Search results

It may be a humorous hoax by persons unknown, or it may be an accidental release of celebration balloons or novelty balloons, or it may be a deliberate attempt to distract the Reaper drone by an antagonist faction of some sort. A fake object created by aliens to deceive is way down the list...

It looks like Shax is correct, and the dangling appendages do move slightly. So maybe it is subject to a slight breeze.

We have no evidence that they did. They just saw it by chance.

My opinion is that this cluster of balloons is floating in relatively still air, with no movement at all; all of the apparent movement is caused by the movement of the drone filming the object/cluster of objects. One might expect a cluster of balloons in relatively still air would show little...

It is definitely in near-focus for part of the time, and looks a lot like a cluster of weird balloons. There are two distinct segments to this clip. however; the second segment is much less clear, and seems to show that the 'object' has changed shape significantly. Perhaps the balloons have...

A random collection of Eid balloons might explain the strange shape. This might just be a curious accident, a random escape of drifting balloons, or a deliberate hoax. I'm not convinced by my own graphic here, but it doesn't seem entirely impossible.

I'm looking at celebration balloons for Eid and Ramadan. Some of those are quite elaborate, especially the ones depicting script. That may not be the case. In still air, a bunch of balloons might remain surprisingly static; if all the movement is caused by parallax then the balloons may...

It reminds me of a flying reindeer.

Do we have an image of this image yet?

The photo of the white balloons released at a wedding looks interesting. I have seen mass balloon releases before; they quickly disperse, but you can still spot the occasional example for some time afterwards. Since this sighting seems to consist of several separate but otherwise identical...

That's true. Anyone who has looked through a decent telescope would be familiar with this slow, steady movement. In the Northern hemisphere this is almost always from left to right, except for a region near the pole star, where the movement is more circular in nature.

Who is providing this commentary? Is it live, or added later? If the commentary was added later, then how do they know which direction it was moving, if any?

The point-like object at 3:14:44 certainly looks like Venus. It is quite difficult to see Venus at 11:00 in the morning, but not impossible, and since this camera has a fairly powerful telephoto lens, it is not unlikely that Venus is the culprit here. Source: https://youtu.be/Gn0xAEMXhd8?t=11684

I agree with this. The balloon has a logo on one side; this may affect its smoothness sufficiently that the balloon rotates until the smoothest parts of the balloon face into the wind and the rough parts face away (or maybe vice versa), and after that the balloon would not rotate significantly...

Excellent! A microbiologist should be aware that it is unlikely that any biological alien microbiota has ever been in contact with the biosphere of Earth, since every organism yet identified on this planet (macroscopic or microscopic) evolved here on this world from a common ancestor about four...

Yes, that is my impression. The balloon stays more-or-less stationary, but the drone filming it is rising very rapidly. I have to say that the person operating the camera did a very good job of remaining focused on the balloon. Perhaps they have had a lot of practice.

Quite possibly, although sidelobes don't quite look like that. Perhaps they represent both at once.

Concerning the strange shapes on the patch; Note that the lower left-hand side of the patch shows a spherical ball, plus a series of strangely shaped pylons: it may show a ball-shaped radar cross-section test article, and the pylons used by EG&G to hoist them aloft. Here is a picture of some...

Another example of this is the May Incident. In WWII, Congressman Andrew J May accidentally disclosed some secrets to the Japanese Navy, just by careless talk. This accidental disclosure probably sank 10 submarines and killed 800 men. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_J._May#The_May_Incident

This is true. I've noticed another trend; calling them 'Non-Human Intelligences'. This would include robots and AI in general. Robots wouldn't have DNA, so my preferred test (DNA analysis) wouldn't work. Future humans would have human DNA, possibly with a few genetic enhancements, so my...