Search results

Cool. Where do I collect my prize? ;)

Teignmouth, that's where I witnessed the 1999 solar eclipse, on the beach. It was surreal! Anyway. Indeed this looks like a false horizon. There seems to be a bigger light source behind some clouds? The moon?

Vertically elongated blob with a bigger diameter on top. Moving laterally at a low, constant, silent pace. Yeah, cannot be a balloon. :rolleyes:

Just wondering about the frame that contains the most detail of the triangle. I see some "lines" or at least a pattern on the side of this "craft". What was the idea behind this from the hoaxer I wonder, to mimic reflections from the sea?

I think at least ball lightning can be replicated or simulated in a lab.

When I do a simple google "what is the highest altitude for a balloon", I get this:

Very good point. It looks actually quite severe as well. I cannot imagine a prof camera system would perform so poorly (bad optical design), so I agree it might be artificially added "nostalgia effects".

And formerly those on Reddit claimed that these craft can enter the water without resistance. It is hilarious.

Could very well be the Starlink train. Sadly the video is too short and has not enough pixels to resolve the freaking object. So what is new.

The calculation is not wrong, but there are two different cases. One case is that someone gets injected with the vaccin (voluntarily). The other case is the one where you catch the virus involuntarily (by chance). Both can give you problems (chance), but the premise is very different.

I have seen weird shaped clouds before, and certainly ones that look like a "rocket launch". I would not rule out the possibility they are just NLC. You can not claim that this is impossible! But perhaps you want it to be a rocket launch?

"We need a lot of money now to research the UAPs, but we will never tell you where we allocate the money to. We promise to use it wisely"...

Yeah, i find it rather useless to discuss with these types, as they have no clue about radiometry.

Another nail in the coffin indeed. Sadly, as expected of course, there are plenty of redditors still dismissing this as "no real proof". It is ridiculous, I stopped arguing over there, it just makes me mad.

:D :cool:

argumentum ab auctoritate Even experienced people sometimes make mistakes in identifying things.

Very nice example! Also the low hanging clouds/mist will increase the likelihood these "shadows" get noticed by observers. This was/is a discussion on Reddit (of course), where people are saying "but if these lamps are always on, why don't we see pictures and video more often?". The answer is...

Too bad the person "ran out of film". smh

You are right, I missed it! True, optical zoom is always better. But at least it would've saved me from zooming in in the video myself. :cool:

How about zooming in? All phones can zoom.