Search results

When shown these images, Russ Tanner (of globalskywatch.com, who frequently collaborates with geoengineeringwatch.org), initially denied that the images had been fabricated. He claimed that they were different shots taken at different times. However he now says that he has spoken to Dane...

Yes, the GIF was resized to overlay and match the two images. That doesn't alter the basic message though.

It may be worth also identifying the images used by Geoengineeringwatch.org which are not Photoshopped, but which are presented as having something to do with climate engineering when they don't. For instance, the picture on this page...

Yes, you should have done chelation, which would make the metals appear, unless the metals didn't appear, in which case the chelation made the metals disappear. But we're veering off topic here.

Some further examples, not included in the video: Hospital emergency sign Geoengineeringwatch.org link: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/veteran-health-department-official-speaks-out-on-climate-engineering-dangers-again/ Original image, by Les Palenik, from Shutterstock...

Summary: several of the photographs on Geoengineeringwatch.org purporting to show "chemtrails" and "geoengineering" are actually montages, often using copyrighted photographs. This video (credit to @skephu) shows several examples: [Note: After the video was posted, GeoengineeringWatch.org...

An unusual collection of near-parallel trails, stopping abruptly. I don't think they came from flights close together in time though. Panoramic for context:

I think this may be my first hole punch cloud, taken this evening. Not the most sharply defined example though.

That error reminds me of an Apollo hoaxer trying to use absolute speeds rather than velocity changes in the formula E = ½mv2 to try and convince me that the lunar module rocket could not have carried enough fuel to perform the necessary accelerations. A conspiracy-oriented mindset combined with...

He already claims that all contrails, whether persistent or not, are actually chemtrails because of his "high-bypass turbofans don't make contrails" nonsense. This was written almost three years ago...

It's easy to win a debate when you won't allow your opponents to speak. (And state in advance that you won't accept any evidence that goes against your position.)

The aftermath of the Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989, showing downtown Santa Cruz.

Come on, everybody knows that to do a jigsaw most efficiently you first find all the straight edges! What kind of fuzzy female brain looks at the pretty colours? ;)

14 miles horizontally and 42,000 feet, or very nearly 8 miles, vertically. So a straight-line distance of sqrt(142 + 82), or just over 16 miles! See also this thread, with photos of contrails from over 100 miles and even 200 miles away...

And the last pages...

Continued...

A new purchase from Amazon: a Met Office cloud guide from 1949. No contrails but plenty of the clouds which chemtrail believers claim are new and artificial. These were just done using a phone camera. I could scan them properly when I have the time. (Edit: I realised I missed pages 2-3. Now...

I think that, in general, men just tend to be "geekier" than women and more likely to enjoy slightly obsessive hobbies, into which category I would insert spending time debunking stuff on the internet :)

As a regular bicycle commuter in London, I can confirm that far too many cyclists are killed by trucks in London. We have narrow, centuries-old streets and extremely heavy traffic; not a good combination for bikes.

Someone on YouTube getting a bit tetchy when it's pointed out that chemtrails are a hoax: He liked his own comment too :)