Search results

But if the camera is pointed out a double paned window... why don't they get reflections like this all the time? Maybe, the camera doesn't have lights. Maybe a beam of light hit the camera and lit it up. Car headlights? The UFO is the accidentally illuminated camera. That makes more sense.

Translation: "Our security camera captured this last night. It appears to be shining bright white light on the ground. It must have been very brief, almost less than a second, as it is only on a single frame. The object was noticed when reviewing the photos." Is this the reflection of the...

It seems like a kinky pleasure. It's wrong, but it feels so good to be bad once in awhile.

Re: Peter A. Sturrock https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._Sturrock The book: The UFO Enigma: A New Review of the Physical Evidence According to the Preface to the book, it had its roots in a "workshop" held by members of The Society for Scientific Exploration. Article from Journal of...

Article - Time Magazine - Society for Scientific Exploration A mixed bag. Anything from true eccentrics to guys who want to get some entertainment. I feel that the skepticism - or rigor - is situational and inconsistent. On the whole, not anything you can really hang your hat on.

Arrived, and it's no help at all. It uses the 1998 Vallee article as the sole source and just takes it literally. All the same info; including the street address and the false claim that the material was carbon steel. The carbon steel claim is then included in a list of materials from other...

I asked my questions to help rule out an afterimage. It seems there were no strong light sources involved. What I suspect is an unformed visual hallucination and an altered state of consciousness. I suspect a simple partial seizure. I suspect you may be describing an aura associated with...

As a teenager my buddies and I hiked up to a microwave tower on a hill overlooking Joshua Tree National Monument. I could hear voices in the wire fence around the tower. Or maybe it was the guy wires. Very odd.

Is it out of focus or is it poor resolution due to distance and atmospheric scattering?

You've attached a photo of the infamous Chinese Balloon. So you mean maybe it's a giant balloon? But I think we've established that there's more than one of these balloon-like entities. And it would have to be impossibly high.

Does the program get LOS Sphere dist ft 12725 from manually putting in LOS Sphere size ft 1 (a reasonable estimate of 1 foot in diameter)? The program looks at the proportional size of the sphere within the frame and compares it to the FOV of the camera frame (in degrees) and comes up with an...

I have a question about Video Zoom % 295 -How is this defined? What does percent of video zoom mean? -Are you getting the number - 295 in this case - from metadata? I'm wondering if video zoom is another way of saying digital zoom? Maybe 295 percent is a (digital) zoom range factor?

We have no usable data so far. Altitude in feet is ambiguous. Estimated absolute size, estimated distance and estimated absolute speed tell us nothing. People don't tell you what they saw, they tell you what they think. What if it's close and small rather than large and distant? Shape of...

https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/how-high-can-a-helium-balloon-float Note that toy balloons = latex, not mylar. https://www.quora.com/How-high-can-a-typical-Mylar-party-balloon-travel-if-it-is-inflated-with-helium 12km = 39,000 feet. So no reason these can't be a swarm of 12 inch latex...

They don't have to be weather balloons. Amazon 60 Pcs Memorial Balloons White Funeral Balloons White Latex Balloons 12 in At a wedding

I remember one witness repeatedly asking something like "Who uses white balloons"? Well that's pretty obvious, isn't it?

If sighting one and two are the same object, this is very roughly the flight path. From north to south. The line isn't meant to represent start and end points. Just to give a rough idea. I may be making an error, so this needs to be checked.

In sequence: First sighting: 10:18:08 PST Second sighting: 10:21:08 Third sighting: 11:08:37 You have to concentrate on the relative positions of line of sight to Venus and line of sight to UFO. First two could be the same object. The third doesn't fit.

Could this be one balloon-like entity seen several different times? What would the "flight-path" be in that case?

As I pointed out earlier, that kind of ambiguous or sloppy language is common. In this case we have a video rather than a purely verbal description. If ambiguous language is allowed to stand, errors can compound. When reading or hearing verbal descriptions of a UFO as overhead and big as a...