Search results

Either

I appreciate you pointing to it, thanks. I can google search, but sorry, also very limited in time, therefore I kindly asked.

Can someone provide a link to a research study, showing that masks protect? Genuinely eager to know. I am not interested in anecdotical stories etc.

A large part of the light hitting the sensor is reflected back to the lens/objective in front. About 25% of the light gets back reflected, and the cover glass can cause artefacts. This also is the reason why the reflection is a perfect mirror of the source (lamp). I have used CCD cameras where...

Must say the happenings currently in Australia are a bit uhm, well, frightening.. They seem to get a little nutty very quickly.

Agreed, I thought the same. Especially obvious at the moment the noise is heard and he says "oh, that's quick!".. By they way. I assume the aliens are getting a bit annoyed with us by sending this bloody boring CE6 message all the time?

Here is an interesting article about the notion of non-perfect Faraday "cages". https://physicsworld.com/a/are-faraday-cages-less-effective-than-previously-thought/ Of course, a bag with a tiny thin aluminium layer can never be perfect.

Well, I have to start somewhere, and that is to first try and trust what they claim. They claim to be honest in choosing randomly. Can we prove they did not? Just to make sure here, I am the first to say this is all bullcrap and CE6 shit, but I want to make a solid case. But I am sure you knew...

The thing is though that they choose a walkie at random, and we do not see them change the squelch settings of this one. And as the frequency is all the same, I wonder how this can be done (lets leave video editing alone). Of course, we have to consider, that the person on the right did not...

These bags are not blocking sufficiently. This, because the metal layer is only microns thick. Not enough. Of course, if in the video they would use another Faraday cage (a proper one), they could check that. But yeah, no.

I have not read the whole thing, where you got this info from, but I am sure this is not correct. Unless I miss understand your text above, you cannot inject RF signals into a fibre optic cable. Perhaps you mean RF cabling (waveguide)?

Indeed! Post this on Reddit and you will gain 3985686 karma points, easily. Just don't reveal it is a helicopter, but a sophisticated alien made, mile long super structure, zipping around.

The post from reddit begins with a claim. In this case, it says "exact same thing". I beg to differ, I see apart from them floating , in size and colour, i see no match. I am also not surprised a largish helium balloon could look like a dangling bag (large at top, the helium container), as the...

Agreed. I am also Dutch and have seen this effect before. It depends also on the cloud formations how visible it can be.

It makes probably more sense to search for examples @Itsme, that have an object at similar range as the GIMBAL. Your example in post #142 is a jet at close(ish) range. A smaller looking object of a jet far away is of course more easier obscured by glare. I believe Mick demenstrated it in a...

Who is talking about 360 degree view? Not me.

I am sorry, but I am sure the ATFLIR is not only made for looking down. I cannot prove my statement though (no specification docs online of course), but perhaps you have some links or docs showing your point?

Thanks. Indeed, that full frame bump motion does not look correlated to any rotation.

Maybe you can pin-point a bit more where it happens. It is better for the context of this thread I think. Maybe a small extracted gif?

Although I am completely agreeing with your comment above, I must correct though that some consumer cameras do rotate the lens element(s) when focussing/zooming. It is quite a bit related to the price tag. The foreward scattered stray light we are seeing in the gimbal video, can easily be...