Search results

That depends on the encoding: minimally, it takes 1 bit.

Compare Mick's clip with yours: The contrails are jittering strongly, the smoke trails are not.

a normal person would call it a smoke trail because you think it is made up of smoke, not of condensation

it's NOT a contrail, otherwise it'd be the same temperature as the jet engine contrail. The orb is circling, therefore the orb trail is not straight, but follows the motion of the orb. But if you observe the place where the trail is attached to the orb, you see no movement there: the attachment...

Sorry, I'm not seeing it. The black orb trail (NOT a contrail) doesn't shake. Because the color is so similar to the background blue, it suffers more from compression artefacts, but the position is steady. Note that the artefacting never affects the trail as a whole.

so... you've done VFX work, but can't imagine where the contrails went?

Nitpick: any binary string of 8 that starts with 1. That's because that 1 heralds a UTF-8 multi-byte sequence, but you're only providing 1 byte. That converter looks at 11001001, sees 110 = 'n', and can't make sense of the rest. He sounds like he took that engineering group photograph as proof...

This is the video: Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3lZe5_22kyw The fact that the clouds have ragged edges means that there is turbulent air movement going on. That's why these clouds shouldn't not change. The forum doesn't embed the "shorts" URLs, you have to rewrite them. @Edward Current

Re: the thermographic video: Why do you think it was a close distance? the pass at the start? Why do you think the zoom is part of the original footage? I agree the camera wasn't handheld because there's a lot of magnification and that's not possible to do well handheld. This source was 30 fps...

Excerpted: The plane shows 30 to 24 fps conversion, but the orbs don't. Why is this significant? 24 fps is the standard frame rate for film. Virtually every movie you see in the theater is 24 fps. If you work on VFX for movies, your default timeline is set to 24 fps. 24 fps is definitely not...

Go frame-by-frame through the footage and pay special attention to when the plane seemingly "jumps" further ahead in the frame suddenly. It happens every 4 frames or so. That's the conversion from 30 to 24 fps. Frame numbers: 385-386 379-380 374-375

if you stabilized on the contrails, you'd see a jittery plane, but that's harder to stabilize on the plane isn't near the edges of its contrail? you don't comp anything out, just paste the new plane+orbs on top

Exactly! And that's exactly what we're seeing in https://www.metabunk.org/threads/alleged-flight-mh370-ufo-teleportation-videos.13104/post-299126 ! That's how we know it's fake!

A good reason to look out the window...

It's not difficult to match the path of the original plane if you track that first; that gives you the path for your own animation. The beauty of that is that you don't need to do anything with the contrail, so it's really low-effort.

What is not logical about it? To me, it looks like a low-effort method to create a good-looking hoax. have you seen my list of the 3 steps it takes?

He's just fishing for excuses for it not to be fake.

He's going to ask his followers which type of cow is being abducted on the patch.

It's no different from a normal camera.

It doesn't matter if its thermal video or not, the objects are where you see them. Thermal cameras are not magic, they just show another type of light. (Some animals might be able to see it.) The orbs are fake and move with the fake aircraft. The contrail is real and belongs to a real aircraft...