Search results

If the photos were taken a few fractions of a second apart, that would probably rule out a balloon, unless there was a very fast breeze a few tens of metres above their heads. A smaller, closer, faster-moving lightweight object might fit the bill - a small piece of windblown silver paper would...

The First Men in the Moon by H.G. Wells was a best seller on both sides of the Atlantic, and elsewhere. It influenced a wide range of science fiction output in the century that followed, especially the depiction of large-brained, vaguely humanoid aliens. It has been filmed four times. The movie...

The Russian Soyuz spacecraft use a teddy bear on a string; when the bear floats, they are in microgravity.

The cube-inside-a-sphere sighting could be as simple as a single novelty balloon with another balloon inside it. An easy trick to do, even with a helium-filled balloon. As seen from a passing jet the details would be very difficult to make out. Source: https://youtu.be/r7l2f7Wcq3g?feature=shared

That might work. During a reboost, there are probably quite significant air currents along the length of the interior.

One possibility I didn't consider is that this particle was filmed during a reboost; in that situation, the ISS is steadily moved in one direction, making anything not firmly attached to the vessel fall steadily behind. This includes astronauts, who are gradually pulled backwards as the ship...

Small dots of light in ISS clips are usually small ice particles emitted from the various external systems on the station. These ice particles tend to move in a straight line, unless they are caught in the exhaust from an attitude jet or rocket motor. However these small ice particles often...

The 'instantaneous acceleration' aspect to the Tic-tac sighting sounds suspiciously like the instantaneous acceleration at the end of the FLIR1 video. Both Fravor and (presumably) Dietrich watched Underwood's film on the Nimitz, and they may have subconsciously conflated this behaviour with...

The sound from any drone might be masked by ambient sound near the witness, such as heavy traffic noise, noisy machinery, the sound of a ship's engines and the sounds of the sea in general (many apparent sightings of drones from ships have been made in recent years, all without any mention of...

As noted above sea level rises and falls are caused by temperature changes, and to a much lesser extent, changes in the level of the ground due to geological processes. Natural sea-level changes therefore are almost exclusively caused by changes in the planet's overall temperature. 1/ The...

Note that the Fravor / Dietrich incident is only related to the FLIR1 video, which occurred on November 14, 2004. The Gimbal clip was recorded in 2014/5, although the exact date eludes me.

The 'Davis' memo is here, if anyone wants to look at it. I won't transcribe it, because it is a photograph of a document, and probably fake anyway. https://web.archive.org/web/20190614180424/https:/imgur.com/a/7D5xIGk

I suspect that Grusch also gives some credit to claims apparently made by Eric Davis and Kit Green in a memo to Robert Bigelow that the famous 'Alien Autopsy' film is real, or perhaps that it is a 'reconstruction' of real events. However none of these claims have been substantiated, and several...

ICR or LF - an internal camera reflection or lens flare.

Note that the thin altostratus or cirrostratus in that image is above the cumulus, and partially obscures it. In the plane vid the cumulus seems to cast shadows on the cirrus, which should not be possible if the photo is taken from above. One possible explanation for this is that the cloud...

In which case the cumulus should not be casting shadows on the cirrus.

The important factor here is the difference in level between the two cloud layers. In the 'MH370' 'satellite' video, there are two distinct cloud layers, a layer of fluffy cumulus and a layer of banded stratus, probably altostratus or cirrostratus. The stratus layer would be thousands of feet...

I see this too. It is inevitable that any real satellite video would show parallax effects between different cloud levels and between the clouds and the ground. Satellites move at 8-10km/s; they do not stand still. As far as I can see the cloud layer in the background of the alleged MH370...

Note how pixelated the edges of the clouds are after this correction. It seems fairly obvious that no such 'correction' has been applied to the 'MH370' video, therefore it is almost certainly a fake.

I've mentioned before that the perceived or remembered 'ping-pong' motion of the 'tic-tac' may have been conflation. Since both Fravor and Deitrich (and presumably any other witnesses not yet named ) will have seen Underwood's film, which shows some curious fluctuations and movements, they may...