Search results

Tip: Save the image; then use the "Attach files" button from the editor to upload the image to Metabunk; click on the icon for the attached image to insert it into your post at the cursor position. (Check the "Link policy" under "Info" in the site navigation for why to do this.)

So they had a pair of them, flying in formation? o_O

If they don't have any evidence (read: example shots showing the effect), your reaction should be strong doubt. I know of no optical principle that would introduce corners where they were none; the blurring from being out of focus would rather tend to round contours more. [Edit: sprinkled some...

That these are 3D models can be seen at the very beginning of the video , where part of the drone fuselage can be seen.

r/UFOs likes to encourage posting in their MH370 megathread by removing related posts; this happened to you. Feel free to repost your analysis here.

Excerpting for visibility:

That's March 6, 2014, 23:49 UTC. Considering that MH370 took off a day later, there seems to be a problem with the date given. Compare:

You should probably throw an abs() in there when you compute the differences, otherwise aren't you bound to end up with zero as the total motion is zero?

Excerpting @V0LDY's megapost for visibility (and embedding the images):

Neither is simple. If you have monocular footage, and apply a "depth map" or, which is the same thing, shear parts of the image but not others, you're going to "uncover" pixels that aren't there in the monocular footage, and that need to be filled somehow. Unless, of course, you always shear...

original source: Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15sc8fb/another_wild_detail_objects_in_plane_abduction/ In this frame analysis, I wanted to look into the exact moment the alleged portal is opened (which spans about 9 frames). TL;DR Using a method called frame stacking, I’ve...

This photo was taken near Portland, Oregon on December 11th, 2005, at around 11AM. Holding Pattern Contrail near Nowra, Australia.

These are all valid points. But can we see the aircraft's configuration? The stereo footage doesn't have enough detail. And we don't know its altitude, either, given the lack of true stereo data. We do know that the measured 200 knots are airspeed because they're determined relative to the...

Well, if you're not beholden to any facts, feel free to assume the lizard people had hijacked the aircraft and flew it to a spot where they could abduct it unseen. The satellite data was a coverup, it's not real. The wreckage is really from MH17. And the filming was done via a reverse engineered...

The thing to do when there's ambiguity is to go to the source, which I should've quoted to begin with; my apologies. The point stands that the incidence of UFO reports deviates somewhat systematically from simple population density, as per the Rand report.

I recommend the graph that actually shows absolute air speed (the mach number depends on air density). Note that it shows the maximum speed for that altitude. It's not true that it "doesn't go lower", the 777 starts falling out of the sky at ~150 knots (275 km/h), which it does at least once...

Yes, it is. But it's like someone took a 2D video, tilted it slightly, and then took 3D footage of that. (That's what the "gradient" talk is about.) Kind of like taking 3D footage of your 2D screen at an angle.

Yes it is? Just paste the overlay to both videos with a small offset?

It doesn't? SBIRS is to use more sophisticated infrared technologies than the DSP to enhance the detection of strategic and theater ballistic missile launches and the performance of the missile-tracking function. SBIRS High (also now simply referred to as "SBIRS") is to consist of four...

You can't fly a standard rate 2-minute turn (like the aircraft in the video) at that speed; they'd fly a half-rate 4 minute turn instead, or simply choose a convenient bank angle if not under ATC supervision.