Search results

Hmmmmmmmm mr Scott Bray claims the "green triangles" are undetermined. Well, ehrrrrr no? Is he missing the facts we presented or what? Is this the level we are now at? Is this the state of the art we expect?

Thanks Mendel and Mick for the tips, but I leave it to you guys to record.

Nice! Thanks for the pointer, downloaded it and now trying it. It looked easier than I thought. I cannot select the YT video... (sources: window, it is red and also audio is disabled?) I give up.

i don't have any recording software to do so, perhaps someone has? EDIT I watched a few older hearings, just to understand how it all goes about. I was not impressed. It is mainly talking heads and monologues. If the upcoming hearing is similar, then there is nothing that indicates we will see...

Would it not also be visible in the other frames too? I mean, nothing changes from frame to frame (except flight position).

I am going to watch the event, just to know what was really said. Surely we will discuss it over here thoroughly and being Metabunk we have to stay with the facts.

I am ready, with my bag of crisps and a crate of beer. This is going to be better entertainment than DeppVSHeard! Seriously though, half of the ufo community over at Reddit are having a field day.

I am 100% sure there was an event in the 60's which would have the same points. Hilarious how in the ufo world they keep op running in circles. It seems almost deliberate.

Photogrammetry.

That shop likely used some macro or tool in their software to automatically remove those artefacts.

Hmm, I have a hard time seeing the resemblance. Can you point it out more?

I was zooming into the photographs of the prints shown on a table, as found in Mick's post #14. I am lost with how many prints there are but nevertheless, I see some odd marks around the "ufo" on this image, which is not seen in in the scan if post #1. Some rough outline of the shape. Could it...

In line with what is mentioned above, this link provides some more info on laser plasma tech. Us navy laser creates plasma ufos

Ok, you are right. Sorry. I just remember the Robbert vd Broeke case so well, as featured on that website.

I just had a hilarious case of convulsive laughter, after skimming through the link's pages. Sorry. In all seriousness, what you are bringing forth as "reference material" is a bit weak, to say the least.

@TopBunk The clone indication is quite a good one. But how would this work? The artefact is on analog film, why would someone manipulate the scanned version?

I would have liked this theory, if all the frames of that series would have this artefact on the exact same spot.

Excellent shots! I am sure it took some effort to get the exposure time correct?

I find it interesting the top edge of the oval is much sharper as compared to the edge on the bottom. Something that would have physically have flown there would have sharp edges along the edge 100%.

Agreed, and this is what is a very large indicator (for CGI). I don't even think this tilting is possible in reality, as the disc will then 'shoot up or down' when tilting (due to the wind/speed), which we don't see. Ok, I forgot ufos can ignore wind :-D