Search results

You seem to be presenting a very garbled account of DNA laser printing (see this non-technical description, for instance). DNA is not "alive", it's just an organic molecule. Gene synthesis has been around for more than 40 years. This technique is just a quicker way of doing it. And it's way off...

And it has nothing to do with the weather. HAARP affects the ionosphere. Not much weather going on up there. Actually I should say "affected", because HAARP is no longer operational.

Talking of Glasgow and Edinburgh, are the Scots trying to drum up support for next week's referendum?

Without wanting to hijack this thread, I believe it is very much the former. LMH is not what I would call an unbiased investigator, especially when it comes to UFO/alien topics.

I've quoted these numbers at people and they just make vague claims that the chemical agent is some kind of catalyst for clouds to form. Most recently the claim has been that even if it is water, then "water is still a pollutant in the wrong place"! Even though at least 99.99% of that water...

It isn't given an exemption. Do you really think that anyone can just charter a plane and dump any chemicals they like into the air? Cloud seeding is strictly regulated. You need to have a licence to do it, and you can only use approved substances. In the USA this appears to be done on a...

Once again, the point is that "weather modification" has nothing to do with chemtrails. The UK has quite an active "chemtrail community", as its skies are among the busiest in the world, and yet cloud seeding is not carried out in the UK at all (there were some experiments done back in the...

I'm a snow lover, so that sounds like heaven to me, but if you had to live with it I can see it would get old pretty fast! Anyway, Ian ought to know about lake effect snow, because we do get it on a very minor scale in the UK when the wind comes from the east. A cold wind blowing from...

I've managed to find an online copy of the relevant episode. This segment was filmed in London on December 12, 1988.

The essence of the issue is that chemtrail believers constantly try to shoehorn any and every example of weather modification and/or geoengineering into the box marked "proof". But they never explain how the observed characteristics of persistent contrails (which they label "chemtrails") fit ANY...

One thing you haven't considered is the actual combustion process; for instance 1kg of jet fuel produces about 1.3kg of water when burned. Not that this makes much difference to the numbers! Back in 1972, Dr Robert Knollenberg of the University of Chicago conducted an experiment to find the...

No, that is totally incorrect. Chemtrails are not "nothing more than cloud seeding". "Chemtrails" are nothing more than frozen condensation. You don't seriously think that all those trails you see overhead are a massive programme of cloud seeding, do you? The point of this post is that talk of...

You are quite welcome to start a thread about this incident. I have actually studied this one in some detail, and I think it's pretty clear that the cause was a combination of unrelated and rather ordinary factors, chief among which was a lighthouse. (The key witnesses in their INITIAL...

Add lake-effect snow to the long list of weather that Ian thinks is "new and artificial". https://www.facebook.com/look.up.96387/posts/1493210794251445 Do we have any members here from the Great Lakes region? I think they might be able to tell him a thing or two about this phenomenon.

I'm camping on the south coast this weekend. Last night's sunset had what looked like cirrus uncinus to me, plus a few contrails. I thought that was meant to be a portent of rain on the way, but it's beautiful beach weather today.

I think if Ian continues along this route of ever more bizarre claims, even his followers are going to start deserting him. Incidentally "stripy legs and very long front legs", is indeed a perfect description of the missing-sector orb weaver, which is very widespread in Britain (and Europe as a...

Definitely deserving of a "winner" icon. As the father of a little girl who just started nursery school this week, I wish I could say that my response to losing a child that way and then being told I'm a liar and that she never existed would be so measured. On the pecking order of conspiracy...

I'm not disputing that the camera was panned down to the horizon upside down. But the Big Dipper was pretty much directly overhead. If you stood facing south and looked directly up, you'd see it as the right way up, as shown in Mick's screenshot. If you stood facing north and did the same thing...

I think it must depend on latitude: I often see the Big Dipper (or Plough as I call it) high in the sky and right-side up, but then I do live rather further north than Utah. Here is the sky chart for the date and time of the video in question. You can see that the Big Dipper is almost directly...

That last image makes a rather similar pattern to the "rod" photos beloved of Jose Escamilla. Of course, those are insects. Similar principle, though - solid body and periodic images on either side, whether caused by flashing beacons or light catching fast-beating wings.