Search results

I'm going to refine a bit. They were somewhere over the "Nellis Range." Area 51 is just a part of that. Not possible to determine exactly how far away they were. Nevada Test and Training Range (NTTR) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevada_Test_and_Training_Range It would be hard to track...

More examples of distant battlefield illumination flares.

Hmmm. Could be. The second video? That's a tough one. Too little resolution. There are only a very few neighborhoods on hills in Las Vegas, and those are usually not very steep hills. You usually just see the neighbor's roof. (So why live on a hill anyway?) There are some places on the...

I think these are distant battlefield illumination flares to the NW. The right most hotel is The Stratosphere Tower. Red arrow - Fontainebleau. Yellow arrow - Resorts World Las Vegas Green Arrow - Encore Notice that the Fontainebleau is dark. It's not open yet. The only way to get this...

I think these flares are very distant. There are very few neighborhoods in Las Vegas with this kind of hill view. In both videos we seem to be looking northwest from the hills in the Henderson area. Rachel is northwest. In other words, Area 51.

Another MB thread about battlefield flares with more info: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/mysterious-illuminated-objects-filmed-from-ferry-off-us-coast-military-flares.10942/#post-234531 These Las Vegas flares appear orange because of distance and atmospheric extinction.* *I've sworn to be...

As a matter of fact that's what I named this post: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/san-diego-ufos-%E2%80%93-more-battlefield-illumination-flares.12491/

More battlefield illumination flares.

Can you give a link to the street view?

I doubt that very much, I must say. I thought it might be an empty plastic grocery bag blowing around in the back.

I'm lost. Could you define what you're measuring here? Are you measuring the apparent direction of travel of the UAP across multiple frames?

C'mon! Good Television. -The Poopy-Pants Skeptic has a dramatic inexplicable experience. He's embarrassed and proven to be a closed minded douchebag all at once. So good times. -They hate him so it's good he's injured. It's called revenge. -Why would these con artists care if something is...

Olay, working my way through this https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/Videos/videoid/880293/

Yes, I quite understand that. When I was young and naïve, I argued that point with Flat Earthers when they were talking about a close Sun. I can see how this would work if the UAP were very close to the camera. The UAV isn't flying that fast. Given that this is a powerful telescopic lens...

Okay. That was just added to the OP... So, -what was the initial position of the camera relative to the body of the Reaper UAV? -was the Reaper flying on a straight course or orbiting? -which way was the camera panning? -does the red arrow and the N indicate the course of the vehicle or the...

That's the Mosul Sphere. This is not the Mosul Sphere video. Edit: My mistake. You're right.

I do see what you're saying though. In your scenario, the U.S. recon vehicle is flying a straight course at high altitude and distant from the scene on the ground. In the first few seconds of the video, the camera on the U.S. Vehicle is panning to keep the distant scene on the ground steadily...

Why do you think it's a Reaper UAV?

Why do you think the U.S. vehicle is a Reaper? BTW, the General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper (sometimes called Predator B) is an unmanned aerial vehicle - UAV https://www.missiongo.io/unmanned-aerial-vehicles-uav-unmanned-aerial-systems-uas-and-autonomous-drones-whats-the-difference/#:~:text=While...

Finally. Some useful video. Whatever this is, its motion cannot be solely due to parallax effects. In the opening seconds, the U.S. reconnaissance UAV is clearly not orbiting, yet the UAP flies through the frame. After the UAP passes through the frame the U.S. UAV seems to be pacing it...