Search results

The fire. I'm posting this immediately and haven't worked out anything.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/18/world/middleeast/gaza-hospital-israel-hamas-explained.html

Also from 2022 https://www.jewishpress.com/news/eye-on-palestine/islamic-jihad/gazans-angered-by-islamic-jihad-rockets-misfiring-and-exploding-inside-strip/2022/08/07/

What are you arguing? That evidence of a large explosion, as in 500+ pound bomb, could be hidden by the resolution of the photo? That maybe if we had a higher resolution photo we would see tiny little marks on the walls? Not credible. It's not likely the walls would be standing at all. If...

This is from August of '22: https://www.israelhayom.com/2022/08/08/after-initial-snag-egypt-brokered-ceasefire-holds-firm/

Just stuff I've picked up from other sources, and some common sense. The scene is not consistent with more than 400 dead. It would take days to clean up that kind of slaughter pen, even in peace time. But the morning after the scene is pristine? Not credible. -Not a JDAM. The lightest bomb a...

I feel that you're still rushing things. The sky isn't going anywhere. To give more precise locations there are two paths. You can learn how to identify smaller stars, or you can learn the coordinate system. Just a primer: For learning the smaller stars I recommend two things. At home...

Butterflies of Ecuador project I wouldn't bother those folks until a full resolution photo could be sent.

I get this too.

What exactly is causing these artifacts to appear?

Too wet and too may bugs.

To make it harder for AI image recognition to flag it as a copyright violation.

The Mark Quisp method. https://www.metabunk.org/threads/claim-uap-researcher-released-clear-smoking-gun-photo-of-orb-captured-by-photographer.13182/page-6#post-303585 I tried it on a JPEG SMPTE Color Bar. I kept it simple. I just increased the brightness in ACDSee. Before After And...

So, you like clutter.

We've been warned that there are many similar species. But Adelpha epinone looks pretty good. The areas of white pigment are separated by the veins. Those distinct areas are what I've been incorrectly calling scales. The actual scales are much smaller. In the photo of Adelpha epinone, I see...

It's an embankment on the side of the road. How high is unknown. I would have climbed the embankment to get a cleaner landscape. But maybe he likes clutter in the foreground.

Not pedantic. That needed to be corrected. The "borders" I've been talking about are veins. The areas between the veins... don't seem to have a name. Edit: Maybe they're called cells?

A washed out part of the sky? It seems to me that would underexpose the photo. And yeah, you could argue that it's a half stop underexposed. But this is digital, with so many things in between the camera original and my eye. It's hard not to miss the purity of film.

That would be a pretty reasonable place to take a spot meter reading, if it averages over the entire square. But is that the area you would choose if there were a 20 meter orb floating in front of you? But the story is still confused as to how much time he had to see this orb then take a...

Maybe he was trying to take a selfie with the self-timer. Maybe that would explain the vertical photo. And the close focus... if that really was the way he set it. I think selfie's are fatuous, but that's just me.