game.. Sigh.

I see the chat has been disabled in the live video. Wise decision, but will probably again be seen as a censorship by all the True Believers.

"Bring in witness number 4, mr X#^ZIP from planet Zatunx, would you answer our questions please?"

Looking at this tweet from Anna Paulina Luna, does she say this with in mind that people will be watching that have never heard of if before? Or does she claim that a lot of new info will be talked about today? I mean, other than talking about stuff, we will not see new video or photos. Unless I...

Indeed. I wonder if we have enough data/video length to draw a conclusion.

Its speed? How much is that then, and how did you make the calculation?

I read that too. But I cannot find where anymore..

I am certain Sprite is talking about the instrument balloons appearing as white blobs on the footage. I believe (cannot find a link) this was all planned and done to support the experiments. If I am wrong, I am happy to be corrected.

Very simple: if it would exist (remote viewing), we would see/know examples of it. None to be found.. The examples as mentioned in OP, are in my view too vague and open to interpretation.

Interestingly, over at Reddit/ufos they are going completely insane over all this. I don't post there anymore, to maintain my sanity. Luckily this MB forum is much more down to Earth.

I am pretty convinced the red band is likely the stray angular light effect as similarly seen in Mick's post #97. It makes sense, the red is predominant in the parts in the scene that are "sandy", showing the effect of material/texture on the light reflectance.

No, merely a change in the data offset. It has some on board data reduction stuff going on, surely, so also calibration differences can happen from scan to scan likely.

If I may hook on, I think the effect is caused by multiple scans being combined into one image. The dashed cone I overlayed in the picture below, is roughly the FoV of a single point cloud scan. And in the combined cloud then can show slight offsets, making the sharp cuts visible in the image...